I think you're confused, I'm talking about the original Halloween. I think Rob Zombie's remake was a masterpiece. In his version there WAS a story and there WAS actual characters.
You've got to be fucking kidding me. You consider the remake to be a MASTERPIECE? Wow. Simply wow. I'm a diehard Halloween fan and even I know the remake was B-movie trash at best. The second half isn't bad, but the entire Myers childhood part of the film is so bad it's actually laughable. Turning the Myers family into a white trash bunch of rednecks is simply idiotic.
When did I complain about it being influential? What I said was:
When people say "that's not to say", it means that the upcoming statement isn't releated to their point.
You also said in your original post that Halloween hasn't aged well over time, despite it's influence. You're criticizing a film for being "outdated" when it was one of the first of it's kind. Pretty ignorant.
Why? Because you disagree? O...k...I guess I have no response for that logic lol.
Or, you know, you could actually respond to my point. But you don't know what you're talking about, so it's natural you wouldn't respond.
Lack of plot in a film is absurd??? I...don't even know what to say to that. But dude, you could save a ton of money. Stop paying to see movies, just stare at the wall.
Yeah, it is absurd to complain about a lack of a complex plot in A FUCKING HORROR FILM. If that isn't asinine, I don't know what is. Would you like to start criticizing the lack of plot in Dracula as well? How about Frankenstein?
Some of the most frightening films are those that don't show you everything, including the plot. Something horrible without an explanation is a thousand times more frightening then delving into Myers backstory like Zombie did, which fucking ruined it. Sorry, but seeing white trash Myers killing small animals and crying to his mother doesn't exactly make him a frightening character.
It certainly doesn't need to be "grand and deep". All I ask is that it exists.
And a plot does exist. Are you seriously debating that?
I'm sorry but anyone who finds Horror flicks "FRIGHTENING!" is either under 12, a chick, or a huge pussy. I watch Horror movies like I watch any other movie; to be entertained. A dude roaming around town killing people for no apparent reason doesn't entertain me and it certainly doesn't scare me.
The POINT of a horror film is to frighten you. THAT'S where the entertainment comes from. That's awesome that you're such a hardcore badass tough guy that nothing can scare you, all that means is you're full of shit really though. Tell you what, go watch the film Men Behind the Sun, and tell me how "entertaining" it was.
*sigh*
Wow how can I argue with such a brilliant point as that?
And you've shown you have the mental maturity of a 7 year old. Seriously dude, if you still wet your bed having nightmares about the boogeyman, that's fine but I'm juding Halloween as a film and we AGREE that it has no plot. In my opinion, that means it sucks. If you disagree, fine. I think you judge movies based on the criteria of a child but suit yourself.
I'm sorry, but anyone who's going to sit here and recommend piece of shit films like Otis to people and then slam the original Halloween is a fucking moron. There's no debating that.
We get it, you're so hardcore and tough that nothing in the world could ever frighten you. Awesome. Don't fucking watch horror films then, go online and watch execution videos if all you're looking for is to watch gore.
I'd love for you to explain to me in detail what about the original Halloween makes it a poor film. So far the only thing you've said is that it doesn't have a plot...except it does. But please, I'd love to hear how you know more about film than every single film expert and critic, this should be a fun read.
And if the critics like it, it MUST be good!
When 99.9% of them do? Yeah, it probably is. If something is bad, odds are someone is going to see that. When a film receives as much acclaim as Halloween however, that tells you something: that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
The Sleepaway Camp series is one of the most highly praised by Horror fans. But I know Ebert didn't give it two thumbs up so I wouldn't expect you to like it. We obviously have different tastes (well, I probably would have agreed with you when I was 7) and that's fine, there's no need to throw a hissy fit and name-call.
What's humorous here is that I actually love the Sleepaway Camp series, and own the original trilogy. The second film in particular is one of my favorite cheesy B-movie slashers ever. But the new film, Return to Sleepaway Camp...that was fucking abysmal. That was one of the worst films I've ever seen, even by B-Movie standards. You want to talk about lack of plot? What the fuck was the plot in that film?
I've seen literally every genre and theme of horror film that exists, from the goriest most disgusting films like Nacho Cerda's Aftermath or Cannibal Holocaust, to suspense films like Spoorloos. But yes, continue to tell me about how the boogeyman frightens me. If you actually think it's the Myers character himself that frightens people, well, then you're even more stupid then I originally accounted for. Myers is nothing but a representation of evil; and if you want to delve further into it, he's a Puritanical symbolization of evil (it's no coincidence that he just so happens to start killing people on the Pagan celebration of Samhain).
But, I get it, it's too difficult for you to actually analyze a film. Unless some fat kid is slitting someone's throat, you aren't interested. Awesome. You keep your Faces of Death videos, and the rest of us will continue to enjoy a film for what it truly is, and that is a work of art. I actually feel sorry for you that you can't even attempt to analyze a film.