John Cena will end up the greatest wrestler in Pro Wrestling History | Page 2 | WrestleZone Forums

John Cena will end up the greatest wrestler in Pro Wrestling History

Yes, HBK started the attitude era. Are you kidding me that he didn't. Jannety being knocked throught glass wasn't something that happened often in the WWF at the time when gimmicks were rampant. Let me remind you that what HBK did was more revolutionary than what Austin did.

Let me also remind you that HBK did this during a time that wasn't considered that attitude era. Austin was molding with what the WWF at the time wanted to do, all because they realized the success someone like HBK could have when acting this all out. May I also remind you that HBK was before Austin in terms of entertaining the WWE(F) fans. Once again that kind shit didn't happen in the WWE until HBK brought it back.

No one had done anything like this since Piper's Pit. That was years earlier. Have you forgotten that in the early 90's there were stars like Ultimate Warrior, TugBoat, Papa Shango, EarthQuake, Nailz, Big Boss Man, Tatanka, and Bad New Brown etc.. All those corny gimmicks, and all the ones I haven't mentioned that were that bad.

In other words HBK stood out. Damn right he had a reason to bitch. He had busted his ass in the WWE(F) for years, and was on the road all the time. Hogan can't say the same. He barely travelled, and never did house shows. Yes, he was a draw because he was rarely at shows. In other words when he showed up, people packed the house. Everyone who has been watching wrestling knows this. Hogan hardly ever made an appearance, and so his showing was much more anticipated. That is why he is such a draw. It is like waving the largest lollipop in front of a young child who has a bunch of small not so good lollipops. Hogan may not have been the biggest, but he was the most appealing considering he was so roided, and he ****e Red/Yellow. They advertised Hogan, but never delivered until a backstage promo with Gene Okerlund. Then it was buy the PPV brother, and watch Hulkamania run wild. HBK didn't have to ****e himself out like Hogan. Talking about gay seems as though Hogan was the gay one, ripping his clothes off, constantly selling himself for PPv's, and all the while mainly aimed at young boys.

Let me clear the air here on Hulk Hogan for those of you who seem to be in the dark on this one. He is the biggest draw mainly due to the booming PPV era that he was a part of. Don't you all remember having to pay to see a Hogan match. You talk about all the Wrestlemanias he headlined, but what about all the house shows he never did? As I said what about having to pay to see Hogan live on PPV. HE HARDLY EVER DID LIVE SHOWS EITHER. The man thought he was the GOD of wrestling.

HBK started in the 80's. He paid his dues long before he won the World title. He had been a professional for nearly 10 years at that point. Name the last person that waited 10 years for a world title that is on this list other than Bret Hart? You talk about my claim to HBK not being injured, and holding off going to WCW while being under contract as a fluke. Funny, because it isn't a fluke.

Wrestling is a funny business. I suggest you do some research because I'm not going to debate this, as this is not a debate. You are just wrong. Who cares what Nash said in a shoot, he is friends with HBK, and he is part of the business. You know very little about the industry if you think that everything you hear is true. If HBK's back, or neck, or legs were that bad he would have never come back. No one with serious back problems retires from any sport, and then comes back. No, doctor would allow, and no man is that stupid to put their body in jeopardy like that.

Yes, HBK's back or body for that matter was probably beaten and worn. The year of his retirement he had been in the business 20 years. That is a long time for any physical sport. He saw his friends leaving for big money, and realized that Bret Hart at the time was not working with him. Hart didn't even want to put over Austin people! May I also remind you that Austin didn't want to put over Brock Lesnar. Anyhow, he saw all the money that his friends received, I'm sure it crossed his mind to leave as well. Don't you remember the talk of Vince looking to give Hart that 20 year contract?

I'm sure that talk of a 20 yr contract probably had been rumored for years backstage. It is probably a small reason as to why Hall, and Nash may have left. Feeling that there would be no room for them financially if Hart was going to get all this money with such a long term deal. I remember hearing from Vince's mouth on RAW with issue concerning Hart leaving. Hart never respected HBK because he didn't like him, and thats simple. HBK was selling T-shirts, and other hot merchandise at a time where heels weren't supposed to do such things.

His character stood out, and the only reason Hogan stood out other than on PPV was the fact that he was on STEROIDS just like everyone else he wrestled with. Hogan's look wasn't even natural. Not to mention he was a backstabbing hypocrite who preached one thing to kids, and did the other. He was in it for himself, and rightfully so. That is the story of the business. Hogan was preaching this, and saying that. Playing in rock videos with his band, and being in his own cartoon.

Don't give me this lame crap of Hogan's worth to the business. He was the biggest TOOL of all time. He was plugged every where. He was like the Kiss of the wrestling era, but he didn't have facepaint. Ofcourse when you are advertised everywhere, and are only on PPVs you are going to be huge. Hogan is the reason the WWE went from wrestling to entertainment.

HBK's character was able to keep within the wrestling genre while doing things in the ring that no one else has eer done prior to him. That is called pioneering people. Most of Hogan's success comes from commercials, movies, cartoons, appearances on talk shows, and endorsement ads. Hogan said this himself. When Vince says your the one that is basically a career in the making. HBK didn't receive this special treatment.

Michaels was who he always was. He wasn't telling us to do one thing, and then doing the other literally like Hogan. Shawn paid his dues, and his career was a story. HBK wasn't some cheap gimmick, and when I said his gimmick was for adults I was right. He didn't try to appeal to the fans with something like facepaint or silly one liners.

He carried Marty Jannet who was a nobody. Michaels was one of the most memorable IC champions of all time. As I said his career is a story, and an impressive one at that. You couldn't write a better story outside of Flair. In case you have forgot this was a thread on the greatest "wrestler" ever in professsional wrestling. Hogan could never wrestle with the best of them. His fame came off of the fact that he was an entertainment plug. He spent more time on private jets than he did wrestling in the ring, and that is actually fact that Hogan admitted to on a radio show. Research it for yourself.

Yes, HBK was probably a prick backstage, but who isn't. Wrestling is a cut throat business. Have you forgotten that principle? Hogan did sell out seats, and I'm not arguing that. However his appearances were rare, and in the late 80's early 90's you had to pay to see Hogan on PPV. People will draw to something that is forced down there throats in ads, commercials, T-shirts, foam hands, and religion. Hogan was preaching faith, but somehow breaking the law by using steroids. There were so many things that made up Hulk Hogan, and none of it was what he did in the ring.

Hogan has stated so many times that it was Andre's idea to lose to him at WM, and that he (Andre) made it clear that if he didn't want to do it he wouldn't have to. You all seem to forget how big of a star Andre was before Hogan made his debut in the WWF. Beating Andre was something that no one man had done. He was the man, and because of that Hogan's career took off. He beat the largest athlete in the world at the time in MSG.

Hogan was a great mind in marketing. He knew how to sell himself. It wasn't through wrestling in the ring that Hogan made his fortune. It was his ability to sell himself be it through tv shows, autographs, t-shirts etc.. Hogan is to wrestling what Cena will end up being. Cena is heading in the same direction as Hogan. He is doing "B" type movies, and his selling, selling, selling, and selling everything that has his name on it. I give more props to Cean because he goes on th road, and he does house shows. In my opinion Hogan can't even lace up Cena's high tops.

Cena is more of a wrestler than Hogan will ever be. HBK put everything he had every single night of the week. Had Shawn not retired Rock, Austin, and HHH would have had even more successful careers. Without HBK there would have been no Austin, or Rock. Both stars Austin/Rock knew that they had to change with business, just as HBK did in the early 90's when he broke from The Rockers. It was about change, and change Michaels created. He was the cause of the attitude era not Austin. At a time when Rock, and Austin were just mid card greats HBK was doing HIAC with Taker.

To suggest that HBK had no sort of impact that Hogan did is incredibly ignorant. HBK was part of a show called Monday Night RAW. His charcter was exactly that. Once again he stood out from all those weird, kid like characters that the WWE had palced out there. HBK was RAW, and the male audience hated him, and that is what made him great. You loved to hate him because he was what you weren't. His character was to do exactly what it made you do, hate him. No one liked him prnacing to the ring like a gay man.

You can think I'm a mark all you want. HBK's character is unmatched, and so is his story. Hogan doesn't have a story. He was just like a simple glimpse, and so many of you seem to think that he was this great wrestler? HBK was in those arena selling them out 3-4 times a week for over ten tears, and he is still putting on great matches today depsite his awful turn in character, a born again chrisitian. To this day he is still wrestling people, and keepin them 5 start matches. He has hardy missed a step. He is the Jerry Rice of his profession.

Speaking of promos HBK you say things that weren't supposed to be said. Hogan's promos up unitl the NWO were all lame. Just go and youtube some of his old school shit with Mean Gene. It was all bad acting, and cheesy just like the 80's were suppposed to be. Everything was in over drive because people thought that we were going to have a nuclear war with Russia. The WWE(F) always copies current day issues. Exp: Sgt Slaughters run while were in the war with Iraq.

Yiou never saw HBK running around with the American flag acting like some cheap poster boy for the good ol US of A. HBK took it a step further and whiped his ass with the Canadian flag. That was classic, and something Hogan's character never had the balls to do. Canada hated HBK for the longest time. Is there any part of the world that Hogan can lay that claim to. No one gets more heat in Montreal than HBK does.

He was part of one of the most taboo storylines of all time with the Montreal screwjob. It exposed wrestling for what it was. Tell me the last time Hogan had this kind of impact on the wrestling world. This Montreal screwjob is still specualated as a work, and others say it was real. Things like this didn't happen in Hogan's era. HBK was a part of a new wrestling that he helped influence more than Hogan ever did. Hogan never pioneered a match. That is important if you want to throw his name down for greatest wrestler of all time. What do you think?

Let us not also forget that HBK put tons of stars over. Perhaps Scott Hall raises an eyebrow, or even Kevin Nash. Without those two names being what they were what would the NWO have even been. Hall, and Nash worked plenty of mathces with one another. Nash/HBK rehashed friend v.s friend feud that Hogan/Savage had prior. Hall/HBK were a part of Ladder match history. Something Hogan would never have done. Both Nash/Hall were the stars they were because both men received rubs off of HBK.

When Nash/HBk had their feud it was one of the better feuds seen in a while. The story behind it was great. At one point even Sid got invovled. In fact it was so great that from that point on when ever a smaller guy with a little look to him, has a larger friend we all say it reminds them of HBK/Nash. Example Kendrick/Jackson. They were the first real interesting big guy, little guy pair. You can sit here and talk about HBK's title run being unsuccessful. You can think that all you want, but in comparison to whom, and what he was going up against it wasn't much.

He wrestled big guys who wrestled like they had two left feet, and made the match 5 star. Guys like Vader, Sid, Viscera etc.. Hogan could never do this. HBK was a and is a great wrestler. He was trained by Lou Thesz for chirst sake. He retired, and then came back. He faced a new batch of wrestlers, and still proved that he was still better than most if not all of them in the ring. That includes Eddie, Benoit, Kidman, HHH, Taker, Orton, Cena, Jericho, Angle, Edge, Jeff Hardy, RVD, etc... Hogan could never do this.

Cena didn't get to wrestle Hogan, but he did wrestle HBK and it was one if not the best match(es) he has ever had in his career as a professional. I bet if you asked Cena today who he felt he wrestled the best with, he would say Shawn Michaels. By the way HBK retired Ric Flair. As far as I'm concerned the former greatest of all time up until he retired, or was retired by HBK. :flair:
 
He won't be remembered as the best of all time, Hogan or Austin will forever hold that title. That being said he is probably the best pro-wrestler in the world today and for the last few years. Not because of his in-ring ability, although some people exaggerate about his lack of skill. It's not like he's awful, he just isn't as good as a lot of other guys. He does the same routine for a few months on end, adds in a new move, tweaks it, repeats, etc, but then again, didn't Austin, Rock, Hogan, Triple H and Undertaker?

At the end of the day he is the face of the wealthiest pro wrestling company in the world. He works harder than almost anyone. He fufills a lot of commitments outside of the ring and still turns up every week and at every PPV. He is probably the only new star made in the last 5 years that non-wrestling fans have heard of. I mean Undertaker might be more famous, but I would wager that's due to his fame during the attitude era and before.

Cena sells the most merchandise and he brings in the highest figures. He makes money for the company. He is Vince's favourite and he gets in no trouble. If wrestling had MVP's he'd probably win year in and year out. How well he can trade holds and counter-wrestle is not the point. How good his moves are is not the point. How funny he is is not the point. These are the things that the internet community judge a wrestler by, but they are not the mark of a good pro wrestler.

If you take the things people critique John Cena for and apply them to Hogan, he was an awful wrestler. But he is the most well-known name in the history of the industry and probably always will be. He made wrestling bigger than it was. He made it cool. Kids adored him as a hero. He brought in more money than anyone he faced or teamed with. He makes the roof come off any building he enters. Just look at Wrestlemania X8, they did absolutely everything they could to give The Rock sympathy and make him the face, but they booed him out of the building. Fans don't give a damn how well a guy can wrestle, they want characters, and Hogan had one.

By that same measurement, whilst it's nothing like the same scale, Cena is the top wrestler in the world. Wrestling itself just isn't as cool anymore. People know how it works, and television and films have evolved, leaving wrestling sort of exposed as fake. The audience just isn't going to be as big anymore. But of the people that do watch, the majority are watching because of Cena and people like him.

I myself don't really enjoy his work, but WWE don't care about me, they know I'm going to follow it regardless of what they put on, as will 90% of the people on this site. The people who complain about how bad he is are probably watching him every week regardless. My personal taste is irrelevent, because the majority of their audience haven't heard of Chris Hero, Roderick Strong and Bryan Danielson, so it doesn't matter how good I think they are. John Cena is a wrestling star, not a wrestler, but a star, and the top star in the industry.
 
First,

Cena being the eventual greatest wrestler of all time:

To me, I think it is recocl{ulous. I will say I do respect Cena for being so dedicated to the business and I truly do appreciate the fact he dedicates his body 300+ days a year to entertain us fans. (Albeit, he gets paid decent to do it) but unlike any other superstar I have seen this side of HHH, he gets FORCED down our throats like a vegetable when we were 4 years old. He seems to constantly always need a title to be over or gets forgotten by the more serious fan.

I agree with a few of you who have touched on the fact that Cena has really not had a true rival to make his career legendary, as all of the greats seem to have had at least one rival, where Steve Austin has had Vince, HHH, Rock, HBK, Bret Hart. Which only proves further that Austin is and always will be the greatest of all time BUT every great superstar has had their careers jump started by ANOTHER great. Would Austin have blown up to become the guy that saved WWF from WCW's nitro days IF Bret Hart didn't launch Austin? Austin became a hero over night because of Hart. The I QUIT match really turned Austin into a legend.

To me, Hogan, HBK, The Rock, Cena are ALL below STONE COLD STEVE AUSTIN and BRET HART. I can't believe I have barely seen any love for Hart. Think about the people Hart launched. Stone Cold, HBK, even feuds with Taker. And off of Hart launching them, Austin, and HBK launched each other, The Rock, HHH, DX, Vince, just to name a couple, all became legendary status all starting from Bret Hart, one way or another.

Which leads me to my conclusion of Cena.

The Jury is still out, but unless he starts getting decent feuds with the likes of other future stars such as Orton, Hardy and they turn into legendary rivals, I do not believe Cena will EVER be accepted as a WWE great.

By the way Irishcanadian, you sent me a message earlier this month that I just now saw, yes I am a huge Flyers fan!! sorry, I am still getting use to this forum stuff.
 
I'm kinda surprised by how high most people are rating Cena. While most seem to agree he wont be the greatest, the majority seems to think he will be in the top 10 or so. I think he is really being overrated. I dont want to repeat myself as I already posted why i think he isnt the best, but it seems like he is only popular with women and children, and is being kept at the top because of merchandise sells. I just took a quick look at WWEShop.com and he only has 1 item in the top 10 sellers right now, which is at #4. The #1 item is the new CD, followed by an Orton shirt. Orton has 2 items in the top 10, 3 if you count the CD selling primarily for his Theme being the focal point of it, and he is suppose to be a hated heel right now. Jeff Hardy has 4 items right now in the top 10 sellers, and I think if it wasnt for the fact he is kinda unreliable, he would be the top guy in the WWE. And really this whole argument depends on how you define the "greatest Wrestler of All time." If you are basing this on who is truly the best "wrestler" then I think you would have to go with either Bret or Kurt Angle. Cena on a technical level isnt anywhere close to their level. If you are talking about who did the most for the business, thats where you get into the argument for Hogan or Austin. And I just cant see what Cena could do right now that would drastically make an impact in wrestling history, short of jumping ship to TNA or some other company and making them true competition for the WWE possibly even becoming the #1 company like WCW was during the late 90's. But I really doubt Cena leaving would truly have that much of an impact the ratings.
 
Oh when we say best wrestler of all time we are definitely speaking of all around abilities because I think most of us would agree Hulk Hogan was never the best in ring wrestling technician. Kurt Angle would be a close #2 to Bret Hart. Hart was AMAZING. He would carry any wrestler in the same ring as him.

John Cena is hit or miss some nights he would carry a guy but then there is other nights when it looks like someone has to carry him.

IMO, he will NOT be the best all time and is quite over rated. Women and little kids are dictated by what the writers want most of the time. Even though women like Cena, I think they would boo him and cheer Orton for his looks IF Orton was the face.
 
#1a Hulk Hogan
#1b Steve Austin
#2 The Rock
then the rest................................
Andre The Giant, The Undertaker, Ric Flair, Randy Savage, Bret Hart, HBK, HHH, Bruno Sammartino, Lou Thez, Rick Rude, Ultimate Warrior, Goldberg, Kevin Nash, Scot Hall, Terry Funk, Dory Funk, Dusty Rhodes, Mick Foley, Kurt Angle, Roddy Piper, Sting, Chris Benoit, Eddie Guerrero, Superstar Billy Graham, Antonio Inoki, Great Muta, Kenta Kobashi, Vader, Stan Hansen, Brusier Brody, Curt Henning, DDP, Jake The Snake, Brock Lesnar, Tatsumi Fujinami, Riki Choshu, Masahiro Chono, Hiroshi Tanahashi, Shinya Hashimoto, Bam Bam Bigalow, Jeff Jarrett, Kensuke Sasaki, Hiroyoshi Tenzan, Jushin Liger, Scott Steiner, Lex Luger, John Cena, Randy Orton, Edge, Batista, Chris Jericho, Big Show, Mitsuharu Misawa, The Shiek, Rob Van Dam, Atsushi Onita, Davey Boy Smith, Dynamite Kid, Brian Pillman, Great Sasuke, Rey Mysterio, Genichiro Tenryu, Kerry Von Erich, Giant Baba, Rikidōzan, Ted Dibiase, Ricky Steamboat, Mil Máscaras, Jimmy Snuka, Yokozuna,Gene Kiniski, Harley Race, JBL, Jeff Hardy,Carlos Colón, Sid Vicious, Booker T.



To the obsessed HBK fan you dont have a fucking clue, get a grip, the way your going on you would have me think HBK is responsible for everything that happended in wrestling. GET OFF HIS DICK and get a life.
 
#1a Hulk Hogan
#1b Steve Austin
#2 The Rock
then the rest................................
Andre The Giant, The Undertaker, Ric Flair, Randy Savage, Bret Hart, HBK, HHH, Bruno Sammartino, Lou Thez, Rick Rude, Ultimate Warrior, Goldberg, Kevin Nash, Scot Hall, Terry Funk, Dory Funk, Dusty Rhodes, Mick Foley, Kurt Angle, Roddy Piper, Sting, Chris Benoit, Eddie Guerrero, Superstar Billy Graham, Antonio Inoki, Great Muta, Kenta Kobashi, Vader, Stan Hansen, Brusier Brody, Curt Henning, DDP, Jake The Snake, Brock Lesnar, Tatsumi Fujinami, Riki Choshu, Masahiro Chono, Hiroshi Tanahashi, Shinya Hashimoto, Bam Bam Bigalow, Jeff Jarrett, Kensuke Sasaki, Hiroyoshi Tenzan, Jushin Liger, Scott Steiner, Lex Luger, John Cena, Randy Orton, Edge, Batista, Chris Jericho, Big Show, Mitsuharu Misawa, The Shiek, Rob Van Dam, Atsushi Onita, Davey Boy Smith, Dynamite Kid, Brian Pillman, Great Sasuke, Rey Mysterio, Genichiro Tenryu, Kerry Von Erich, Giant Baba, Rikidōzan, Ted Dibiase, Ricky Steamboat, Mil Máscaras, Jimmy Snuka, Yokozuna,Gene Kiniski, Harley Race, JBL, Jeff Hardy,Carlos Colón, Sid Vicious, Booker T.



To the obsessed HBK fan you dont have a fucking clue, get a grip, the way your going on you would have me think HBK is responsible for everything that happended in wrestling. GET OFF HIS DICK and get a life.

You have Jake ahead of Jeff Hardy and Edge? With all due respect, if you are going to talk about all around, with title wins and all, Jake the Snake is NOT on either one of their levels. Edge is already a 7 time champ with a handful of tag titles. I could be wrong, but I don't think Jake ever even help the world title.
 
Janetty being kicked through glass certainly was different...but it didnt start the attitude era. The fact you think that shows how ignorant you are on the matter. Can you name anything else that was even mildly "contraversial" that happened from then until 96/97?
And he didnt do it to start a new attitude era, it was angled so it would make him look like a total bastard, and make him a full fledged heel. Thats all.

I do not believe everything i read or hear about in the business, but i highly doubt Vince would pay Michaels NOT to wrestle. If his back was in a bad way, hed give him 2 years off tops, then bring him back.

When did Bret ever not want to put Austin over? where do you get this info from? Because i can bet a pound to a penny that you are making that up, like half of this other tripe you come out with.

And another flaw, Vince didnt talk about giving Bret a 20 year contract...he HAD a 20 year contract signed in late 1996 with a 1 year get out clawse. Bret went to WCW because Vince couldnt afford to pay him, and Vince told him to go to WCW as that contract he had been given would be recinded and the clawse would be taken into effect.

The reason Hogan got advertised everywhere is because people seriously loved him, and the E used that to their advantage and made him even bigger. Are you trying to tell me if i was Vince and i stuck Shannon Moore everywhere and pushed him to the moon then he would become bigger than Hogan, Rock and Austin...No he wouldnt.

Hogan wasnt the reason wwe went from wrestling to sports entertainment. that was vinces decision, he just used Hogan to spearhead it and build it around him, which is just good business.

You keep refering to HBK as if he had choice in his characters, he didnt. Vince made his characters, not him, he just ran with it. Talkiing all this bollocks about how he stayed himself and didnt wear facepaint. The reason for that was Vince didnt want him to wear facepaint.

what do you mean he carried Marty? what in the rockers? if so then no he didnt carry Marty, Marty himself is a fantastic wrestler who can put on a great match. That match he had with Angle a few years back was awesome. and that wasnt just Angle carrying him through. But i dont see how you think he carried Marty. HBK was simply just the break out star, Like Bret, Edge, Jeff Hardy, and more recent John Morrison.

No people will not draw to something thats shoved down their throats. Hence John Cena, i believe the reason people dislike him is more the fact hes shoved down our throats than his actual wrestling skill.


"To suggest that HBK had no sort of impact that Hogan did is incredibly ignorant. HBK was part of a show called Monday Night RAW. His charcter was exactly that. Once again he stood out from all those weird, kid like characters that the WWE had palced out there. HBK was RAW, and the male audience hated him, and that is what made him great. You loved to hate him because he was what you weren't. His character was to do exactly what it made you do, hate him. No one liked him prnacing to the ring like a gay man."

I actually agree with you there

at a time Austin and Rock were midcarders HBK was main eventing? WTF kind of argument is that. In that case, HBK was getting his arse fired from WWF when Hogan and Warrior were Main eventing shows.

seriously...what the hell....

Without HBK they're would be no rock or austin? erm...take your head out of Shawns arse for a moment, you might see what the real world looks like.

You can think I'm a mark all you want.

Dont worry, i will

Is there any part of the world that Hogan can lay that claim to. No one gets more heat in Montreal than HBK does.

Im sure if it had been HHH, or any other members of Shawns "clique" the reaction would be worse. thats just a matter of who was involved with the screwjob. not because of his character.

Hogan never pioneered a match? WHAT THE HELL. watch a dvd of a very old event called WRESTLEMANIA III. Then you will see what pioneering a match is.

can you name any other wrestler pre 2002 than HBK put over? other than members of his clique and his friends? hmmm....1 guy i remember, and that was Austin.

How can you call Vader a bad worker? he was one of the most hard working better big men in this industry. And he never put a 5 star match with Sid, Viscera or any other big man tbh. He can carry guys through, but i doubt anyone can carry those to 5 star mate.

Cena probabaly would say Michaels, But so what? Most wrestlers in the main event level have fantastic matches, Ask Angle about his Fav match and he'd probabaly say Taker, Ask Flair and he'd probabaly say Sting. Its all about preferences. Just because Cenas fav match was against HBK means zilch.

And once again, Michaels didnt retire Flair, Flair retired...it was his decision to, and it was his decision to have 1 final match with Michaels. You talk about it like its real. And you sit there calling others ignorant...jeesh



AND SILROCK, i think Obamartins has just listed them as hes seen fit, not in any order. i may be wrong though


*sorry for the red writing, for some reason it isnt letting me quote individual messages*
 
Cena is nowhere near the level that Austin, Hogan, or The Rock were at the top of their respective popularity and he isn't close to Brett Hart, Benoit, or HBK in their technical skills. Isn't that how you rate a wrestler? Their charactor skills and their wrestling skills. Since Cena isn't in the top three in either catagory, then how can you even have him in the "greatest wrestler" conversation. There are several other wrestlers in general that I consider better than him including The Undertaker, Flair and even Triple H. Yet, I will admit that time will tell. It is too soon to definitly say, but, WWE have to stop pushing him down our throats with him doing the same crap all the time. They should turn him heel and see if he can run with that for awhile. Since half the crowd hate him anyway. I think if they did that, he has the potential to be one of the greatest heels ever.
 
You have Jake ahead of Jeff Hardy and Edge? With all due respect, if you are going to talk about all around, with title wins and all, Jake the Snake is NOT on either one of their levels. Edge is already a 7 time champ with a handful of tag titles. I could be wrong, but I don't think Jake ever even help the world title.

I never put the huge list of wrestlers names in order. But anyhow Jake The Snake was one of the biggest stars of the Hogan era & the fact that he did not hold the world title means he was over enough that he did not NEED the title & it was the same with Piper they did not need Titles to be over. Roddy Piper lost about 1 match in 15 years including his matches against Hogan.
 
I have not posted in a long time but I had to chime in on this topic....

A lot of people seem to not like Cena. However a lot of people DO. He entertains people every week and puts on a great show no matter who he is up against whether it is someone great like Edge or someone who sucks like JBL. He always makes the match out to look like it will be great, and it usually is. His match against HBK at wrestlemania 23 is the best match I have ever seen.

I sat down for the past hour or so and read every single post in this topic. The general consensus appears to be that the best of the best are Hogan, Stone Cold, and the Rock. While some are defending Cena and others are behind HBK or (insert other names here).

The vast majority of the wrestlers who have been brought up in this topic have either already reached their prime or are not active anymore, if not both. That includes the big three of Hogan, Stone Cold, and the Rock. They are not active anymore. Guys like Cena still are. Which brings me to my big point and one that has already been argued to an extent. Cena's currently in his prime and has not peaked yet, he has plenty of time left to become an even bigger name than he already is.

Cena is the one who got me into wrestling as a hardcore fan. I knew who Hogan was when I was a little kid, I knew who Stone Cold and the Rock were when I was in middle school, but I was never a hardcore fan of wrestling until my first year of college, which was when John Cena became a big name. My roommate told me I should come watch Cena's match, I did and I have been a huge fan ever since.

Someone already pointed out the similarities between Cena now and Hogan from long ago. Think about it. I'm sure that 20 or so years ago there were people who were not kids that weren't interested in Hogan, but he made a lot of kids fans and they grew up and are still fans now. Sure there are lots of kids in Cena's fanbase, but they will grow up and continue to be fans, just like Hogan's fans did way back when.... and not all of Cena's fans are kids or girls, I am a 23 year old male and Cena is my favorite in WWE right now (tied with Orton.)

Somebody else pointed out that all Cena needs is a "legendary" feud in order to achieve mega-fame.... We all know about Austin VS McMahon, and stuff like that. Cena HAS had a lot of great feuds. Maybe not anything as big as Austin/McMahon was, but they have been good. Cena/Edge, Cena/HBK, Cena/Orton, heck even Cena/Lashley were all very entertaining feuds, and we are about to see Cena/Orton once again. Both of them have improved since their feud last time, and I think this will be the biggest feud in many years. I am looking forward to their wrestlemania match and I will be there to see it!

This is getting too long so I'll sum up what little I had left to say. Cena's likely got a lot of time left before he's gone, and considering 1- what he's achieved as of RIGHT NOW, along with 2- what he has the potential to do in the future, put those two together and YES he does have the potential to go down as one of the greatest ever.

Will he be better than anyone else? We can't see the future, people. Only time will tell.
 
I have a feeling Cena will be one of the greatest if not the greatest. A lot of people compare him to the Rock, but think about it. Cena didn't come from a family of wrestlers. Just the fact that he loves the business and will do anything for it makes him great. Like JR always says, "Love him or hate him..."
 
Cena will be one of the greatest for multiple reasons

1.) He has turned the business around, from a show with ****e, drugs and alcohol to a show that children can watch and love. Imagine if a new body guard on Jerry Springer changed the show so much that parents were alright with their kids watching?

2.) He is a respectable hero. Hulk Hogan was a hero, and he is the only hero in the WWE history that can live up to Cena's. Austin isn't a real hero. He is a drunk who beats up everyone. I sure wouldn't want my kid growing up to be like him.

3.) He is the leading man of his time. Just like Hogan and Austin, Cena has led the WWE for a long time already, and will keep leading them. This brings me to my next point

4.) He will have a long career. He is in good shape, doesn't get injured much, and works nicely in the ring for a man who isn't known for his moves. Austin couldn'd help his neck being broken or the bad knees, but Austin has the advantage.

5.) He is loyal to the WWE. There is no chance he is going to fuck the WWE over, like Hogan did in the early 90s, or someone like the Rock did when he went to Hollywood.

6.) He has expanded his legacy. Like Hogan did and Austin didn't do as much, Cena is everywhere, he is in the media, always good reviews, he is in movies, he had an album, he is expanding the product.

7.) Cena already has some great wins in his career, over people like Michaels, HHH, Orton and many other of the top stars. He is creating history in the ring, and it will continue, from Wrestlemania 25 and on.
 
I dont think he has changed the business around, but tbh, as it has changed it to a more younger viewing audience type show, (which it is now, im not debating that, im debating whether cena has turned the business around) IMO thats a bad thing. WWE's ratings are on the level they were in 92 - 96, and no one can say those years were good for the WWE, so how has him turning the business around been a good thing? if in fact thats what he has done.

Yes he is the leading star at the moment, but he will only be known that to the casual WWE audience who will be told that. Anyone that watches his matches 20 years from now wont agree.

In Hogan there was this larger than life character that everyone loved and couldnt be beaten.

In Hart there was his Technical ability and excellent Psychology

Michaels was the full package.

Austin had the greatest fued in history. And had arguable the best character in history too

The Rock became so big he transcended WWE and made it huge.

Cena has none of that listen above, not everyone loves him as half the country boo him, isnt a full package, doesnt have great psychology, His character and acting skills are unbelievable at times, and Cena doesnt have the acting skills to make it big in hollywood, hes mediocre at best with acting.

So unless something changes, only among WWE will he be remembered for greatness, Fans that appriciate more than what Cena does wont.
 
To me cena would be popular as Hogan but not a revolution-nator. Cena hasnt had any big time memorable feuds. He has done nothing to change the course of wrestling. Hogan brought wrestling to mainstream audience to take notice. Austin made it edgier - the rock, HHH, mankind, taker..... pushed the boundary further. All cena does is hold wwe in the limelight. He Hasnt done anything appealing since his rapper gimmick and has gone dry and stale. Y people really love him? i dont know. To me, cena is a medicore upper midcarder.

Side note - if cena is the champion, why the fuck is he in the elimination chamber? Isnt it for someone to earn a title shot?
 
Flip a coin gentlemen.

This could go either way. I am indifferent to Cena now a days. I do not have a problem with him as much as I used to because they write much better for him. That having been said, I do believe it is possible for him to equate the same status as Hogan. But for that to happen, he has to have almost everyone on his side and he needs to go trhough a few good storylines and a good world title feud with a strong rival. Every good player or team is defined by the player or team that they fight and Cena will need a strong rival to carry it out like Austin had with Rock or Rock had with Triple-H. I would say Orton is the perfect counterpart to Cena because they do not have to always be fighting yet they can stay in each other's realm. But yes Cena does stand a chance of becoming something big. But for now, Hulk Hogan and Austin will always be remembered for making wrestling big or saving it.
 
LOL Cena Mark.

Cena is good on paper, and gets the marks from all the kiddies.
Has multiple title reigns but as mentioned earlier who in this current era doesn't.

Edge now is on his 7 world title run. Which goes to show jsut cause you are a champ doesn't mean you are the greatest, that withstanding due to the impact both from marks and the haters, he'll definately get into the Hall of Fame at some point barring a stupid action on his behalf,

I kinda think though that he will end up going the movie route like The Rock/Austin. Why wouldn't he? they make far more money in a shorter amount of time and don't have to put there body on the lines. So 10-15 good yrs ahead of him, I doubt it, none of the current guys can expect that longegivity at the top the toll on the body would be just far too great . Give it another 5 yrs at most and he'll be gone from regular participation.

then we can all start chanting "You Can't See Me" and it will be true. :)
 
John Cena sux. :undertaker2: I mean, obviously. Let's take a look, shall we?

He's been the longest reigning Champion since quite possibly Hulk Hogan. He's sold-out more arenas than quite possibly any other individual currently in the company. He sells way more merch. than everyone else, even if he has more, that doesn't truly mean anything as people are still buying the shit. He's been a constant staple for the company through movies, music, and anything else you could possibly imagine. He's the unofficial poster boy for the Industry itself right now, much less the W.W.E. in general.

So yeah.. he sucks. :rolleyes:

I used to dispise John Cena, but someone by the name of C.M. Punk made me realise just how much Cena actually deserves his Main Event spot. Sure he does the same thing a lot, but in the end, who really doesn't? Noone can give me any one other Superstar, who doesn't do the same thing over and over. Be it through their moveset, their promos, or the way they carry themselves. It's called "their gimmick".

When Punk was a Champion, through my eyes he almost destroyed everything John Cena had built for Raw, much less the Heavyweight Championship's credibility. Cena is the constant underdog throughout everything, even if he's always winning. Why? Because he's the guy in the company everyone wants to defeat, to make a name for themselves. So he has a constant target on his back.

Triple H. has political issues, along with Shawn Michaels. You can factor them in, but neither of them have truly done what Cena has, in the same period of time, much less a larger period. The Undertaker is a cornerstone in the company, but his time is drawing to a close and in the end.. only WrestleMania means anything for Taker. Cena is a 365 days a year type of spectacle.

The future seems to be in the hands of guy's like C.M. Punk, John Morrison, Ted DiBiase, Cody Rhodes, Mr. Kennedy, M.V.P., and possibly Edge, depending on how many more injuries he suffers.

But in the end, outside of maybe Edge.. none of those other's will even come near the type of overall success that John Cena has amassed. Face it boys and girls. John Cena isn't Hulk Hogan, but he's the next biggest thing since.
 
I don't Like John Cena, but I do admit he is gonna be considered one of the biggest stars of all time. But to even put him in the same category as Austin or Hogan is ridiculous. We all know that Hogan helped put wrestling on the map and made wrestling what it is today. He held all the major records in wrestling in terms of drawing, merchandise, you name it, until Austin came along and broke all of them. If it wasn't for Austin, WWE would of probably folded from being pounded by WCW in the ratings war for so long. Austin 3:16 not only saved wrestling, but brought in ratings that Cena can only dream of. It was the biggest era in pro wrestling history, Austin made wrestling "the cool thing to be into" during his time. At the end of the day, Cena might be equal to or surpass The Rock, but neither of them will be in the same category as Hulk Hogan or Austin.
 
I don't Like John Cena, but I do admit he is gonna be considered one of the biggest stars of all time. But to even put him in the same category as Austin or Hogan is ridiculous.

I think you're being a slight bit naive to think that John Cena couldn't surpass Hulk Hogan or Steve Austin.

At the end of the day, John Cena is doing far more than Austin did. And he's on par to being this Generation's Hulk Hogan.

What exactly do you think Austin did that Cena hasn't or can't do? They've both made movies. Cena's actually sold better to my knowledge. They've both been the top guy in the company. Cena is actually doing a better job at carrying it, due to all the personal attacks by outside influences.

Back during Austin's era, W.C.W. was the major opponent, but even Eric Bischoff stated they didn't have a true shot at winning the war, because they didn't have proper people in the right spots to know what to do.

As far as Hulk Hogan, Cena is on-par to accomplishing everything Hogan has. And Wrestling is gaining more attention and media in today's Generation than I believe it did then. Which, would by rights.. make Cena better.

We all know that Hogan helped put wrestling on the map and made wrestling what it is today. He held all the major records in wrestling in terms of drawing, merchandise, you name it, until Austin came along and broke all of them.

I'm unsure if Steve Austin broke all of Hogan's records. Least of which I'm very sure he didn't break all of Hogan's drawing records. Merch. maybe, but only once again because during Austin's era 90% of his shirts were offensive and that's what people loved.

Yet once again. John Cena has done both the offensive merch. and the children's merch. He's continuing to sell massively, and my guess is he's surpassing Austin as we speak, on his way to topping Hogan too.

If it wasn't for Austin, WWE would of probably folded from being pounded by WCW in the ratings war for so long. Austin 3:16 not only saved wrestling, but brought in ratings that Cena can only dream of.

Negative. Steve Austin was one name in the company. A big name, and an important name.. but still just one. The Rock was a major player that helped Austin continue to get over, once his attitude ran low.

Meanwhile, Cena is single-handedly carrying the W.W.E. out of the slumps of the Benoit murder case, the steroid scandal, and every other negative issue that's been thrown in their way. I'd say that tops a rival Wrestling company any day of the week.

It was the biggest era in pro wrestling history, Austin made wrestling "the cool thing to be into" during his time. At the end of the day, Cena might be equal to or surpass The Rock, but neither of them will be in the same category as Hulk Hogan or Austin.

Have to continue disagreeing. While Steve Austin did his part in making Wrestling interesting during the late 90's, he didn't do it alone.

John Cena isn't exactly doing it alone either, yet he's the only main point of interest when it comes to selling to a younger generation.
 
Alright, I'm a little bit flustered as to how anyone came up with this insane theory of Cena being the greatest of all time. Slyfox went on about John Cena getting over by actually being a good wrestler, while Austin got over by being, well, "Stone Cold" (beer, fingers, etc.) Which I think is one of the most unusually batty arguments I think I've ever heard in my life. 1) Cena is a fairly inadequate wrestler that has become the mold for the next generation of Headlock warriors out there. I live in Tampa and go to the FCW shows, and while some of these guys are great (Nic Nemeth/Dolph Ziggler, Joe Hennig) a lot of it is an exercise in Cena's style of wrestling: nothing particularly technical or advanced, just a series of simple moves (headlocks, armdrags, scoop slams) with about two or three "specialty" things thrown in the mix. Cena is such a boring wrestler to watch, I fell asleep when he wrestled Shawn Michaels and that should be impossible. 2) Austin was exciting to watch in the ring, even if he wasn't in the league of his rivals vis-a-vis in-ring abilities.

Moving on, since I'm the type of wrestling fan whose top 5 guys of all time includes Psicosis, I understand that this "greatest of all-time" list is kind of beyond my ken. Generally speaking, I've always preferred Savage to Hogan, Owen to Bret, hell, I even preferred Stevie Ray to Booker T. But my lack of bias (i.e. don't particularly like any of them) might be worth something.

Unfortunately I think Austin's out of the running. I think Austin was more talented in ring than Hogan (because who isn't) but when you're talking about the "greatest of all-time" obviously in-ring ability isn't a factor. If you want to go by merch sales, Cena's finally beat out Austin, but on the other end of things, I saw a kid once at the store who was head-to-toes cena gear, I'm talking hat, shirt, shoes, socks. I think there are just more options nowadays for selling shtuff to parents to satisfy their demonic cenabytes (yeah, that's right, I made a hell-raiser pun). Austin had the Attitude era while WWE was in the middle of getting beat up in the ratings by WCW and the NWO, and in that time frame, there just wasn't a lot of good wrestlers in the WWE, and obviously that era counts for something, it brought us DX (two guys who are still in the main events) and further redefinitions for the Undertaker (which has got to be the most successful gimmick in the history of wrestling), but in the long run, say ten years down the road, I don't particularly think Austin is going to get the same recognition that guys like Flair and Hogan still receive today.

I've got to admit that, if we're talking from purely a revenue-generating standpoint, Cena's already surpassed everybody and it looks like, barring a career-ending injury (which I'll admit, I keep my fingers crossed) there is definitely potential for Cena to make that "greatest" list. But that's kind of like predicting GWB to become president back in 1998; just because you're right, SlyFox, doesn't necessarily say as much about Cena as it does about the new generation of wrestling fans (i.e. annoying stupid kids that don't even know a thing about NWO or Attitude).

Also, let's not forget that Cena's gimmick is essentially "Good Vibrations" era Marky Mark. While it's interesting to consider the further possibilities of bringing back early 90s rap (Kofi Kingston wearing a dashiki with an Africa pendant anybody?) Unless you're the Undertaker, how far can you really take a hokey gimmick and presume success? I already get made fun of by my friends for wearing jean shorts that go to my calves, but what can I say, I'm too broke to update my wardrobe from high school. His new slogan is this "Hustle. Loyalty. Respect" which I think is ridiculous for a number of reasons, most important of which, I don't think we should teach the youth of America that hustling is as important as loyalty and respect. A better trinity would be "Hustle, gank, participate in domestic violence (slap a ho)" or on the alternate end "hard-work, loyalty, respect". I understand that there is an alternate usage of the word "hustle" to mean, like in football practice" to "put forth effort", but that doesn't make it an appropriate word to use. For instance, I work in guest services, which involves a lot of talking, but I wouldn't say I service guests with my mouth, because that's inappropriate. Find a different word to mean what you're trying to say. Also, and this is nitpicking I suppose, but grammatically "hustle loyalty respect" is poor. Loyalty and Respect are both character traits (and nouns). It would make more sense to substitute a word for hustle (v.) that is a character trait without negative connotations.

Okay, that was an unnecessary tangent. My apologies. To discuss Cena seriously (a term I'm hesitant to use in a conversation like this) about being a contender for the greatest of all time there are just too many barriers to overtake:

People have brought this up plenty of times and some of you act like it doesn't matter, but I've gone to plenty of live events when WWE comes to Florida and the people who don't like Cena are a lot louder than the people who do. I'm not saying there are more of us, I'm just saying we're louder....a lot louder. Austin, Hogan, and the Rock, even during some of their heel bouts, never had as loud of a portion of fans so fervently against them as Cena has now as a face. Although, for Austin, I'm pretty sure people didn't boo him just because they were afraid of getting their *ss-kicked by rednecks in the parking lot. Although, I should stipulate that, again, I live in Tampa, and we have a tendency to hate anybody who gets pushed down our throat even aside from pro wrestling. Plain and simply, I can't imagine how Cena could really break that barrier considering how much people really hate him. Ten years ago we could have been having this debate about Goldberg, and we probably did on some forum somewhere. A lot of people hated Goldberg, of course WCW didn't know this because most of us started going back to WWE. People blame WWE for burying Goldberg but the reality of what happened is that Goldberg buried himself by annoying the crap out of us and the WWE got rid of him (bravo, VKM, thanks for listening to us every once in a while). Cena is walking that same line. Say, purely theoretically, TNA bought out WWE (a stretch) do you think Cena would still be the go-to guy? No way, between the people who started watching TNA to get away from guys like Cena and the people who already hate Cena, he'd never get enough people over. Of course, this is a backwards way of getting my point across that Goldberg will never be considered the greatest because too many people hated him as a face, the same will inevitably apply to Cena. Unless...

... a heel turn. I think Cena needs to, like many have said, take a heel turn and show us that all the cotton-candy crap that comes out of his mouth isn't just rainbows and sunshine. I think it will be sooner than later, especially with the potential of either Jericho or Orton to go anti-hero (which I expect by wrestlemania). But then again, I expected Batista to have a heel turn about three years ago and that hasn't happened yet. Cena might fall into that boat with Sting that most fans might just not buy a heel turn. I'm curious to see how the guys who already hate him as a face will react. I know for my part, I will just try to ignore him or cheer for whoever he's facing, but refrain from booing Cena.

Finally, Cena needs to help the final product aside from generating revenue and bringing viewers. Sure, it's hard to justify that there is more to wrestling than revenue and viewers. But there was a long time where Cena was out and what did we get? Great matches and storylines between Jericho and Michaels. Plain and simply, Cena just sucks to build a storyline around. We had a short thing between him and Jericho, which was good, but only because Jericho carried the whole thing on his shoulders. Cena doesn't have good storylines, because all he does is come out and "service" the fans. He spends too much time doting on their attention to actually get involved with inter-wrestler relations. People say he needs to have a rival, but I'm suggesting that he can't have one. He just doesn't get involved with people. We've talked alot about Michaels on this thread, and one of Michaels biggest selling points is that he commits himself to storylines. JBL should be kissing Michaels feet right now for putting him over in this stupid angle, but the point is that the angle is getting over primarily due to Michaels selling the angle. Cena can't do that; he's appeared throughout whole career to be completely incapable of developing angles with people. There isn't any emotion to him, he doesn't get angry or frustrated or sympathetic with others, he just goes out and sells to the fans. Do you think he could have substituted Michaels in his feud with Jericho or JiBLets? Absolutely not.

To summarize, if Cena can take a heel turn, work an angle with an Anti-Hero Jericho or Orton, and make it work, maybe, just maybe, we can put him in the category of greats. But that's such a stretch of the imagination that I just can't possibly fathom it working. I don't think he'll be able to sell an angle, I don't think he could pull off a good heel turn, and I definitely don't think he'll ever be able to appease, or even quiet, those that genuinely don't want to watch him in their programming.

That leaves us with Hogan or Flair, the same argument we've been having the past twenty years. Hogan helped make wrestling mainstream, but Flair was much more important to developing wrestling as an experience, as a show, as a product. The funny thing is, nobody we've talked about aside from HBK is actually a GOOD WRESTLER, so however we want to rank everybody is kind of superfluous to me.
 
Cena will be one of the greatest for multiple reasons

1.) He has turned the business around, from a show with ****e, drugs and alcohol to a show that children can watch and love. Imagine if a new body guard on Jerry Springer changed the show so much that parents were alright with their kids watching?

2.) He is a respectable hero. Hulk Hogan was a hero, and he is the only hero in the WWE history that can live up to Cena's. Austin isn't a real hero. He is a drunk who beats up everyone. I sure wouldn't want my kid growing up to be like him.

3.) He is the leading man of his time. Just like Hogan and Austin, Cena has led the WWE for a long time already, and will keep leading them. This brings me to my next point

4.) He will have a long career. He is in good shape, doesn't get injured much, and works nicely in the ring for a man who isn't known for his moves. Austin couldn'd help his neck being broken or the bad knees, but Austin has the advantage.

5.) He is loyal to the WWE. There is no chance he is going to fuck the WWE over, like Hogan did in the early 90s, or someone like the Rock did when he went to Hollywood.

6.) He has expanded his legacy. Like Hogan did and Austin didn't do as much, Cena is everywhere, he is in the media, always good reviews, he is in movies, he had an album, he is expanding the product.

7.) Cena already has some great wins in his career, over people like Michaels, HHH, Orton and many other of the top stars. He is creating history in the ring, and it will continue, from Wrestlemania 25 and on.

With all due respect, TM Punk. The BIGGEST difference between Cena and Hogan/Austin/Rock is this. Austin and company were the FACES of wrestling when wrestling was bringing in 7.0 - 8.5 weekly Raw/Nitro ratings.

Cena is the face of Raw when the shows are LUCKY to break 3.4 .

Cena can take the next 20 years and still wouldn't sell as much as Austin did.
 
As for those who think Cena is anywhere near Austins marketing numbers you are OUT of your mind. Austin CRUSHED Hogans records, it would take Cena as I stated about 20 years at this rate to touch Austins numbers. WWE/WWF average a near 7.0 MILLION viewers a NIGHT to Cenas minuscule 3.3 rating average the WWE has had over Cenas tenure .

If you doubt it, research and make yourselves feel silly.
 
TheOneBigWill,

It is clear to me your WWE/WWF history is very off base and I believe you didn't even watch wrestling back then and I try to type this with no disrespect as I am new to this board and do NOT want to offend anyone.

You made a statement about the Rock carrying Austin. Ok, you do realize Austin put Rock on the map right? Rock was with the nation of domination and Austin feuded with him to build Rock, and then there was a point where Austin GAVE The Rock the IC belt and Austin left Rock behind and went on to battle Michaels for the WWF title at the time. So please get your story straight with that.

You honestly believe Cena has made more money and sold more merch than Austin??? You need to do a little research before you throw your ignorant biased generation opinion on this board. JERRY THE KING on a RECENT Raw mentioned that NO ONE has SOLD like Austin did for the company.

Again, if this comes off disrespectful, I apologize, I get frustrated when Cena marks think Cena did anything for the company more than what Hogan or Austin have.
 
TheOneBigWill,

It is clear to me your WWE/WWF history is very off base and I believe you didn't even watch wrestling back then and I try to type this with no disrespect as I am new to this board and do NOT want to offend anyone.

:lmao: Don't worry, I won't get offended easily because you're debating me. I'm open to it.

You made a statement about the Rock carrying Austin. Ok, you do realize Austin put Rock on the map right? Rock was with the nation of domination and Austin feuded with him to build Rock, and then there was a point where Austin GAVE The Rock the IC belt and Austin left Rock behind and went on to battle Michaels for the WWF title at the time. So please get your story straight with that.

First and foremost, I'm pretty sure I never said The Rock carried Steve Austin. I believe I said the Rock helped Steve Austin, continue his stride. In other words, when Austin began slowly down.. The Rock came in to be his equal as far as matches, fan support, etc. went. Thus, The Rock helped Steve Austin to pull the load of the company.

You're absolutely right, Steve Austin did help make the Rock who he was. But the Rock in turn helped Steve Austin stay afloat by feuding with him later, when both were huge names.

Rest assured, my story has always been straight.

You honestly believe Cena has made more money and sold more merch than Austin??? You need to do a little research before you throw your ignorant biased generation opinion on this board. JERRY THE KING on a RECENT Raw mentioned that NO ONE has SOLD like Austin did for the company.

Hmmm, and you don't just out of shear curiousity think that maybe Jerry Lawler was plugging that because Steve Austin was recently brought up as an inductee for the up-coming Hall of Fame?

You know, about how J.R. & The King used to always say "This is the greatest Pay per view ever, I've never witnessed anything like it, nothing can top this." Only to same the exact same thing a month later at the following ppv?

I'm the wrong guy to look at for crunching numbers. But someone by the name of Slyfox will most definately find his way into this thread and correct you if you are indeed wrong. (which I'm not saying you are, as I just said I'm going off opinion, not fact.. but Sly knows the numbers/merch. sales better than anyone)

Again, if this comes off disrespectful, I apologize, I get frustrated when Cena marks think Cena did anything for the company more than what Hogan or Austin have.

ROFL This makes me laugh more than anything. Because I defend John Cena for being a great wrestler.. it makes me a Cena mark. One thing I'll let you slide on is the fact that you're new to the forum.

But if you do a little bit of checking, you'll actually notice I'm anything but a Cena mark. Infact, I couldn't stand the guy for the longest time. Still can't in some aspects. But I respect what he's done, and I'm voicing my opinion as such.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top