... and yes Jenks, if they're going to be serious, they need more program time. Personally, I'd like to see a secondary (non-catchup) show.
Awesome, positive post, man.
Hmm, the secondary shows worry me. I would try adding an hour or even a half an hour to the show as it is, first. It's not like Spike has anything better on anyway.
One show that I couldn't stand was WCW Thunder, that show SUCKED! And with TNA, they tape in the Impact Zone and supposedly will be going on the road every other week, so I think 8 tapings a month or taping two shows for one week in one day would be extremely hectic.
I mean, I guess it could work, but would the second show be worth it. I know TNA use to be an hour long - Adrenaline Rush. I suppose TNA could put on an hour long show and make it better then Superstars and try and highlight their lesser known, better wrestlers, but I'm not sure what the pay off would be. Also I wouldn't want to split the roster like Smackdown/RAW and would worry about dividing the draws between shows. Could it work though? Possibly.
There's a lot of questions to be asked when thinking about two shows, like how the storylines will work out and how often certain guys will wrestle.
I think no matter what, TNA needs at least a 2 1/2-3 hour show right now. If you take the current show as it is and you add two matches(half an hour) with the guys who aren't being used as much, I think it would only increase the value of the show.
If TNA isn't going to add time/another show anytime soon, then they need to cut back on the KO's division. Who is it at TNA that thinks people care about women's wrestling? All we want to do is look at them! Bra and panties matches please!!!
Anyway, I think adding more time to Impact or another show is definitely being discussed. I don't think Impact was as set up for a three hour show/another show a year ago, as it now is.