It's a simple question, but has a possibly more complex answer.
On the Raw before the Royal Rumble 2009 Vince McMahon made his return to WWE after previously being out 'injured' because of part of the titantron falling on him. He came back to Raw to address Chris Jericho and whether Steph would remain GM. During this period Orton was returning from injury and wanted a title shot, Steph wouldn't give it to him and he and Steph argued. Steph fired Chris Jericho but he was allowed to beg for his job back. Vince then made Orton beg for his job but he wouldn't as he was about to fire him Orton attacked him and punted him in the head. After this we went on with Orton punting Shane after fighting with him, then RKO and DDT Steph whilst Triple H looked on.
So, did the WWE make a mistake by making the McMahons and Triple H the faces in this scenario?
Well, you look at when Vince returned, if I remember correctly, he got a pretty good pop from the crowd, but I think this is irrelevant because most returning wrestlers/characters get a pop. We all know that the Orton, Triple H fued went badly, and still continues to this day, involving Legacy, Batista, Ric Flair and the McMahons. What if the McMahons were the heels all trying to stop Orton and Legacy, and Tirple H helped his wife Steph, because lets face it, Triple H is a much better heel than he is a face.
So, what if Orton, instead of punting McMahon had just RKO'd him instead, turning him into a tweener SCSA type of character. Orton could still win the Rumble and use it like he did, saying he won and has a contract saying that he could fight at Wrestlemania. This way he can still fight Shane and Steph could use Triple H to try and take out Orton, leading to hopefully a better match at Wrestlemania which Orton should have won. This would have also lead to more storyline twists with Orton as a tweener champ, opening the door for him to then al;ign with McMahon and become a fully fledged heel.
I think that the WWE dropped the ball, the Mr. McMahon character is made for being a heel. Everyone hates their boss and wants to imagine that its themselves that are in the ring hurting their boss. The SCSA character was so popular because of the fueds with Vince, and to be fair he played his part very well because you hated him and wanted to see him get a stunner. Also when Vince is a heel, more storyline options are open with Vince screwing people over. Steph and Shane, in my opinion, should also be heels, vying for control of the WWE, trying to impess Vince. They should be heels beause they are authority figures and authority figures should be either impartial or heel.
Look at the past, WWE was far more successful with Vince as a heel and seeing him as a face just doesn't work, most people can't identify with his character because they are just the average joe who doesn't own a company, but rather hate the people that do own companies. Now i'm not even suggesting Orton should be a face/ tweener, I just used that as an example. However, I definately do not think that Vince McMahon should be a face character, he has too much history and his character is too developed to be a face, people are meant to hate him, so why would they start to like him just because he got punted?
I think that turning the McMahons face definately did some damage to not just the Orton Triple H fued, but the WWE in general. Vince is there to screw people over and to be hated by faces and the crowd alike.
Is it just me? Or do you think that the McMahons should be heel characters?
On the Raw before the Royal Rumble 2009 Vince McMahon made his return to WWE after previously being out 'injured' because of part of the titantron falling on him. He came back to Raw to address Chris Jericho and whether Steph would remain GM. During this period Orton was returning from injury and wanted a title shot, Steph wouldn't give it to him and he and Steph argued. Steph fired Chris Jericho but he was allowed to beg for his job back. Vince then made Orton beg for his job but he wouldn't as he was about to fire him Orton attacked him and punted him in the head. After this we went on with Orton punting Shane after fighting with him, then RKO and DDT Steph whilst Triple H looked on.
So, did the WWE make a mistake by making the McMahons and Triple H the faces in this scenario?
Well, you look at when Vince returned, if I remember correctly, he got a pretty good pop from the crowd, but I think this is irrelevant because most returning wrestlers/characters get a pop. We all know that the Orton, Triple H fued went badly, and still continues to this day, involving Legacy, Batista, Ric Flair and the McMahons. What if the McMahons were the heels all trying to stop Orton and Legacy, and Tirple H helped his wife Steph, because lets face it, Triple H is a much better heel than he is a face.
So, what if Orton, instead of punting McMahon had just RKO'd him instead, turning him into a tweener SCSA type of character. Orton could still win the Rumble and use it like he did, saying he won and has a contract saying that he could fight at Wrestlemania. This way he can still fight Shane and Steph could use Triple H to try and take out Orton, leading to hopefully a better match at Wrestlemania which Orton should have won. This would have also lead to more storyline twists with Orton as a tweener champ, opening the door for him to then al;ign with McMahon and become a fully fledged heel.
I think that the WWE dropped the ball, the Mr. McMahon character is made for being a heel. Everyone hates their boss and wants to imagine that its themselves that are in the ring hurting their boss. The SCSA character was so popular because of the fueds with Vince, and to be fair he played his part very well because you hated him and wanted to see him get a stunner. Also when Vince is a heel, more storyline options are open with Vince screwing people over. Steph and Shane, in my opinion, should also be heels, vying for control of the WWE, trying to impess Vince. They should be heels beause they are authority figures and authority figures should be either impartial or heel.
Look at the past, WWE was far more successful with Vince as a heel and seeing him as a face just doesn't work, most people can't identify with his character because they are just the average joe who doesn't own a company, but rather hate the people that do own companies. Now i'm not even suggesting Orton should be a face/ tweener, I just used that as an example. However, I definately do not think that Vince McMahon should be a face character, he has too much history and his character is too developed to be a face, people are meant to hate him, so why would they start to like him just because he got punted?
I think that turning the McMahons face definately did some damage to not just the Orton Triple H fued, but the WWE in general. Vince is there to screw people over and to be hated by faces and the crowd alike.
Is it just me? Or do you think that the McMahons should be heel characters?