Shadowmancer
I am The Last Baron
How does WWE screw up Roman Reigns being over this time?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
How does WWE screw up Roman Reigns being over this time?
To make the fans want to see him win it. If he had kept it after beating Ambrose, no one would care. Now they care.
Pretty much yeah.
When was the last time the WWE World Heavyweight Championship (or WWE Championship/World Heavyweight Championship) changed hands on RAW/SD during a normal, non-MITB match that didn't involve injury/suspension? Just plain old unexpected storyline-driven title change.
Edge beat RVD/Cena in 06 after RVD got high in a car with Sabu. There's been like 10 Cash-ins. There was a battle Royale on Smackdown after Batista got hurt. Those are the only relatively recent title changes that happened on TV and not on PPV.
I seriously can't remember when it happened last. HHH was awarded the WHC in 2002. HHH beat Big Show on RAW in late 1999/early 2000. HHH beat Foley after Summerslam 1999. Austin beat Kane in 1998 King of the Ring. They are literally the only ones that come to mind.
Didn't Cena beat Rey for the title on a RAW during the Summer of Punk? If I remember right Rey won a tourney or battle royal for a vacant title, Cena was reinstated after being fired & given a title shot vs. Rey in the ME of that same Raw where he won the title, & then Punk came back with the real title.
Who faces Reigns at WM32 for the title, assuming he's champion until then - Cena, Lesnar, HHH, or someone else?
Last night, I had a feeling the ominous appearance of Vince McMahon was going to result in Vince congratulating Roman..... and starting the long-abandoned war within the Authority in which Vince battles Mr. & Mrs. Levesque for corporate supremacy.
Is that war a thing of the past....or do you think we'll eventually see it?
If so, who wins?
Two nights of great storytelling, and so many people are once again excited and enthusiastic about the WWE. Why do WWE make it so hard for themselves? Surely, Cena 2.0 isn't going to be paraded come 2016, right?
On another note;
Why are there so many smarks who fail to understand in-ring storytelling? Not every match needs 1000+ moves to interest an audience, actually, I'd go as far as saying, that the majority of people tune into WWE for the Storylines and good Wrestling matches at the end of feuds are merely "icing on the cake". (Sheamus vs Reigns at TLC can attest to that. 'Good match, appalling feud')
Thinking about it, WWE putting the title on a redhot Roman Reigns makes a load of sense, and actually makes things easier booking-wise, given they rid themselves of having to feature Sheamus in a major storyline on the RtWM.
With Reigns as Champion, surely he goes into Mania to face one of Brock Lesnar or John Cena, right, or is he going to go against the LoN until Triple H at Mania?
Mhm. I suppose I'm just feeling like a battered housewife every time her husband comes showered & sober to the women's shelter to pick her up. I mean sure, you look respectable and all, but that's not going to last...
Is Vince on TV for long?
The more I think about it, the more I'm leaning towards Cena.