justinsayne said:I agree with dragon, there's no mystery to Kane now that the mask has been removed so putting back on wouldn't make sence, however I also agree with chain gang in that, if they did a storyline then they could put the mask back on, but I don't think burnig him would be the right storyline because a few years ago, shortly after loseing the mask kane was in a feud with Shane McMahon, and during that feud Shane kicked Kane into a dumpster that was set on fire, and Kane came back unscathed.
The way I would do it, and this is a bit of a stretch, is have Kane face the Masked Kane in a "Loser leaves WWE" match. Then Kane would lose thus leaving the Masked Kane as the only Kane in the WWE, then they could put the mask on the real Kane and no one would know if it's the real Kane or the Masked Kane, then it bring a little mystery back to it.
But like I said this is a bit of a stretch, not to mention confusing as hell, and I honstly don't ever expect to see WWE do it.
This may be true, but look at Rey Mysterio. He was supposed to be mysterious, but when Rey was in WCW, he lost a match and he had to unmask. For all of the diehard fans, they know what Rey Mysterio looks like without a mask. Why is it ok for Rey Mysterio to be masked again, but not put one back on Kane? I'm not saying your opinion is wrong, I'm just simply saying it can be argued from both sides.