You are right about Raw. That show isn't nearly as good as it shoudl be. But Smackdown is head and shoulders above Raw in terms or pure Wrestling. Storylines, while still somewhat interesting, takes a backseat to the actual wrestling, which is how it should be. ECW isn't that far behind, considering it is only an hour long. Lashley isn't all that bland really. Keep him quiet, with the fire he has in the ring, and you have yourself one badass monster. You don't have to have mic skills in every circumstance. Hell, do you hear his pops when he comes out? Pretty impressive considering. CM Punk isn't wrestling to notch guys for a reason. How stupid would it be to bring him in, and have him go against RVD or Sabu right from the get go? No, you build him up. Start him from the beginning. Hell, I still think him being in the chamber is a bit too soon. Paul Heyman have plenty of control over ECW. He's the head booker for it. Big Show has been a good ECW champion, and anyone can see that if they didn't have bias. He's worked his ass off for ECW. Blame RVD, one of your origonals for him getting th ebelt in the first place. His body is breaking down the point that he's in pain everyday, and contemplating retirement, and he still goes out there. Is that not enough? Not to mention some of the good hardcore matches he's had as Champion. He's doing his job well. Who are they pushing that is less then Talented? CM Punk, Big Show, RVD, Lashley, Sabu, Hardcore Holly, and Test are who they are pushing big. The only one who you can really make a case for as being less then stellar is Test. Sure, some segments are going to bomb on the show, as "extreme strip poker" did, but not EVERY segment is gonna be good all the time. If you could look at ECW without the biasness of the old ECW, you would see it for what it is. A Seperate brand that has nothing to do with the old ECW, that offers good entertainment.