KB Answers Wrestling Questions

[klunderbunker]

I could see it happening but I don't think it'll stick.

 

[Барбоса]

I'd like them to continue teasing the "Daniel Wyatt" idea. Maybe have Punk help Bryan at TLC but then Bryan fails to return the favour against the Shield later in the night. Of course, that might be too much like setting up Punk/Bryan, which does not seem to be on the cards.

 

[klunderbunker]

I would put very little stock in what's in the cards this far out.

 

[Барбоса]

Is the gimmick of Bad News Barrett bad or is it what he is getting to say that is bad?

Personally, I am leaning towards the former. I don't think him being the arena all the time is a great idea either. Have Barrett go out and ridicule the public but make it part of a programme with an opponent. Right now, it just seems pointless.

 

[klunderbunker]

True, though it's only been one night so far.

 

[Cereal Killer]

Their ratings are fine where they are.

They'll probably alter how they run TV when the child audience grows up but not by much.

This is what went down after Hogan's time, leading to the New Generation, but why don't they just aim to bring in more children like they did in '85 and 2008?

 

[klunderbunker]

Back then they were trying somethign new by going to the adult audience. It was a new idea for the WWF.

 

[Cereal Killer]

Yeah but why don't they aim to bring in more of the children into the product?

 

[klunderbunker]

Now? They are.

 

[#MrScissorsKick]

What percent do you think the TLC World Title unification match ends in a clean finish?

 

[klunderbunker]

I'll go high and say 8.

 

[Cereal Killer]

Now? They are.

Their ratings are fine where they are.

They'll probably alter how they run TV when the child audience grows up but not by much.

You said in the second quote the WWE may change how they run TV. In which way?

 

[klunderbunker]

It'll become more serious. Not entirely but somewhat.

 

[Cereal Killer]

Why would they have to adapt to that certain generation (current 7-12 year olds)? Can't they continue with what they're doing and reach out to the next lot or with your answer, would they be doing both?

 

[Richard Blonoff]

If MITB goes back to just one briefcase, which I think it should(no cases for the IC or US title), do you think it should continue to be its own PPV or should it go back to Mania or another big four?

Bonus question, how much of a cluterfuck would a tag team MITB match be? I know it would be pretty awful, but a part me wants it to happen. I just have a soft spot for chaotic matches that make no sense.

 

[#MrScissorsKick]

I may have asked you this already, but what are some things you miss in wrestling?

 

[klunderbunker]

Why would they have to adapt to that certain generation (current 7-12 year olds)? Can't they continue with what they're doing and reach out to the next lot or with your answer, would they be doing both?

They could try and do both but they're too lazy to do so.

If MITB goes back to just one briefcase, which I think it should(no cases for the IC or US title), do you think it should continue to be its own PPV or should it go back to Mania or another big four?

Bonus question, how much of a cluterfuck would a tag team MITB match be? I know it would be pretty awful, but a part me wants it to happen. I just have a soft spot for chaotic matches that make no sense.

Depends on how many people arei n the match.

A huge one, but it would be fun chaos.

I may have asked you this already, but what are some things you miss in wrestling?

Letting the wrestlers come up with their own promos instead of it being totally scripted.

 

[Fire Marshall Bill]

Your favorite promo ever?

 

[klunderbunker]

One you'll probably never see elsewhere: Texas Tornado at Summerslam 1990.

 

[The Fabulous Rougeau's]

Which wrestler(s) of the last 30 years from either WCW/NWA or WWF/WWE that was a main eventer would you say was the most poorly booked (meaning they could have been even greater)?

 

[klunderbunker]

Luger. You give him a win over Flair in 1988 and Sting stays in the midcard for a long time.

 

[Fire Marshall Bill]

Some fans noticed Eva Marie laughing her way to the back, following her elimination at WWE's Survivor Series pay per view. The Wrestling Observer is reporting that she was told to do that, and that babyfaces are being taught "not" to sell their losses, but rather smile and engage with fans

I know Eva Marie is a bad example considering her personality, but isn't this against the rules of a face? I wouldn't even call it heelish. Aren't talent supposed to want to win? That's like saying John Cena shouldn't care if he loses at TLC.

 

[klunderbunker]

I know Eva Marie is a bad example considering her personality, but isn't this against the rules of a face? I wouldn't even call it heelish. Aren't talent supposed to want to win? That's like saying John Cena shouldn't care if he loses at TLC.

This would be added to the list of "really dumb ideas WWE has which no one else understands at all."

 

[Fire Marshall Bill]

Well at least it'll blend in with the countless other things on the list.

 

[cult_of_icecream_bar]

so they're unifying the titles in a December PPV,who would've thought that?