It didn't take long for WWE to mock Lawler. | Page 3 | WrestleZone Forums

It didn't take long for WWE to mock Lawler.

Is anyone really that upset or are you guys just outraged for the sake of being outraged? If the footage of Lawler getting cpr is real then yeah, that's odd that they kept filming. I was actually wondering while watching if they had filmed it tonight with the ambulance they had
in the building. Either way, was it in bad taste? Maybe. Does it really matter in the grand scheme of things? I don't think so.
 
How do you know Lawler didn't go to Vince with this idea? Maybe Vince was uncomfortable with it but agreed to it because it's what Lawler wanted. You guys are making way too much out of this. Lawler is a 40 year pro. Quit acting like he's a victim and needs your protection. He would probably be more insulted by that than anything that was said tonight.

You are right, things like this have been around for decades. Didn't Ric Flair fake a heart attack in WCW? Correct me if im wrong, but I think Andre the Giant did aswell at some point?

I'm not bothered with the whole "Heyman faked a heart attack" Yea, it's tasteless and Lawler would of agreed to it. It's not like he wasnt forced into this segment. The only thing that bothers me is watching Lawler nearly die on Live TV. I mean it's a PG Show now, little kids are going to see that. It was so uneasy and awkward. I Mean we heard the guy having his attack through his headset but I just can't believe they would record that.. imagine if he did die and they recorded the whole thing? THAT'S disgusting. Heyman was getting cheap heat, no big deal. People do that all the time, remember the Randy Orton & Rey Mysterio fued with Orton saying Eddie was in hell? (God rest his soul)

Oh, and before WrestleMania 27, Micheal Cole mocked King's recently departed Mother! So im sure Lawler was fine with Heyman and Punk doing that.
 
Am I the only one who remembers May Young and Mark Henry having sex, or for that matter Hunter sexing up a corpse on WWE TV. Oh and Vince going through a theratical JR colon and pulling out all kinds?

These are just some of the things that the WWE has done in its time, and low and behold, they are still on the air.

I'm pretty sure that Lawler gave the go ahead for the segment anyway.

As someone who has lost someone to a heart attack, sure its a little insulting, but each person experiences it differently. Did it make me hate Punk and Heyman more, sure it did. Job done. I'm not going to sit here and say "that was horrible, I'll never watch again" because I will.

Done.
 
ok....how to phrase this right.....Jerry "the King " Lawler did not have a heart attack......the actor who portrays him did...Jerrod O'niel lawler....when we got the updates and the touts that he was ok......where was punk??? The moment you bling a big return on raw.....with nice cute lil sliding pyros you have to know they are advancing a storyline.....we had lawlers return weeks ago.....on tout, the photos when he arrived in memphis......tonight we had the return of the character of jerry the king lawler..... and at that point all bets are off....if its on raw...its meant to move a stroryline just like good ole JR appreciation night....
 
I'm in agreement with the people who say it was poorly executed. I'm sure Lawler approved it given his track record, so I wasn't extremely offended by it, but I wish Vince would just leave shit like this alone because he always executes it badly.
 
What a bunch of whining little piss pots.

This is pathetic, I mean it honestly and truly is. For years, one of the most common complaints I've heard on the internet is that WWE isn't edgy anymore. That people want something controversial to happen. That they want something more akin to Attitude Era style programming. Well people, you got it last night and, like clockwork, here you are complaining about it.

People seem to be fine with Stone Cold Steve Austin holding a gun to Vince's head while he pissed all over himself. They seem to be fine with Austin attacking Vince in a "hospital room" and sodomizing him with a piece of medical equipment. They seem to be fine with Vince "forcing" Trish Stratus to strip down to her underwear in front of a live television audience. What about Flair having a "heart attack" once upon a time? How about Andre having a "heart attack" during his feud with Jake Roberts & Boddy Heenan out there pounding on his chest?

Do you honestly believe that Vince McMahon would've gone through with this if Lawler hadn't been on board with it????? Do you think Mick Foley would've been involved with it if Lawler hadn't been fine with it? Mick Foley is about as decent of a person as you can get. He wouldn't have participated if Lawler hadn't been fully on board.

Last night's segment, in my view, was extremely well done and it poured massive heat onto CM Punk. Punk & Foley had another great round on the mic and Lawler is even more over now than he's probably been in the past 20 years. It made you want to see Punk get his ass kicked all the more. Jerry Lawler is a man that's been in pro wrestling for more than 40 years. He's seen it all, he's done it all and he's the definition of an old pro. That segment was money and it surprised the hell out of just about everyone watching. Now if Punk had gone out there and starting using racial slurs or making fun of the mentally handicapped, then I'd be offended. I see nothing to be offended about here. This isn't anything new as pro wrestling companies have done stuff like this for decades.

If you want something with a little bit of spice to it, a little bit of a kick, as far as programming format goes, then you got it last night. If your idea of edgy is for wrestlers to make asinine & juvenile jokes while swearing every other word, then it's just sad.
 
I'm actually very happy to see how upset everyone is. It means you bought everything that Punk wanted you to buy. Lawler and WWE gave Punk the okay, and he delivered a performance that ensured that he is not only the best heel in all of wrestling today, but also one of the very best of all time.

You all are witnesses of a heel that would be getting his tires slashed, and have batteries thrown at him when territories existed.

I assure you that nobody was prouder of CM Punk's performance than Jerry Lawler.

^^^^THIS^^^^

Punk, Lawler and Heyman did their job. Kayfabe is still alive.

Maybe this is the way to keep kayfabe going. Use the old school techniques so sparingly that fans don't realize when they're getting worked, and get upset.

Guaranteed that after the show, Punk, Lawler, Heyman and Vince all raised a glass of diet coke (diet pepsi for Punk) in the name of a job well done.

Time to go watch me some old Memphis wrestling on Youtube :)
 
I couldn't of said it better myself Jack Hammer.


With WWE 13 out I was actually motivated to go back and watch some of the story lines in the game again on the net. And you know what?? Those of you wanting programming to be like the attitude era again and yet complain about the Lawler segment are either the biggest hypocrits on the planet or nothing will ever satisfy you. (granted i complain about things too but not half as abd as some of these folks)
The promo did what it had to do, that is put more heat on CM Punk. Pure and simple. And from all the complaining here i reckon Vince needs a high 5 because all of you are reacting the way he wants you to react. And who will this be directed at not Vince..because at the moment he is a face., But CM Punk. The top heel in the company.

Well done Vince.

And Shame on the rest of you for being so pathetic that you complain about everything.
 
Is anyone really that upset or are you guys just outraged for the sake of being outraged?

That's the essence of political correctness, isn't it? Today, no one gets mad....no one gets angry.....today, we get "outraged" as if the world has been thrown off it's axis by things that don't actually amount to a hill of beans.

Jerry Lawler knew about Creative's plans and I would guess they wouldn't have proceeded with it if he had seriously objected. But he's a showman and the heart attack was, after all, something that happened on WWE programming; it's not as if it happened at Lawler's house during Christmas dinner with a camera crew coincidentally on hand.

When Lawler regained his senses after the heart attack, one of his first thoughts was probably that a program would be written around it. He's been doing this stuff all his life. If he can be a sport about it, so can we.

But take it easy guys. Even though WWE used Lawler's heart attack to it's advantage, the sun will still be coming up tomorrow morning.
 
DJS92491:

I was uncomfortable when David Arquette won the WCW heavyweight title in 2000. I was uncomfortable watching Jerry Lawler have a real life heart attack on TV 2 months ago. I was uncomfortable when Col. Robert Parker had a visible boner when he was doing a promo with Sensational Sherri and Harlem Heat on a WCW PPV once. I was uncomfortable when Owen Hart fell to his death back in 1999. I could go on and on here but a lot of you buttheads are missing the point on why some of us are upset or uncomfortable. It doesn't make us uncomfortable because Punk did a great job. It made us uncomfortable because it sucked. The segment does not ensure that Punk is one of the best heels of all time. If you've watched wrestling for more than 5 years, you'd know there's probably about 50 better previous heels in WWE history and probably another 50 around the world and in other promotions since the early 1900s. Lawler can be proud about Punk's performance all he wants. That's what detracts from the entertainment value of it. See, when the NWO came out and trashed the Four Horsemen THAT was tasteless but was one of the all time funniest and most entertaining segments ever. X Pac, playing Ric Flair, was MUCH FUNNIER heel shit than anything CM Punk has ever done in his entire career. And what makes the whole segment so epic to this day is that it pissed the shit out of Ric Flair and the 4 Horsemen. Flair and his boys were told by Bischoff that it would be pretty tame and Nash, Pac and Bagwell went out there and roasted the shit out of them.

Alright, I think I see where you're going now.

When everyone involved is working together, it's not as good as when everyone involved isn't working together... and one side is going into business for themselves?

The entertainment value for you is tied more to how real a segment is, as opposed to if it's worked?

That's fine. To each their own. But let me ask you. You obviously didn't know until after that the Horsemen weren't in on that NWO skit. Did it become more entertaining to you after finding out there was backstage controversy because of it... or did you enjoy it just as much on it's own?

The only problem I had with the entire segment last night is that Foley used it to kick off the replacement vote angle for the night. Why make such a big deal about the replacement guy, then later tell the Miz that he doubted he'd win it... when the thing was so geared towards a Miz win that the voting angle was pointless? At least give him some slightly stiffer competition than the two comedy jobbers on the roster.
 
I found it to be a little below the belt to make fun of Lawler's near death experience, although I fully understand why WWE did it the way they did. The man almost died.... However, due to the legend status that he has and what he went through, I would like to think that WWE would have asked him ahead of time if he was ok with CM Punk using the situation to generate some more heat for himself. After what he had just gone through I doubt WWE would torture him by having the whole experience be mocked onscreen. Punk and Heyman made the fans angry last night. Congratulations, they did their jobs. You're not supposed to like heels, remember?

Could it have been scaled back a little? Perhaps. I personally think it was below the belt. It's not the end of the world though. Lawler is back doing what he loves, the fans who missed him are happy to see him return, and Punk got himself more over as a heel by disrespecting another legend. Seems like this promo did what it was meant to do. The next time you get upset at what a heel does, keep it in mind that you aren't supposed to like him anyhow. As for Vince, Trips, or whoever came up with the idea for this promo, they would not run it onscreen without speaking to Lawler about it first asking for his approval. Not mentioning it to him in advance would be extremely unprofessional.
 
The NWO making fun of the Horsemen for about 15 minutes non stop was funny shit because of how serious the Horsemen considered themselves. A week prior they were out eating up about half an hour of airtime just to be honored. Flair, Anderson, Benoit, Malenko, Mongo and whoever were pretty notorious for either being a bit too serious or high on themselves. And the NWO promo was full of inside jabs at the group, it's leader and their legacy. Jabs that were personal that made sense. I remember thinking at the time watching it live that nobody even Bischoff consented to what was being said. Some time after that, maybe a few weeks or months, I figured that the Horsemen must have been ok with it because the angle was so great. Then, I believe after reading Flair's book years later, it turned out I was right in the beginning. I guess my whole thing is that it was a logical direction for the angle between the two super groups. It built heat and was entertaining. Nobody had to fake a heart attack or get racist or give birth to a hand. I remember watching Flair fake a heart attack after getting extremely too riled up at Bischoff a year later and it made sense. I loved it. There was a year worth of hatred between the two from the NWO/Horsemen feud. Every week there was crazy shit happening on Raw and Nitro and very few people believed it was a real heart attack. Flair had riled him up so much throughout his career and at the time his promos were getting more and more hardcore. Flair was aging. I remember maybe a month before one of my friends saying Flair was getting so crazy and old that he was eventually gonna give himself a heart attack. So faking one in the ring made sense as part of an angle. It's not like he or anyone else he was feuding with had just had a heart attack weeks before. If they had, I'm sure WCW in 1997 under the war-like circumstances with WWE could have found a way to make it more entertaining than just plain tasteless. But in PG WWE in 2012? The way Vince wants it done rather than the personalities pulling off the angle. Lame.

The thing that bothers people is that Jerry Lawler could have easily lost his life on TV 9 weeks ago. We all watched and worried we'd get the announcement before Raw ended that Lawler had passed. It was a traumatizing moment for some people, especially kids. So perhaps for those people with the mentality of children or who've had direct experience losing a loved one to a heart attack, this angle gained Punk heat. But for most of us, in this day and age, I think the heats directed at whoever scripted it (Vince/Hunter/Stephanie). So that's why the segment was executed badly, a lot of the heat is getting put on the script writer and not the personality. Go back to 1997 when the NWO roasted the Horsemen. What was said was off the cuff. No one scripted that and read it from a teleprompter. No one knew for sure beforehand what was going to be said and the personalities were given the green light to do whatever without being restrained or having it watered down. Anyway, as much as I love Heyman and Punk, I feel the whole promo didn't come off right because it wasn't the way those involved would do it their own way without the PG restrictions.

Mrmojorasin: I have no problem with what you're saying but I don't think it's about going into business for yourself. Lawler and Kaufman went into business for themselves and I'm sure it was good business. The NWO weren't into business for themselves when they chewed out the Horsemen. It was stuff that came across real, which was somewhat real, that was logical and good for overall business whether Ric Flair and Arn Anderson found it tasteless or not. Segments with Kaufman and Lawler and the NWO mocking the Horsemen were executed the way that shits suppose to be executed. Mocking Lawler's death just wasn't. Had Punk and Heyman did what they did without Vince's knowledge and without the PG rating and Lawler was either insulted or noticeably surprised..and more of us were insulted, then that would be executed well and I'd be on here making fun of those of you who'd hate that. Anyway, the fact that most of you here loved last night is proof that Punk didn't do a good enough job gaining legit heat. End of story.
 
I thought it was horrible. All I could think about was my Father-in-Law died of a heart attack-alone. I changed the channel until Punk was done.
 
And here is why McMahon is a genius. I agree that the footage of the actual heart attack was a little reprehensible but here we are. All of us watched it and are seven pages deep talking about it. Objective completed.
 
i couldn't agree more with HiddenInPlainView. WWE and/or Vince wanted to generate a buzz among fans and we've got it. While their methods may be considered cheap, it was what the promo wanted. Outrage from most fans.
 
All the folks talking about how they are upset about this because it reminded them of loved ones having heart attacks better never watch a movie again. Just in case.

ANYWAY!

About 30 years ago Jerry Lawler had a great feud with a gentleman named Andy Kaufman and I believe Jerry learned something(if he didn't know it from being a wrestler already)from Andy and it was, "Everything is fair game."

This happened. Jerry had a heart attack. It happened on live television and then he recovered. WHY WOULD YOU PASS THIS UP? If I were in Vince McMahon's shoes I would be approving the same thing. Sometimes what's "tasteless" and "crass" to one is appropriate entertainment to another. One man's blasphemy is another man's satire. I know that statement can be taken to HUGE extremes, but if you understand the context then I would hope those reading this would be able to be objective.

Also, it is painfully obvious that Lawler is a-okay with this, even if you aren't. So congratulations to CM Punk, Paul Heyman, Vince McMahon and Jerry "The King" Lawler for proving once again that you can't take the internet away from the mark, but you sure can remind them of what they are!

Oh and one more thing, to get back to that first bit about the sad faces upset about the heart attack hitting too close to home, my dad died of cancer two years ago and if McMahon ran an angle where he had six months to live and grew a tumor on the side of his neck and went bald from radiation, I think I would be okay with that. Grow up, kiddies. It's professional wrestling.
 
I wasn't particularly offended by the angle. I understand how and why it happened. In fact, it was quite predictable.

I just found it to be lame as hell. it was all done to generate some cheap heat for Punk, and that's lame and not showing confidence in Punk's ability to generate heat. It's really kind of dredging the bottom of the barrel. It's just as lame as Katie Vick and other assorted lame angles through the years.
 
The thing that bothers people is that Jerry Lawler could have easily lost his life on TV 9 weeks ago.

But he didn't die. He lived and we have to move past the gaping stage of fear and discomfort that we had with the situation.

We all watched and worried we'd get the announcement before Raw ended that Lawler had passed. It was a traumatizing moment for some people, especially kids. So perhaps for those people with the mentality of children or who've had direct experience losing a loved one to a heart attack, this angle gained Punk heat.

Your traumatizing me with you dramatics. There's no such thing as legit heat anymore. Pretty much everyone knows that the show is scripted. Either you accept it and play along or you bail on the product. Punk and Heyman are clearly defined bad characters who do things that people shouldn't do.

If you want to bitch about something, bitch about AJ making fun of Vicky's weight. AJ is supposed to be the face but she acted in a way that kids really reflect on and hurt each other. Plus Vicky isn't a good example of a fat person.


But for most of us, in this day and age, I think the heats directed at whoever scripted it (Vince/Hunter/Stephanie).

Yes, people are at home booing the executives.

Anyway, as much as I love Heyman and Punk, I feel the whole promo didn't come off right because it wasn't the way those involved would do it their own way without the PG restrictions.

Are you just another person that can't except that Punk and Heyman are heels and are not there to do what you want them to do? That would explain the souring outrage. If you love them just be happy that get a significant spot in the biggest angle of the night. Stop trying to justify your dissatisfaction with some NWO story. Punk is a heel, heels are bad people, you should accept it and boo along with the children.

rmojorasin: I have no problem with what you're saying but I don't think it's about going into business for yourself. Lawler and Kaufman went into business for themselves and I'm sure it was good business. The NWO weren't into business for themselves when they chewed out the Horsemen. It was stuff that came across real, which was somewhat real, that was logical and good for overall business whether Ric Flair and Arn Anderson found it tasteless or not. Segments with Kaufman and Lawler and the NWO mocking the Horsemen were executed the way that shits suppose to be executed. Mocking Lawler's death just wasn't. Had Punk and Heyman did what they did without Vince's knowledge and without the PG rating and Lawler was either insulted or noticeably surprised..and more of us were insulted, then that would be executed well and I'd be on here making fun of those of you who'd hate that. Anyway, the fact that most of you here loved last night is proof that Punk didn't do a good enough job gaining legit heat. End of story.

People loved it because they understand it is part of the show and they accept that Punk and Heyman's characters would sink so low. They aren't caught up in what is scripted and not scripted and what the NWO may have done 15 years ago. They just watched the show for what it is, a show. Get off your soap box of longwindedness of justifications and relax.
 
wrestling or not. fake or not. that entire segment was not funny. punk trash talking lawler is one thing but heyman faking the heart attack was not funny. that was very distasteful. idc if jerry was ok with it or not. the whole video montage of him collapsing and receiving medical attention was disgusting.
 
I think that what we can take out of this, is that the world has changed since the 90s. Like one of the other posters said it's all about politically correct. I mean you had you had a guy (who wasn't even arab) portray an arab muslim extremist character and he got pulled not because muslims where upset but because tv execs got cold feet. My family is of arab descent and I wanted him to get his butt kicked.
I shook my head at the screen for the Lawler segment sure but I certainly didn't think it was lame. How is this any different to Orton say Eddie is in hell? Or Punk singing happy birthday to Rey's kid? Or Eddie saying he is Rey's kids dad? Or Lawler/Cena/AJ making fun of Vickies weight?
My grandad died of a heart attack and I wasn't offended by this.
Grow up people
 
George Steele's barber: How am I traumatizing you by stating again that Jerry Lawler almost died? There is nothing over dramatic about re stating the facts of what happened. I know Lawler could care less now if its part of an angle or not but the fact is the man legitimately almost died on TV. He didn't, that's good, and they ran an angle mocking his death and...well a lot of us think it sucked. It wasn't heelish enough. It wasn't even cheap heat it was just dumb and inproper. Could have been saved for a better time. Anyway, barber, the way you speak of Lawler you sound about as cold and robotic as the wrestling personalities/robots we have these days executing Vince's orders the best they can. I get that it's weeks later and Lawler is in the clear and the whole thing can be mocked on TV for entertainment value and to make Punk more of a heel. If it works. But it didn't. It wasn't executed well. Way too many of you liked it.

Anyway, man, read my previous comments before putting words in my mouth. Punk and Heyman did a good job playing heels, for you, because it takes very little to entertain you. But for a lot of us, it left us feeling nothing. Plain and simple. It wasn't that it was tasteless because it made us want to cry. I was tasteless because it was unnecessary and left us feeling uneasy because it was awkward. Uneasy like Owen almost paralyzing Austin uneasy.
 
Everyone defending the direction of the writing last night is missing the main point: People are entitled to their opinions. If someone finds it offensive, its their right to feel such a way. They aren't "wrong" for their opinion. I found it to be a tasteless segment as well. I am not wrong for thinking that just like you are not wrong for thinking otherwise.

It just seems to me that there's heat that you try to get from your performers and there's "redirected heat" that you DON'T want to accumulate. That's the kind of heat that gets directed to the people responsible for writing and giving the OK to tasteless storylines, segments, promos etc. The type of controversial heat that a performer gets varies obviously on the person, the subject, and the timing of it incident. Yesterday I believe the portion of the WWE Universe *cringes* that was quiet or groaning, were the showing signs of "redirected heat". Just like the people here who are complaining about it don't seem to care if Lawler gave the OK to do the segment. It doesn't matter to us if he is alright with his brush with death being used in a storyline. We feel at least a little disappointed that they chose to yet again use cheap, tasteless, shots at a man who almost died in order to garner heat for one of their performers. We feel its very inappropriate and were upset at whomever had the final say in going this route (Vince McMahon).
 
There is no chance in hell that this segment went ahead without King giving it the ok. King doesn't need the WWE and he has proved it before when he walked away and they had to ask him to come back. If he wasn't in on this he would just up and leave and then the WWE would have some bad press.

The reason that they showed King receiving medical care in the back was to play your heart strings they wanted you to relive what happened and see how traumatising a heart attack is to witness first hand. It wasn't pleasant or pretty and it wasn't meant to be, it was done to drive home how serious the issue was. This was done to make Punk's interference seem even more disrespectful and to garner more heat.

People are flip flopping so bad on why they didn't like it. First of all it was tasteless and crass and served no purpose, then it was because it wasn't entertaining enough. Now it's because it wasn't real enough. You know how to get realism out of it? Not tell Jerry they were going to do it, but that would be horribly tasteless and was never going to be the case.

Now people are saying that because we know the show is scripted that's why it wasn't entertaining. Do you know why we know the show is scripted because people told us. We are all on a message board that we can read spoilers on and discuss what has happened. We the fans ruined the realism of the product.
Saying that it wasn't good because some people liked how it garnered heat for Punk is a terrible argument, the people on this message boards talk about the angles that are good and bad and discuss how they could be better. To distinguish if an angle caused people to hate the heel more you can not use this forum or any other wrestling forum to judge it because the people on here are critics and know that it's all a work. You have to look to the reactions of the casual fans to see if the angle did it's job, and by the sound of the boo's Punk was getting it did.

The angle was meant to show Punk and Heyman in a bad light and make them seem like dirty underhanded characters who only care about themselves and make fun of everyone else. That's what it did.
Jerry was ok with this angle and we have seen worse from the WWE and people loved it, this is a case of people moaning when they don't get what they want (the attitude era) and then moaning when they get it (or at least something equal to it)
 
I changed the channel until Punk was done.

I think this is the crux of the matter. How many people did this? Did it gain more viewers than lose them? Probably not. I don't change the channel for much but as soon as Heyman started feigning the heart attack, I changed the channel and came back for the next segment. I won't say that I "won't watch again" like many others have because that's an impossible promise to prove on something like this. However, it is just one of a list of things that have been pushing me away.

That's just my opinion. Many of the opposite opinion have stated we "need to grow a set," but I don't feel like this is an accurate description of those of us that disliked this segment.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top