Kinda pointless considering that none were on the level of Candice's WWE title. And aside from the NXT championship none were as prestigious as the current Divas title.
Paige did more good for the Divas title than Candice did for the Women's title, and Paige didn't need Melina, Mickie, or Beth Phoenix to do it.
Already been covered why she's not more accomplished.
Because Candice was put over better talent at the time? Would you make the argument that The Miz was a better WWE Champion than say Eddie Guerrero because he was booked over big names like John Cena and Randy Orton?
Just because a talent is pushed harder than others doesn't mean they're better. Look at the Bellas.
A reign which saw AJ defend against industry titans like Natalya and Brie Bella along with multiple women's matches with no real direction after Kaitlyn's departure early into the reign.
JBL went the same route and it still gets mentioned on here how underrated his reign was. Yes, I agree Candice had more to work with and possibly looked better doing it, but my reason for voting Paige is not because she was put over clearly superior talent, it's because she IS the superior talent.
She held belts that were not as important as the WWE women's belt when Candice held it.
The titles were unified when Paige held the Divas Championship. She held championships prior to working with WWE. She was a wrestler. Candice was another model who didn't even make Top 10 of the Raw Diva Search.
You admit that Candice had better competition when she dominated the women's division, so how can Paige be better for dominating peons that weren't on the same level?
I said she had more to work with, not that she dominated in it. Being a 1 time champion of 4 months and not defending her belt but 2 times, that's not domination. Sounds like writers didn't know what to do with her. At least with Paige she won without the aid of a pool full of pudding.
Subjective. But voting based on favoritism is fine. Though it still doesn't change the fact that Candice was objectively better.
Your entire argument on Candice being better is because she was booked stronger than the top talent for 4 months. That's not objectively better. If Candice actually did something worthwhile with her reign, than I'd say she's better. Right out of the dugout Paige takes the top women's championship and became the youngest doing it.
Candice is better remembered for faking orgasms than being Women's Champion.
Paige's music is pretty awesome and Candice's music was pretty shit. But so is Antonio Cesaro's. But that doesn't make him a worse wrestler than say... Curtis Axel, whose theme song is awesome.
Pretty much. Also doesn't do much to show why Candice shouldn't win this thing.
I think it's a valid argument to say his theme helped kill whatever momentum he had coming out of Wrestlemania XXX. Theme music matters. "Holla" and "What Love Is" are possibly the two worst bits of musical drivel you can strap on a female athlete, and in Candice's era they did it constantly.
If Jim Johnston gives up on you, than so should voters. Vote Paige. She at least defended her gold more than twice.
