KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 88 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

Bruno Sammartino disassociated himself with WWE because he doesn't like where Vince McMahon took the sport. Personally, I think that if wrestling hadn't evolved....i.e., if they still tried to run things the way they were done in Bruno's day, professional wrestling on a large scale wouldn't even exist today......it would be seen only in high school gyms and state armories.

Additionally, I think Bruno has deprived us of his presence. He could have been an esteemed elder statesman and ambassador for old-time wrestling.....and I'd bet Vince would have been happy to run a few programs through him. What a waste.

What do you think, K.B.?
 
Is it true that the WWE was really close to being out of business in 97/98? Or is it a over the top statement.

I only started to watch in 99 and we know how popular it was then.

More late 96/early 97 they were in real trouble. Then the Border War got a lot of people's attention and they were saved by Starrcade 97. If Starrcade 97 goes off like it should, we'd be making a SuperBrawl LD for tomorrow night.

Bruno Sammartino disassociated himself with WWE because he doesn't like where Vince McMahon took the sport. Personally, I think that if wrestling hadn't evolved....i.e., if they still tried to run things the way they were done in Bruno's day, professional wrestling on a large scale wouldn't even exist today......it would be seen only in high school gyms and state armories.

Additionally, I think Bruno has deprived us of his presence. He could have been an esteemed elder statesman and ambassador for old-time wrestling.....and I'd bet Vince would have been happy to run a few programs through him. What a waste.

What do you think, K.B.?

Bruno is a very interesting case. He was ungodly popular in his day and still drew in the 80s as a nostalgia act, but he's stuck to his guns and I give him major credit for that. Wrestling would have survived, but cable killed Bruno's era, not Vince.
 
When was the last time there was a heel vs. heel match of any sort at Wrestlemania? By this I mean it was a real match, singles, tag team, or multi-man, and there were no faces involved.
 
You could argue last year with Orton vs. DiBiase vs. Rhodes. Orton was getting there but was still a tweener kind of. It's a stretch but you could say that was all heel.
 
Does a such thing as a good match between Taker and The Rock exist? If so could you point towards it and if not why do you think they were never able to put on good matches.
 
Michael "Mr. WZNexus" V.;2870947 said:
What contributed to the death of WCW more: the idiocy of the writers, the egos of the wrestlers, or both in an equal way?

Starrcade 97 more than anything. Probably more the egos of those choices but it's more the way they did business.
 
With what you said about Heenan, since Hogan was the biggest face of the 80s and Heenan was his foil, wouldn't he be considered the biggest heel of the 80s?
 
Yeah probably. He had Studd, Bundy, Andre, Orndorff, Rude, the Brainbusters, Haku and so on. All of them had Heenan out there with them and the majority of them went after Hogan at some point.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top