salomon1080s
Occasional Pre-Show
I've noticed a trend lately WWE is hiring a lot of their former legends kids. Also there has been talk on this forum of wanting the WWE to hire more 2nd and 3rd gen stars. So my question is it a good thing for the WWE to hire stars with a legacy or someone like CM punk who is a first gen, also is it better for the wrestler to have a legacy?
personally, I could go either way on this for the creative team it's easier for them because they can just slap the 2nd gen. star with a similar gimimick as there father. Also they can use there father to help get there kids over like how cowboy bob did for randy orton. For a first gen they don't have these advantages they would have to be creative with him but you could have your hands on the next hulk hogan.
For the wrestler i think it's bad. They're is a good chance that they won't be as good as their fathers and will that will tarnish their entire careers.
personally, I could go either way on this for the creative team it's easier for them because they can just slap the 2nd gen. star with a similar gimimick as there father. Also they can use there father to help get there kids over like how cowboy bob did for randy orton. For a first gen they don't have these advantages they would have to be creative with him but you could have your hands on the next hulk hogan.
For the wrestler i think it's bad. They're is a good chance that they won't be as good as their fathers and will that will tarnish their entire careers.