KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 313 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

Opinions on Big Shows career up to this point? And what period of his career have you enjoyed the most (if any of it)?

The beginning. Back then he was awesome. As for his career, he's been around almost 17 years and he's gone up and down a lot, but it's been more down than up.

Have you seen that video of Kenny Omega vs 9 year old Haruka?

Here is a link to the vid if you haven't seen it yet.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9obAE2w26Y

I've heard of it and it's freaking stupid.
 
If someone does cash in the Money in the Bank briefcase and lose, does that not severely hurt their credibility? Unless it was someone like Santino where no-one would expect them to win I don't see how it would help anybody.
 
If someone does cash in the Money in the Bank briefcase and lose, does that not severely hurt their credibility? Unless it was someone like Santino where no-one would expect them to win I don't see how it would help anybody.

I'll give you an answer as well since I like your question a lot.

No it does not diminish their credibility if done correctly.

here's a scenario, say for shits and giggles kofi wins and the current champion he cashes it in on has a follower. Lets say the champ is miz at the time and riley is still with the miz. So miz is limping but willing to defend, riley is not supposed to be there for some reason.

kofi cashes it in, the bell rings and they have a match...ref gets knocked out and out comes riley who wasn't supposed to be there, he knocks out kofi with a chair and pulls miz on top of kofi, the ref comes to and counts one two three.

Do you respect kofi any less? no. Why not? because he was screwed.

in conclusion if it's done right it won't hurt the guy cashing it in but we will have to listen to cole make fun of him every time he has a match.
 
In no order:

Cena vs. Lesnar
HHH vs. Taker
Cena vs. Rock
Punk vs. Bryan (Over the Limit)
Bryan vs. Sheamus (Extreme Rules)

That's just off the top of my head mind you.
 
In all fairness, reports indicated he had an advanced form of dementia, which severely impairs judgment and reasoning. Simply put, he could have been out of his mind at the time of the murders. Had he not killed himself, I'd still think he'd have to be locked away, because in that condition he could have still been a threat to others. However, is it really right to call him a villain when his mind had deteriorated beyond normal functions? Any one of us could commit the same atrocities under the influence of the same mental disability.

It's also been speculated this disease was brought on by all the head trauma he had suffered throughout his career. In a way, he'd sacrificed his mental health, and by extension, the health of his family, for the sake of our business. It's sad, but in honesty, I can't blame Benoit for what he did.

What do you think? Do you agree?
 
How is it when Big Johnny tries to sign Brock to a huge contract HHH intervenes because Ace doesn't have the authority but when he signs Big Show to a similar contract it's 'Iron Clad' and basically impenetrable?

How badly is WWE suffering from having Rey and Orton suspended, Barrrett and Henry injured and Miz off filming The Marine 3?
 
What do you think about past attitude era wrestlers returning every week and wrestling a match? So far we've had Vader and Psycho Sid.

I think it's a great concept. One of their better ideas.
 
Reading some of your reviews around 2002/2003 (mainly around Smackdown) got me thinking...how different do you think Edge's career would have been had he not have had that neck injury in 2003? Would we have even seen the Ultimate Opportunist character at all?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top