KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 312 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

Depends on the kind of problem.

My thing with Ryback is that while I can see the comparisons with Goldberg, Goldberg had guys like Hall, Hogan, Hennig, and The Giant among others to go through. The WWE doesn't have that. So what if Ryback beats Ziggler or he beats Swagger or Rhodes? They lose most of the time anyway so it's not a big deal. I don't think the WWE has had a dominant heel since JBL where if he lost, it meant something. That's the problem I see with Ryback.
 
Goldberg didn't get to anyone of note until about #75 which was over Raven for the US Title. Until then almost everyone was a low level jobber. Instead of guys like he's fighting now, he should start running over people like Primo or Epico or Tatsu or whatever. They have this massive roster and a lot of those guys would love to get steady TV appearances jobbing.
 
That's true. They should have done it by now. He's been squashing nobodies for a couple of months and it's gotten old.

Regarding the Kidman/London storyline in 2004, did it seem like to you that Kidman came off as a face while everyone else came off as a heel?
 
If I remember right that was where he was afraid to use the Shooting Star and cost them the tag titles right?

Yeah he kind of did. The guy was having psychological issues and London was basically saying be depressed on your own time and get over it when you're out here, which is a pretty jerky move.
 
If I remember right that was where he was afraid to use the Shooting Star and cost them the tag titles right?

Yeah he kind of did. The guy was having psychological issues and London was basically saying be depressed on your own time and get over it when you're out here, which is a pretty jerky move.

Yeah, it was. I would like to see that kind of storyline again except not with concussions since they're cracking down on those.

What is a worser case of fired angles: Austin or Stephanie McMahon?
 
Bischoff fired Austin, he comes back a month later as GM. His team loses at Survivor Series. He comes back a month later as sheriff.

The Alliance loses at Survivor Series. Stephanie comes back a month later. She loses after Wrestlemania and is supposed to never appear on TV again. She is named Smackdown GM two months later.

Which was more ridiculous?
 
Me and you both know throughout the history of MITB winners that nobody has ever cashed in and came up empty handed. So my question to you is do you think a MITB winner will ever cash in his briefcase and fail to win the title? It's never happened before but anything is always possible.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top