FromtheThread | Page 72 | WrestleZone Forums

FromtheThread

I love it when people say "I am so patriotic I want to waste everyone's time with frivolous lawsuits against Obama's state of origin!"

Yeah, because I'm sure the Republicans wouldn't have stepped up and said "No" if they had any chance of keeping Obama from being approved for the Presidential race.
 
One quick question. I just took a Trapzodone, and I'm about to be knocked out. Hopefully FTS can answer it. It has Second Amendment written all over it.

Okay. So the Second Amendment allows for gun possession in order to keep a standing militia for the sake of the defense of the state, correct? It was mainly to keep a repeat of King George passing an Act (Stamp Act, I think) that forced the Colonists to allow British Troops to be garrisoned in their homes. It's the same reason why Church and State are so eagerly separated in our founding documents. We didn't want another Church of England, with our President at the head.

Don't the states have that in the form of the (Insert State Here) National Guard?

So, say if some Tea Partiers in....oh, I don't know, Oklahoma, were trying to legally start a militia there to protect the state from the "steamrolling of state's rights," (AP Don't Know What to Think) would the militia not be redundant?

Hell, can a state even form a militia that has the express purpose of "limiting federal power?" That sounds mighty like they're trying to threaten secession. Especially by having a separate militia that answers to no one but the (I'm assuming) governor?

Fuck it. Forget my Constitutional argument. How would a state use an independent militia to block federal laws? Would they stand at all interstates that enter and leave the state and block any traffic from out of state? I mean, that's an excepted forum for the Federal Government to regulate, and rightfully so. I don't know, I'm just trying to understand these ideas that people keep spouting out.
 
Ok, so story.

Im the mall sunday, sweatpants, sandals, tank top. two day scraggly beard.

Well, I walk past this girl that was SO stunningly pretty, that I kinda stared, and she caught me. Well, I just kept walking becuase she didnt look like the type of girl who would give me a second look in a million years. I mean she looked like this total preppy princess, very very well dressed, make up perfect, conservatively dressed, etc etc. I figured if anything, I would have frightened her, lulz.

SHE approaches ME and says "you can stare, but you don't say hi? what's up with that?"

I was like "uuuuuhhh...look at you, and look at me"

Her "What are you talking about, your gorgeous!!"

Me "Oh I know, I just meant like, you dont seem like you would have wanted to talk to someone in sweats and a beater with tons of tattoos and all that"

Her "Oh no no, your totally my type, and I would never judge someone without talking to them!!! Here is my number, call me later!"

I texted her later, which then prompted HER to call ME :lmao: Ended up on the phone for two hours. She informed me she has tattoos on her tit and on her ass, she had to do them there becuase she does state beauty pagents.

Ridiculous.

from the NorCal thread. thought you would like this
 
One quick question. I just took a Trapzodone, and I'm about to be knocked out. Hopefully FTS can answer it. It has Second Amendment written all over it.

Okay. So the Second Amendment allows for gun possession in order to keep a standing militia for the sake of the defense of the state, correct? It was mainly to keep a repeat of King George passing an Act (Stamp Act, I think) that forced the Colonists to allow British Troops to be garrisoned in their homes. It's the same reason why Church and State are so eagerly separated in our founding documents. We didn't want another Church of England, with our President at the head.

Don't the states have that in the form of the (Insert State Here) National Guard?

So, say if some Tea Partiers in....oh, I don't know, Oklahoma, were trying to legally start a militia there to protect the state from the "steamrolling of state's rights," (AP Don't Know What to Think) would the militia not be redundant?

Hell, can a state even form a militia that has the express purpose of "limiting federal power?" That sounds mighty like they're trying to threaten secession. Especially by having a separate militia that answers to no one but the (I'm assuming) governor?

Fuck it. Forget my Constitutional argument. How would a state use an independent militia to block federal laws? Would they stand at all interstates that enter and leave the state and block any traffic from out of state? I mean, that's an excepted forum for the Federal Government to regulate, and rightfully so. I don't know, I'm just trying to understand these ideas that people keep spouting out.

I didn't really read this because I am imagining it is some pro-leftist pro-big government, anti-gun rant.

If you take the guns away from the people, no militia could form in times of need. I am not going to join a militia as things stand, but if they keep moving the way they are, then I may want to. If you take the guns away, that option won't be open to me.

Furthermore, something about cold dead hands is coming to my mind.
 
Nice.

You can keep the girls with that tats. I find that unattractive.

me too, generally. I threw it in there to futher highlight that this girl likely has a whole lot more going on than I first anticipated. The fact she was up on me, and made that revelation makes me think she can handle her buisness much better than most preppy princesses.
 
I didn't really read this because I am imagining it is some pro-leftist pro-big government, anti-gun rant.

If you take the guns away from the people, no militia could form in times of need. I am not going to join a militia as things stand, but if they keep moving the way they are, then I may want to. If you take the guns away, that option won't be open to me.

Furthermore, something about cold dead hands is coming to my mind.

I'm asking how the militia could even begin to halt "federal government trespasses" as the Oklahoma Tea Parties claim it's meant to do. Also, isn't the Oklahoma National Guard their militia?

I didn't once say anything about taking guns away from anyone. Just the idea presented in the article linked.
 
I'm asking how the militia could even begin to halt "federal government trespasses" as the Oklahoma Tea Parties claim it's meant to do. Also, isn't the Oklahoma National Guard their militia?

I didn't once say anything about taking guns away from anyone. Just the idea presented in the article linked.


The Oklahoma national guard is as interested in the safety and well being of the citizens of Oklahoma as the Oklahoma City Thunder. Every state national guard acts in support of the national military. They are there to sandbag rivers and be jackasses at bars.

The only true militia has to be of the people. Remember, a small group of concerned citizens is all that has ever been able to change the world. The terrorist forces we fight in Afghanistan would have to be the model for a militia in these days in times. If the US Armed Forces rolled through and tried to impose the will of Obama, the people would have to resort to IED's.

That's kind of sad to think about, but it's the way it would have to be. They have tanks.
 
The Oklahoma national guard is as interested in the safety and well being of the citizens of Oklahoma as the Oklahoma City Thunder. Every state national guard acts in support of the national military. They are there to sandbag rivers and be jackasses at bars.

The only true militia has to be of the people. Remember, a small group of concerned citizens is all that has ever been able to change the world. The terrorist forces we fight in Afghanistan would have to be the model for a militia in these days in times. If the US Armed Forces rolled through and tried to impose the will of Obama, the people would have to resort to IED's.

That's kind of sad to think about, but it's the way it would have to be. They have tanks.

Okay, that makes sense I 'spose. The Tea Partiers aren't as batshit as I originally assumed. It'd be the same as if Bush declared martial law for some batshit crazy reason. We'd need a militia to fight back.

I'll get you the link the next time Batman has another match. He's only beaten 3 people so far because of my awesome debating skillz.

I have an editor. What what?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top