KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 683 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

Would there still be some intrigue for Samoa Joe coming to WWE in the future, or has that time passed?

So I was listening to a DDP interview, and DDP believes he should've beat Goldberg at Halloween Havoc '98 for the title, because he said Goldberg needed to lose clean to another face "out of nowhere," and the Nash/Hall cattle prod finish at Starrcade was a mistake. Agree or disagree?
 
Would there still be some intrigue for Samoa Joe coming to WWE in the future, or has that time passed?

So I was listening to a DDP interview, and DDP believes he should've beat Goldberg at Halloween Havoc '98 for the title, because he said Goldberg needed to lose clean to another face "out of nowhere," and the Nash/Hall cattle prod finish at Starrcade was a mistake. Agree or disagree?

It's passed.

Agree on the latter, not so much on the former but it's not completely insane.

You've been given the task to get Antonio Cesaro's character over with the crowd. How do you proceed?

1. Have him win matches.

2. Everything else.
 
He wouldn't be as over as a heel but he would still be a top guy.

Personally, I think that the return of Heyman undermined an incarnation of Punk that I was really enjoying - him telling quasi-truths about the Rock appearing once a year to overshadow the WWE and how it made everyone else in the company look bad, especially given how he had just been handed a title match. I think he was doing a better job of attacking the Rock than Cena did for much of their Mania build. And speaking of Cena, Punk was also continuing the kind of rhetoric that had been so well received during the WWE Summer of Punk, questioning why John Cena received repeated shots at the WWE title despite numerous failures to recapture it. While he was the heel, you could not help but realise that on some level, Punk was right.

I know that it would not have gone anywhere in the long run as such characters very rarely make any sort of money and it was necessary to build up Punk as a truly unlikeable, chicken shit champion for the Rock to go after, but I still think that, much like Ryback's push, something different was set aside because of extended booking.
 
It probbly was, but a lot of that character was crushed when Nash texted himself and the feud somehow wound up being Nash vs. HHH.
 
HHH and EB have similar personalities also same ideaology with wrestling and less entertainment so on a scale 1-10 how close are HHH and EB the same
Apparently when HHH takes over the majority of the wrestling product and Kevin Dunn could be out who would fill that role as Exective Producer
Will HHH maybe not be like when it was TV-14 have the content be more aggressive something like in between the current WWE & TNA product
 
I am not saying HHH is going to make the same mistakes EB has They both employ their pals and it seems for the most part guys around them get big pushes over more talented wrestlers The one difference is Punk gets pushed probably more by HHH than VKM Those are the similar characteristics and no matter what HHH has in mind for the future WWE will at least do a 2.9 and VKM's standards for Raw has always been between 2.7-3.1
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top