I think they need to get the U.S. title off of The Miz so they can focus him completely on the main event and World title level scene. I think Daniel Bryan would be a great champ for all the reasons that people listed.
Nevertheless, I think it's too soon. I don't buy people just coming right in and winning a major title in less than a year. I didn't buy it with Sheamus. I didn't buy it with Rocky Maivia. It just doesn't make sense unless the person was an established superstar at another major company, and at this point there isn't another such company.
If Daniel Bryan hadn't been released by WWE earlier in the year, and there had been time to build him up with the WWE's audience, I think he'd be in a better position although still a bit too soon.
It's too bad WWE doesn't have its version of the "TV Championship" from WCW days so as to allow some of the lower card wrestlers to get pushed. I know, I know -- too many titles, but I think someone shouldn't even be winning the I-C or U.S. titles without at least a year's worth of experience let alone the World titles...
Nevertheless, I think it's too soon. I don't buy people just coming right in and winning a major title in less than a year. I didn't buy it with Sheamus. I didn't buy it with Rocky Maivia. It just doesn't make sense unless the person was an established superstar at another major company, and at this point there isn't another such company.
If Daniel Bryan hadn't been released by WWE earlier in the year, and there had been time to build him up with the WWE's audience, I think he'd be in a better position although still a bit too soon.
It's too bad WWE doesn't have its version of the "TV Championship" from WCW days so as to allow some of the lower card wrestlers to get pushed. I know, I know -- too many titles, but I think someone shouldn't even be winning the I-C or U.S. titles without at least a year's worth of experience let alone the World titles...