KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 218 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

In your opinion, what would have been the best year for the X-Division to have Xplosion on Spike TV as a one-hour show.

Also, is Desmond Wolfe a good commentator?
 
None. The X-Division didn't need its own show. Considering there were no weight limits, technically everyone was part of the X-Division no? TNA needed a second show, but not for the X-Division.

Not really. Not bad but not great.
 
I posted this on another wrestling forum.

I don't get why so many people want to rush Cody right on into the main event scene so fast when he loses the IC title. I like where he is right now, he's fine where he is right now, I don't think he's ready to be a main eventer just yet. I want to see him be a main eventer someday, but just not right now and I want to see it done the right way, he's needs to keep being further developed, so I say keep him a mid-carder for right now until the time is right for him to be a main event player. The writers have done a superb job of Cody ever since he made his debut, he's gone from being tag team partners with DiBiase, being apart Legacy, having the Dashing gimmick, currently the IC Champion and one day being a great World Champion.

Let me know what you think. Do you agree?
 
It's the common practice: have someone hold the midcard title for a long time then drop it before going to the world title. It's worked before and it'll work now.q
 
This is what my friend had to say about Taker/HHH:

It's gonna be another craptastic match except this time, it's gonna be in a cage! ("Cell, idiot!") And this time, it'll get even more blind praise just because of they're gonna get to use the cell walls in the match. And because... they're the Undertaker and HHH, they're gonna get to BLEED! OOOHHH YAY! BLOOD!

After all of this, regardless of winner, the fans of this match are gonna just blow up HHH's already heavily-inflated ego even more by claiming it to be a great match. Please, 'the fuck outta here with that shit.


What are your thoughts on this? Is he right? Is he wrong?
 
What do you think the chances are of HHH/Taker blading during their match, seeing as they "broke the rules" last year by utilizing chair shots in their last match?
 
Currently who are the most underrated and overrated superstars?

Underrated: Barreta/Kidd. They're just fun to watch.
Overrated: Davey Richards he made me stop watching ROH.

This is what my friend had to say about Taker/HHH:

It's gonna be another craptastic match except this time, it's gonna be in a cage! ("Cell, idiot!") And this time, it'll get even more blind praise just because of they're gonna get to use the cell walls in the match. And because... they're the Undertaker and HHH, they're gonna get to BLEED! OOOHHH YAY! BLOOD!

After all of this, regardless of winner, the fans of this match are gonna just blow up HHH's already heavily-inflated ego even more by claiming it to be a great match. Please, 'the fuck outta here with that shit.


What are your thoughts on this? Is he right? Is he wrong?

Their match last year was very good. It just wasn't as good as they said it was.

Uncensred 97 is the one were Sting comes back yea?


I watched it before I even asked you, lulz.


more suggestions please

Beach Blast 92, but I'd highly recommend watching it out of order. Watch the tag title match before Sting's match. It makes the show a lot better.
Clash of the Champions 17, although you'll want to fast forward some of the filler stuff.
Shawn Michaels - Hits From The Heartbreak Kid. It's a Coliseum Video and a little hard to find but it's one of their better tapes I've ever seen.

What do you think the chances are of HHH/Taker blading during their match, seeing as they "broke the rules" last year by utilizing chair shots in their last match?

Possible but I'm not sure.
 
What match do you think will steal the show? I think Jericho/Punk will be more like Orton/Punk last year. Not booking-wise but quality-wise. I think it'll be a draw between HHH/Taker and Rock/Cena to be realistic.
 
Their match last year was very good. It just wasn't as good as they said it was.

I don't think it was good at all. Not even decent.

It was nothing but high spots. And I guess, like others have told me, you could argue that it was 'Taker hanging on his streak to a thread. But that's just it. That's the story. When you compare it to HBK/Taker, I mean, HBK/Taker had a fight, it had basic wrestling, it had within-the-match storytelling; and it was a conflict between light and darkness, good and evil. The only other dimension that this year's match has added is "Corporate vs. Entertainment," "Business vs. Product." IDK, I can't find the right word for what Undertaker represents.
 
I don't think it was good at all. Not even decent.

It was nothing but high spots. And I guess, like others have told me, you could argue that it was 'Taker hanging on his streak to a thread. But that's just it. That's the story. When you compare it to HBK/Taker, I mean, HBK/Taker had a fight, it had basic wrestling, it had within-the-match storytelling; and it was a conflict between light and darkness, good and evil. The only other dimension that this year's match has added is "Corporate vs. Entertainment," "Business vs. Product." IDK, I can't find the right word for what Undertaker represents.

It's not going to compare to HBK vs. Taker. There wasn't as much drama but sometimes that's ok.
 
Should wrestlers have more say in their gimmicks/characters that are given to them or that they come up with, but converse with creative on how they may be able to get over for example?

How do you think a locker room is affected, if say there's certain people who are on a card don't get along?

Reason i asked these questions is im part of a wrestling promotion as a rookie and still training and such.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top