KANE: future?

justinsayne said:
I agree with dragon, there's no mystery to Kane now that the mask has been removed so putting back on wouldn't make sence, however I also agree with chain gang in that, if they did a storyline then they could put the mask back on, but I don't think burnig him would be the right storyline because a few years ago, shortly after loseing the mask kane was in a feud with Shane McMahon, and during that feud Shane kicked Kane into a dumpster that was set on fire, and Kane came back unscathed.

The way I would do it, and this is a bit of a stretch, is have Kane face the Masked Kane in a "Loser leaves WWE" match. Then Kane would lose thus leaving the Masked Kane as the only Kane in the WWE, then they could put the mask on the real Kane and no one would know if it's the real Kane or the Masked Kane, then it bring a little mystery back to it.

But like I said this is a bit of a stretch, not to mention confusing as hell, and I honstly don't ever expect to see WWE do it.

This may be true, but look at Rey Mysterio. He was supposed to be mysterious, but when Rey was in WCW, he lost a match and he had to unmask. For all of the diehard fans, they know what Rey Mysterio looks like without a mask. Why is it ok for Rey Mysterio to be masked again, but not put one back on Kane? I'm not saying your opinion is wrong, I'm just simply saying it can be argued from both sides.
 
I am writing this to address the mask issue that i keep reading about. I personally think that kane looks fine without the mask but if wwe had kane go back under the mask, here is an ingenious idea that wwe could use.

For those of you familiar with the book Journey into Darkness that recounts kane's early life before he wrestled will know what i am talking about.

In the book, the mask belonged to kane's father. the mask was some sort of cerimonial mask used in the mexican day of the dead. When kanes house burned down, the only possesions that made it back to kane were some documents and that mask. later on when kane goes to Spain to train, he was required to wrestle under a mask, thus his costume was born. the misconception was that kane wore his costume to hide his scars, which were all psychological as evidenced when kane took his mask off. Kane came to realize that his scars were is his head. The mask still held meaning for kane as evidenced when he faced the imposter. he removed the imposters mask and said, "this is mine" before throwing the imposter out on his ass. My idea is that kane desides to put the mask back on as a sign of respect to his family and to his legacy. the mask would work for kane as it does for mysterio because mysterio were's a mask because he's a luchdore, its family tradition, the mask means something to him. well the same can be applied to kane. In the book, after all the horrors kane endures, he ends up with the mask as his only possession. Kane could say that he is going back to his old costume because he wants to, in a since wear his family history, his history like a badge to remind humself how far he's come in life. This whole senario works perfectly with the BOD reuinion but it would just as well if kane did it on his own. because reburning him makes no sense, hell if you think about it he burned twice in the book and later was suffering from paraniod delusions that he was still hideously scared. we focused on all the bad things that happened to kane and forgot about the good things that happened to kane and the impact they had on him. Even though i think that kane looks fine without the mask, if wwe were to return him to his mask usings a senario like this, then i could respect it, and i'm sure the fans would to, knowing the history behind the mask.
 
^stop spamming or u will get warned then banned^^^


any way kane should be pushed to tag team with taker or over taker and get a last title reign even thought he doesnt want it hes gonna end up facing taker at maina23 where they will both retire and taker will win kz kane dont wanna end his streak and ruin legacy
 
Dan1506 said:
Kasey i wana ask you somthing, you do admit that The undertaker is a very good wrestler right? I know you don't like people who hide behind their gimmicks however for his age and height he still puts on great matches and the fact that he can still brawl with Kurt angle is awsome. Also Dont forget that The undertaker has a downside because of his gimmick, certain moves would look stupid if he did them.
My best wrestlers are Kane and Taker, and i hate how BOTH of them are being mis used in such a terrible way, my wish is to have both Kane and taker with the World titles at the same time.
And People like Kane and taker need to go off with a bang, not people who fadded away.
The Undertaker is pretty decent for a big man. The problem is that he's been saddled in basement feuds with other big guys who can't work to save their life. When Callaway is in the ring with someone who can actually move (Orton), then you really get to see what he can do. However, Vince has found a way to piss his potential down the drain for years and years. The sad thing was that the last time Undertaker wore the strap, he'd gotten fat and immobile (compared to his earlier days and as of recent) and had back problems that limited what he could do physically. This was very apparent on Raw (in I believe it was 1999) when Austin defeated him for the title in one of the most anti-climactic and downright boring matches of either man's career. Undertaker will not have half the prestige of many of the other legend's legacies because he was continually used as a circus toy in angles that did nothing to further his career (Giant Gonzalez, anyone?). If they'd booked him with the same prestige and intelligence as they once did with guys like Michaels, Rock, Hart, and Triple H, then he'd go down as one of the greatest...ever. WWE needs to hire me to actually put some of those guys to good use and to serve as a bullshit filter for their retarted writing staff.
 
I knew you were going to say somthing like that, however The undertaker is known to take down Big men, and i think thats why they put him against Giant Gonzalez, and recently The Great Khali.
What i like most about taker is that hes beaten them all through out all generations.

Hogan, warrior, jake roberts, ect

Triple H, stone cold, The Rock ect

And hes beaten the best in this generation

John cena, Randy ortan ect

It also shows that he realy is the Deadman, Wrestling through all these generations.

Also, thats what WWE is famous for, miss using wrestlers.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,834
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top