Is it time to put the WWE Championship on The Big Show?

[OIL]

Well I don't know about that. He's never been consistently an unstoppable giant. But he has in patches. Yet the only time I think he's really ever done anything with it is when he was ECW champ, and when he was facing Mayweather. If with Khali losing frequently now, his first 18 months as a monster heel were better than anything Big Show did. But I put that down to bad WWE booking & Big Show being lazy.

Him being lazy is why I don't think anybody has ever accepted him as a serious world champion.

Probably right, but my point is he SHOULD be an unstoppable giant. Ok not unstopabble, but damn near that. For his size and strength, it should be the main focus about him.

Yep, bad booking has made the Big Show look a lot worse than he could have been, losing to people like Mayweather. For what Floyd was getting paid he should have put over Big Show, it would have been a bigger win for Show than it was for Floyd. You don't see people outside of wrestling talking about it, and if Show had won it would have caused more headlines IMO.

 

[AMERICANFIRE]

Show Would Be A Good Feud With Hhh Right Now. First Jeff Is Being Pushed To Tittle Shots To Much To Early. Show Can Really Wrestle Unlike Khali And Can Carry A Show. Him Being Alighned With Vickie Could Be A Good Thing. We Could Have Another Edge And Vckie Storyline On Our Hands. Ths Could Help Push Show To The Top Where He Needs To Be. Wwe Is Doing A Good Thing Here I Just Hope They Dont Make Show Job To Taker That Would Make Show Look Like Crape And Not Believable

 

[matty256]

I think the Show should be champ. Its different, and hes a decent wrestler.How do you know people won't buy him as champ? You'd rather have spanky? How believable is that? With the Big Show as champ, it would be hard to predict who would beat him with his size. A heel Show with motivation is good, because his opponent would always be the underdog and that would put that wrestler more over. If you give Khali a title reign, you better give show one. And I'm sorry, but if you didn't see that punch coming, then you need to pay attention, bacause there was no reason for the show to still be there, and vicki would not go against Taker alone. And Big Show did win a Royal Rumble, he was a co-winner with the Rock in 2000, setting up that 4 way at wrestlemania.

show didnt co win the rumble with the rock. the rock won it but show challenged the rock at no way out for the spot of the main event and won cus shane mcmahon hit the rock with a chair and this setup the 4way between rock foley trips and show at mania and they each had a mcmahon in thier corner.
but anyway i think show does deserve a decent title run maybe a win against trips at survivor series and he can at least hold it until no way out where he'll lose it to jeff hardy and itll setup a great match for hardy and edge at mania

 

[The Mark of Zur-En-Arrh]

Show could work well as champ, for some reason his first 2 WWE title runs were stupidly short, but then look who he dropped it to. HHH and Angle. HHH was the biggest heel at the time and they obviously wanted to make him look like he was untouchable with both Austin and Taker out of the picture. He'd beaten Foley, he'd beaten Rock, he'd beaten Kane who were the other credible challengers at the time, Show was the only guy left to beat, and he did it. I guess they wanted Lesnar/Angle rather than Show/anybody at WM but he could of had it longer, but then we'd never have ahd the Benoit/Angle classic at RR, or any of the matches between so...

In his ECW reign the guy was unstoppable. No one even came close to making him look like he could be beat. He must have beaten ALL the main eventers from Raw and Smackdown in extreme rules matches, sometimes 2 guys at once, as well as squashing the ECW contenders. The only way he was going to lose the belt was in a multi man match like the EC match. They could do the same thing again, and have him lose in a triple threat or something. Before he's been hyped as being the most dominant champ ever when he's heel, but then never wins it to prove that theory. I don't think his title run could last more than 5 or 6 months without people hating it. As long as it takes place after Mania or at least ends before the Rumble, i think Show could have a great run with the title. Could still happen. People say he's done nothing since comig back at NWO, well people said Jericho's comeback was a flop til he got in this fued with HBK and now he's THE man on Raw. I think Show has the potential to do the same thing for Smackdown. I doubt he and Taker could pull off the same thing as HBK/Y2J because theirs is an emotional fued, and you can't do emotional fueds with a face Taker, but i still think Show could pull it off.

But then it's not up to me is it?

 

[Mattyboy]

I think Show v Taker is just giving Taker something to do until he wins the title again-WWE have been planning for an extended [and thoroughly deserved] run with Taker as champ, but Takers injuries messed it up. I can see Edge returning during Taker v Show, so potentially this feud could be really cool.

Id like to see the strap on someone new to keep things fresh, big HHH fan though. If HHH doesnt drop the belt to Hardy or MVP etc, i can only hope for HHH v Taker-thats bigger than Y2J v HBK