Back then was a very different time for wrestling, holding the title for a year was regular. The fact that Orton managed to keep the title in this day and age with Triple H And Shawn Michaels around, Jericho making a hot return and Jeff Hardy who was very hot at the time is also very impressive.
but having 3 title reigns that were less than a month isnt. also he lost the title to hhh how many times? also hbk didnt want the title but if he did im sure he would have gotten it.
So Dave Meltzer's opinion is fact now?
no but it is fact that orton doesnt have five star matches and terry does, just like i said.
Orton had incredible success in the WWE years before his prime and will probably be having success years after his prime. So why couldn't Funk?
but we dont know that yet, orton could get hurt and never wrestle again, or he could mess up real bad like he tends to do and not get another chance. you should not vote on what you THINK could happen later in a career because there is no telling.
I don't know if anyone has used this arguement yet, but Orton has destroyed Matt Hardy and has beaten Jeff Hardy as well, both men were trained by the Funks, so why wouldn't Orton beat Terry if he has beaten two of his most popular pupils?
people havent said that because its a terrible arguement. they were trained at DORY funk jrs school not terrys. they are brothers but not the same person, and who you train doesnt have anything to do with your career as a wrestler anyway.