AnthonyMango/NoFate007
A Post Is Worth A Thousand Words
For the record, I highly dislike the many, many, many instances in where its obvious that HHH IS getting special treatment.
But as others said, there is the possibility that this is simply because he's the WWE champion. Still, though, you'd kind of wonder why they wouldn't apply the same rule for Chris Jericho, right? Nobody brought that up in trying to use this excuse. He's supposed to be on par with HHH.
The only way we'll be able to tell if this is the case is if next year's game, we have a different WWE champion and they have the same rule. If Smackdown vs Raw 2010 says "you can't show (insert champ other than HHH) in a defeated position", then we'll know it was just because he had the title. But if we don't see it, then we can assume that its HHH getting special treatment.
Levelheadedness, guys. Not everything is a conspiracy, but that certainly doesn't mean that NOTHING is.
But as others said, there is the possibility that this is simply because he's the WWE champion. Still, though, you'd kind of wonder why they wouldn't apply the same rule for Chris Jericho, right? Nobody brought that up in trying to use this excuse. He's supposed to be on par with HHH.
The only way we'll be able to tell if this is the case is if next year's game, we have a different WWE champion and they have the same rule. If Smackdown vs Raw 2010 says "you can't show (insert champ other than HHH) in a defeated position", then we'll know it was just because he had the title. But if we don't see it, then we can assume that its HHH getting special treatment.
Levelheadedness, guys. Not everything is a conspiracy, but that certainly doesn't mean that NOTHING is.