Mustang Sally
Sells seashells by the seashore
Actually, it's kind of refreshing reading this topic, in which many folks are agreeing that Cody is bland and uninspiring. For a couple of years, I've been reading posts talking about what a great wrestler he is.......and realizing that how one is regarded as a performer has everything to do with how Creative is treating him/her.
I'm hesitant to throw Drew McIntyre at you again (but I'm going to, anyway). On this board, I've read multiple posts proclaiming that Drew is terrible and Cody is great. Really, though, what definable difference is there between the two? Both are young, have terrific physiques, do fine work in the ring..... and have rather bland personalities. The only thing I can see to separate them is that the writers (through management) have provided Cody with tons of material to work with, from featured tag teams to narcissism to paper bags over the head, while Drew sits around waiting for something to be thrown his way.
What Cody has done to earn such preferential treatment is unknown to me (a famous father?), but if it's eventually decided he's not going to make it as a top-tier performer, it won't be because no one ever gave him a chance.
Some of you in this topic have pointed out that Cody hasn't done much these past months. That's true, and it's illustrative of the notion that when he isn't being pushed to the stars, there's not all that much to him. He's a good ring performer, but so are a lot of other folks.
In presence, I think Cody and Drew are strikingly similar......but in impact, they're amazingly different because one is favored and the other is kept in the twilight zone.
Don't ever think a performer makes it all by himself. He needs the machine behind him to get noticed in the first place......and no one is a better example of that than Cody Rhodes.
I'm hesitant to throw Drew McIntyre at you again (but I'm going to, anyway). On this board, I've read multiple posts proclaiming that Drew is terrible and Cody is great. Really, though, what definable difference is there between the two? Both are young, have terrific physiques, do fine work in the ring..... and have rather bland personalities. The only thing I can see to separate them is that the writers (through management) have provided Cody with tons of material to work with, from featured tag teams to narcissism to paper bags over the head, while Drew sits around waiting for something to be thrown his way.
What Cody has done to earn such preferential treatment is unknown to me (a famous father?), but if it's eventually decided he's not going to make it as a top-tier performer, it won't be because no one ever gave him a chance.
Some of you in this topic have pointed out that Cody hasn't done much these past months. That's true, and it's illustrative of the notion that when he isn't being pushed to the stars, there's not all that much to him. He's a good ring performer, but so are a lot of other folks.
In presence, I think Cody and Drew are strikingly similar......but in impact, they're amazingly different because one is favored and the other is kept in the twilight zone.
Don't ever think a performer makes it all by himself. He needs the machine behind him to get noticed in the first place......and no one is a better example of that than Cody Rhodes.