To the OP, I am indifferent on Hogan ever wrestling again but like I have said in other threads if it happens it happens. Doesn't mean I support it or like it but I accept the inevitability that he'll have another "fight" sometime down the road.
Mike "The Kid" Killam;3504196 said:
It's not going to happen. WWE let Bret Hart have his one last match with Vince because that NEEDED to happen for everyone involved. Hogan doesn't need another match, he needs to be put down.
Um, Bret vs Vince did not need to happen Mike, point blank it didn't...yes it was good for closure in a storyline but considering the style of wrestler that Bret Hart has always been, I definitely was not a fan of the WrestleMania 26 showdown no more than I was a fan of Sting's match with Hogan at Bound For Glory, again though I accepted the fact that it happened.
But the "need" for Bret vs Vince was nil...like I said before Vince got his ass whipped in the storylines backstage at Survivor Series 1997 after he "screwed" Bret. For me and other fans of that era, I am sure that was good enough. Bret got his physical retaliation the night he got screwed, nuff said.
Because let's not forget Bret still had a couple of more "matches" if you even want to call them that after his WrestleMania match with Vince. One of them included him winning a title (The U.S. Championship from The Miz) and even being part of a pay per view main event as a "participant" (SummerSlam 2010).
So with your pretzel logic on this matter of men past 50 wrestling...if Hogan should be "put down" Old Yeller style...let's throw guys like Bret Hart and Ric Flair in there too. Those guys have been greater offenders of this rule than Hogan's ever been.
Last time Hogan won a championship was in 2002 (the tag titles with Edge) before he even reached the age of 49 and the last time he actually closed out a PPV show was in 2005 against Shawn Michaels at SummerSlam that year. And guess what? Those both happened in WWE, a place where he supposedly did not have that "political tyrant power" like he had in Dubbya See Dubbya.
Since being in what people like to call WCW 2.0 (TNA), Hogan has wrestled in only two matches, that tag match with Abyss vs Flair and AJ Styles (which Hogan gave all the glory to Abyss in anyway) and that "fight" with Sting...and let's be honest those matches didn't harm anyone.
In a place where Hogan supposedly calls all the shots I find it so amusing that people will speak so negatively about his presence in TNA where it's been his later runs in WWE where he's actually had more storyline glory when you really think about it. Again I cite his World Title and Tag Team Title runs in 2002 (albeit they were brief but these days that's par for the course) and the fact that he main evented SummerSlam 2005 against HBK (hell Sting and Hogan did not close out BFG at least). As far as his authority figure role goes, let's be honest his year long run as a heel was no different than Vince McMahon's evil boss persona. Yes, I think I could have done without Hogan's Immortal group but again a harmless angle that used Hogan in a non-wrestling role.
Anyway, bottom line Hogan will more likely than not wrestle again in some way shape or form, but as the record these past couple years has shown, Hogan's times in the ring will more than likely be few and far in between. I don't see him trying to win the TNA Title (I mean I could be wrong but I think by now he'd have tried it and I think he definitely would have tried it before his back surgeries had to happen) and as far as a WWE return to wrestle another match goes, yeah it could happen but who knows, time will tell, like I say about everything else.
But let's consider this for a second Hogan's participation in a wrestling ring with WWE would be no worse than the bullcrap I've seen from the company in the past few years...i.e. Chavo Guerrero jobbing out to Cedric The Entertainer, Snookie pinning Michelle McCool, Vickie Guerrero having a war of words with Miss Piggy and so on.
So Mike saying that Hogan should be "put down" because he gets involved in a wrestling match just once a year these days is questionable especially if you are going to justify Bret Vs Vince...
Again, even though I didn't like the Bret Vs Vince idea, I know it happened and I accepted it but if you are going to justify that occurring...it sounds like a double standard to me if you're going to be so quick to judge Hogan's continuing to wrestle.