Greatest WZ Troll Ever Mini-Tournament...It's Coming Soon

[ScreaminNormanSmiley]

If Norm wants in I'll put him in. That being said, there's one marked difference between him and the people I've already included: he doesn't start threads for the sole purpose of shit stirring.

If that is the credential necessary to be entered you simply must put milenko in this tournament.

 

[ScreaminNormanSmiley]

It is, I guess the term trolling has changed over my time on a forum/message board.

I was talking about you.

Edit: And I suppose JGlass as well

 

[Final Form Snyper.]

I was talking about you.

Edit: And I suppose JGlass as well

?

I was saying you were more of a straight shooter than a troll.

 

[Ultra Awesome]

Um.. A 'straight shooter' CAN be a troll, you know. A troll's job is to annoy (get a reaction from) said poster using whatever method he sees fit. It brings him amusement and pleasure. Being honest and pointing out the flaws in a post or a poster -- as SNS tends to do -- is, uh, one of those ways.

 

[Final Form Snyper.]

Um.. A 'straight shooter' CAN be a troll, you know.

In saying that being a straight shooter can be a troll of course they can. So can Bill Gates if he wanted to.

I'm saying that telling the truth is different to trolling for responses. If the truth hurts, that is your problem shouldn't be anyone else's.

A troll's job is to annoy (get a reaction from) said poster using whatever method he sees fit.

And a straight shooters job is the tell the truth.

It brings him amusement and pleasure.

Should ask him before you say this.

Being honest and pointing out the flaws in a post or a poster -- as SNS tends to do -- is, uh, one of those ways.

It is called constructive criticism. Learn from your mistakes and become a better poster.

 

[LSN80]

I'm saying that telling the truth is different then trolling for responses. If the truth hurts, that is your problem shouldn't be anyone else's.

This is a huge line of B.S. I generally agree with what you have to say, but someone who, without filter, spews truth 100% of the time without regard for anyone else, hurtful or not, has a very big problem that doesn't just involve the person being spoken to. And these two aren't always mutually exclusive. Someone can tell the truth and still be trolling for responses.

And a straight shooters job is the tell the truth.

I think this goes without saying.

It is called constructive criticism. Learn from your mistakes and become a better poster.

Now whose assuming? He's a darn fine poster both in the NWS and Wrestling sections. Tacking on a personal shot at someone at the end doesn't strengthen your argument here.

 

[Big Nick Dudley]

It is called constructive criticism. Learn from your mistakes and become a better poster.

Who is giving constructive criticism?

 

[Hyorinmaru]

If that is the credential necessary to be entered you simply must put milenko in this tournament.

He's got a point here

 

[Sully]

You can't put Macca in there. The title is "Greatest WZ Troll Ever", Macca is not the one of the greatest, in fact..he's a wanna be troll. You can constantly tell he tries too hard.

 

[Via Armbar]

Macca definitely tries really hard. The few actual credible, successful trolls here can be counted on one hand. Granted you have all five fingers that are to be expected on said hand.

 

[Big Nick Dudley]

Also, Macca isn't funny, he's just..mean.

 

[Nate DaMac]

http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showthread.php?t=157284


A decent troll thread I believe.

 

[Sully]

Wait...has Jackie been mentioned?

 

[.]

Jackie's not a troll, he's just a dumbass.

 

[Sully]

Sound of Madness

 

[Lee]

SOM's learned from the best!

 

[Pepe Silvia]

Arrrgh

The best trolls aren't blatant; in fact, you probably won't know they were trolling you from anywhere between 30 minutes to a day depending on their trolltasticness. while trolling may include flaming, they're not the same fucking thing.

 

[Sully]

GD and Coco have to be in it.

 

[Final Form Snyper.]

This is a huge line of B.S. I generally agree with what you have to say, but someone who, without filter, spews truth 100% of the time without regard for anyone else, hurtful or not, has a very big problem that doesn't just involve the person being spoken to. And these two aren't always mutually exclusive. Someone can tell the truth and still be trolling for responses.

But what if they aren't using the "truth" as taking a shot at someone. What if they legitimately mean what they say without trying to show malice?

Does that make them a troll if they don't know they are doing it?

Now whose assuming? He's a darn fine poster both in the NWS and Wrestling sections. Tacking on a personal shot at someone at the end doesn't strengthen your argument here.

I was using an example I didn't mean anything by it just as an example. I know he is showing alot more posting than me here....... I wouldn't give him advice because I don't follow it myself.

Who is giving constructive criticism?

Certainly isn't me.

 

[Cena's Little Helper]

I'm starting this tonight. I'll be back on in about two hours. I'll need some people to help me out (you'll be finding old threads). Who's with me?

 

[Joe's Gonna Kill You]

I'll Help out tdigs.

 

[TSG]

I would like to nominate Jenks. And Bill Lesnar could count also. BELIEVE THE HYPE!

 

[Joe's Gonna Kill You]

So tdigs what do you need help with?

 

[Cena's Little Helper]

I'll need help finding threads in which the participants were at their worst. When I work up the final list, I'll tell you which ones to research/look up threads for.

 

[ROCKY VS CENA OMG]

I nominate Shattered Dreams. No one can be that ******ed.