Originally Posted By xfearbefore:
I don't see them. I'd put Kane's promos right next to Orlando Jordan as one of the most embarrassing things in wrestling today. Are we supposed to be taking him seriously? Because I can't every time he cuts a promo right out of a 3rd rate B movie.
To compare Kane to Orlando Jordan is just a slap in the man's face and a comparison that I certainly don't see myself. But an opinion's an opinion.
The guy is the World champion right now and no one gives a shit, he's probably like the 5th or 6th most disliked heel on the roster. Pretty bad for a world champ.
Probably because Kane has now reached that stage where he is so liked, people find it hard to boo him no matter what he does. Nothing will ever change the fact that he is a popular wrestler who has been on TV for a long time now, people recognize that and they like Kane. For example, if they were to turn The Undertaker heel, the fans may not display the type of reaction they are looking for because people like him so much. The same thing happens to Sting in TNA, people don't want to boo him. I'm not saying Kane is on the same level of popularity of any of those men today, but I think it's a similar sort of situation nonetheless.
Please, please tell me you did not just compare Kane to Piper, Flair, Hogan, and The Rock. That's almost offensive to even suggest such a thing.
No, I'm not doing that, I'm simply saying that over-the-top is acceptable and encouraged in the WWE. If you call Kane over-the-top and one who can't employ subtlety, then you'd have to say the same about the Hogans, Pipers and Flairs, none of whom employed much subtlety in their hey day. I personally don't get the hype about Piper on the mic for example, he often came across as a parading bafoon to me but that's a different argument and only my opinion...
See because unlike Kane, Piper, Flair, Hogan and the Rock all made the crowd care about their matches and their promos got the crowds riled up. Kane is met with dead silence, every time. He's lucky to get a few 12 year olds booing him in the front row.
But you can't really compare Kane on the mic to any of those men, really. None of them where playing a 'monster' character....it's not like Kane can come out and talk smack on the local audience's football team to get them riled up, or suck up to them to elicit a major pop, so in that sense he's kind of confined in how he can draw a response. So just to reiterate, no, I'm not saying Kane is on the level of The Rock or even Flair but I am saying he does very well with what he's given and I feel he is very good/excellent on the mic, judging him by the standard of a 'monster' character.
His promo about a week or two ago on Smackdown was literally like 90% yelling. He spits and slobbers on the mic from how much he overacts, it's absolutely awful to watch. Subtlety? What exactly is subtle about yelling about the same shit you've been saying for 13 years while giggling like a madman from a horror movie and trying to sound "scary"?
This all comes down to personal preference really. I love it when Kane starts yelling because he comes across as a madman and a psycho to me and I like that and he's supposed to come across as such. But again, I often find a typical Kane promo will consist of him talking 'normally' for the first 90% of the promo before it finally builds to him yelling at the end, at which point the promo is over anyway.
So, I like to look at the yelling as a type of crescendo to the promo, as if the yelling is something being gradually built up. It's not just Kane yelling, he does yell certainly, but there's more to it than that.
It didn't come across well, it came across very very poorly. Like if someone walked into the room and saw me watching that, I'd literally be embarrassed to be seen watching it, that's how bad he is on the mic.
See I largely feel that way when I watch TNA or Hornswoggle but not Kane. My friend actually walked in the other day during a recent Kane promo and this guy is only a casual fan, and he said 'I didn't know Kane could talk that well'....I'm not saying that's indicative of how everyone will perceive these promos but not everyone finds Kane to be shit on the mic.
His "character" has been dead for years now, let's not pretend otherwise, this title reign of his is his first in 13 years for a valid reason---he's simply not very good anymore.
His character was dead since '05 until Summer of this year, that's because Creative did sweet feck all to preserve and maintain it. However, to be fair, they are currently doing a great job of resurrecting the old Kane that people first loved and that's why you see so much praise in here from the vast majority. Nobody has had their character butchered and failed as much by WWE than Kane, yet he's still here and World Champion no less. No Kane isn't what he once was, but he is more than good enough to hold that title for a few months, no doubt about it in my mind.
Oh sure he used to be awesome about 10 years ago. Unfortunately not he's as intimidating and frightening as a bunny rabbit and both his in-ring work and mic work is subpar at best.
Yeah Kane was awesome 10 years ago and now he is beginning to show signs of that again. His mic work is very good and while he's not as good in the ring as he once was, he is still able to put on a good match by WWE's standards. I'm not saying he's going to put on 'match of the year' bouts, he never has, but he is good at doing what he's meant to do.
I've given Kane promos a chance, one after the other week after week, I can't take it anymore. I give him about 60 seconds and by then it's usually too cringe-worthy to continue watching.
Well that's fair enough, you're entitled to do that. At least you tried...
So are you agreeing with me then that Kane's heel shtick against Taker is old as hell now? It hasn't been entertaining in years, it's a horse that's been beaten to death and literally no one gives a shit about seeing yet another terrible Taker-Kane match.
Kane and Undertaker feuding against each other hasn't been done now since 2004 and it has never been done with the title being the main reason for their conflict. That in itself is different and 'new'.
I remember reading one of your posts a while back that said, you weren't interested in this feud, unless they made Kane look dominant and go over 'Taker. So far, they've made Kane look dominant and we've yet to see him go over 'Taker, whose to say this wont happen during this feud? Let's wait and see.
Reading through a lot of the posts on here, I get the impression that people are now warming to the feud because Kane's renewed push and new lease of life have got people saying, 'let's give this a chance'. Behind Nexus, this feud is easily one of the best going in WWE today.
See because The Undertaker doesn't sound like a baffoon when he says those things. He's been doing it for 20 years and unlike Kane, knows how too cut a subtle promo. You never see Undertaker screaming and yelling and slobbering all over a microphone like Kane, he's always calm and collected and it adds to his character.
But that's your opinion, people could just as easily say they'd be embarrassed to be seen watching a man standing in a hat talking about reaping souls and the dark side, while trying to convince us he has magical powers. Point being here, we as fans, suspend our disbelief when watching guys like 'Taker and Kane.
If you say Kane is cartoony and corny, you cannot do so without mentioning 'Taker who could easily rival Kane in that category, hell he could take the crown! Kane and Undertaker are characters, they are larger than life, they are corny and over-the-top, that's why people like them. Over-the-top is what keeps it interesting.
People don't complain because unlike Kane, the Undertaker is a legend and probably one of the best to ever lace up a pair of boots. Unlike Kane, who hasn't been good in about a decade now.
People don't complain because WWE has afforded The Undertaker God- like status, particularly the last few years. Kane has been assassinated in the character department...imagine had 'Taker been booked the same as Kane, chances are you'd be sitting here saying 'Taker is shit as well. Kane wasn't booked well, 'Taker was pushed to hell and that's what shapes people's perception.
I never singled out Kane for being repetitive. I never said that he was repetitive in fact, so I'm not sure what you're getting at here.
Perhaps not, but you did mention he's been saying the exact same thing about 'Taker for 13 years now which indicates repeatitivness to me. All I was doing was pointing out that everyone repeats themselves, whether it be 'Taker wanting to make you 'Rest in Peace' or Jericho telling us he's the best in the world at what he does, in that monotone voice of his...
And I literally find it baffling that you guys are all creaming over this shit. I saw a better promo cut by the Dudebusters on Superstars a few weeks ago.
It's not baffling because Kane is good on the mic. Again I'm not saying he's an Austin or Rock but as a monster character (which is what he's meant to be), Kane is excellent on the mic. The Dudebusters have potential but at the moment they couldn't hold a candle to Kane's mic work, and not many can who presently work for WWE either, in my opinion. There are a few, but not many.
When did I ever say I didn't respect you if you liked Kane? Don't recall saying that.
Looking back on it, you didn't say that, so there you go. I apologize.
I'm just explaining my point of view, which is that Kane is terrible on the microphone. Which he is.
Good stuff. And I'm just explaining my point of view that he is good at portraying the type of character which he is meant to do and that's why we're all creaming about it in here, that's all.