Bring Back Heat and Velocity

[uguess94]

The title says it all................but seriously I want these back the little hour

shows were great especially on a PPV night Sunday Night Heat actually played a

big part in some of the storylines not so much Velocity but if you do it right you

can maybe incorporate the cruiserweights back into the action with Velocity

basically all I want is an 2 hours each week of solid good in ring action how

come the best ring action we see all year is Undertaker's Wrestlemania match &

any CM Punk match its bull and we deserve these shows back & maybe you can

use the last 15 min on a solid match that you build up for on the beginning and

use the first 30-40 min on Heat for that pre-game RAW show you were talking

about yeah why dont you put it on Sunday and give some exposure to BOTH

shows and conduct interviews with Wrestlers and further storylines and give us

a recap of what happened that week on both shows and dare I say I WANT

WRESTLERS TO HAVE WIN/LOSS RECORDS & A POINT SYSTEM!!!!!!!!!! Come on

all we want is a standard way to tell who really deserves a title shot how about

this we keep records each month and the wrestler who has the most points and

gets a WWE Title shot and you can do storylines with wrestlers being tied so its

a triple threat or something like that but either way you can make it sooooooo

much better by bringing these shows back and winning by PIN gets you more

than say a DQ win or Count Out win but either way I think any variation of this

is great but seriously gtfo with NXT and Superstars they are simply ******ed and

have no reason to watch unless you would like to see pointless kid humor (not

soo much Superstars they can have good matches sometimes)

 

[Uproar]

Heat and velocity were never my cup of tea, i'm a bit stuck on the current 'superstars' of the era. However it's people like myself who don't help (with tv views/ratings) get the younger up and coming superstars in to that limelight. We however have superstars, something i watch rarely, unless nothing else is on a Saturday morning, then i put Sky1 on. So to see two shows come back when we are on the verge of WWE's very own station is out of the question, maybe when shows on that channel start to become dry bring them back would be a good idea for the really young stars.

The idea NXT had was brilliant in Season 1, and after that lost interest but if they bought heat/velocity back they could use the same scenario but make it work this time, allowing more Tag team bouts and all these questions on WWE.com such as "do you want the hardcore championship back" they could use these shows as test runs. The rising stars use these championships as leverage to be put in to Raw/Smackdown.

I would like to see another variation of Raw/Smackdown tho, for more bigger stars to be shown, Because there are big stars being left out week after week on both of these and then become future endeavoured, ECW worked but i am slow and i never understood why it was scraped.

 

[closet_fan]

I'd like one of these to be more of a recap show for both Raw and Smackdown rather than it's own show featuring "dark" matches.

BTW, why would you go out of your way to double space your sentences?

And let me throw you one of these: . Periods are your friend.

 

[entertainer101]

The title says it all................but seriously I want these back the little hour

shows were great especially on a PPV night Sunday Night Heat actually played a

big part in some of the storylines not so much Velocity but if you do it right you

can maybe incorporate the cruiserweights back into the action with Velocity

basically all I want is an 2 hours each week of solid good in ring action how

come the best ring action we see all year is Undertaker's Wrestlemania match &

any CM Punk match its bull and we deserve these shows back & maybe you can

use the last 15 min on a solid match that you build up for on the beginning and

use the first 30-40 min on Heat for that pre-game RAW show you were talking

about yeah why dont you put it on Sunday and give some exposure to BOTH

shows and conduct interviews with Wrestlers and further storylines and give us

a recap of what happened that week on both shows and dare I say I WANT

WRESTLERS TO HAVE WIN/LOSS RECORDS & A POINT SYSTEM!!!!!!!!!! Come on

all we want is a standard way to tell who really deserves a title shot how about

this we keep records each month and the wrestler who has the most points and

gets a WWE Title shot and you can do storylines with wrestlers being tied so its

a triple threat or something like that but either way you can make it sooooooo

much better by bringing these shows back and winning by PIN gets you more

than say a DQ win or Count Out win but either way I think any variation of this

is great but seriously gtfo with NXT and Superstars they are simply ******ed and

have no reason to watch unless you would like to see pointless kid humor (not

soo much Superstars they can have good matches sometimes)

THANKS AND PLEASE DO THE POLL!!!!!!!!!

Moron, if you want good in ring action, just watch impact or ROH. Impact will probably give you screwy booking at the end of the match just like WWE, but at least you'll get good in ring action like you want. WWE isn't the only wrestling organization.

 

[DJ Kyo]

imho, Heat was only great before PPVs. Honestly, I think HEAT would do them some good if they had it before PPVs. It's kind of like how UFC has "Prelims on Spike' before their main events. It's smart marketing AND it gives newer talent a chance to shine. On a regular basis though, HEAT would not be good to bring back. The once a month PPV affair would be great, but not beyond that.

I was never a fan of velocity, so I won't vote for it. Though I will say when I was growing up in the 90's I LOVED the short stint of "Shotgun Saturday Night." - Now that was the show back in the day. The first day of Triple H, the Hardy Boys, Edge & Christian! Pure awesmeness that show was!

 

[Serious Mozzarella]

Yeah, sure, these shows existed.

But then ratings tanked. Then people were getting confused because storylines were progressing on a show nobody was watching. Then they stopped progressing storylines on those shows. Then they became useless paperweight shows that nobody cared about.

There's no reason to bring them back if even Raw is suffering, ratings-wise.

 

[DeathClutch]

How about no?

But wait, what if HEAT was an hourly womens only show and VELOCITY is this new cruiserweight show their possibly doing on the network and cut NXT & Superstars.
Might sound like their going back over but it could work with the correct show writers and storylines and keeping the rheotic of off both RAW and Smackdown.

 

[ECW Dan Selby]

Uh. What can I say that hasn't already been said... Not much. But let's recap:

*Write properly
*Use the 'Return' key properly
*Why would you want Heat/Velocity back when all you'd probably do is moan that it isn't what you want it to be, and want Superstars to come back instead?

It's nostalgia. You don't want those shows back, you just want the Attitude era back. I'd suggest either checking out ROH like someone mentioned above, or watch all the old Heat/Velocity episodes. I'm sure there's enough of them to chew on for some time.

 

[#hamler]

You butchered that entrie paragraph.

Basically all I want is 2 hours each week of solid good in ring action. How come the best ring action we see all year is Undertaker's Wrestlemania match & any CM Punk match? It's bull and we deserve these shows back

Yeah, no seems about right. Out of all of that, this is the only reason I see given. There have been plenty of good in ring matches this year. You just have to put down the remote, stop pushing fast forward and actually watch the show. I think this is shit reasoning to bring back two mediocre shows which, in the past, have produced very few classics. Velocity and Heat were just shows used to get talent some air time. Sure I would be absolutely fine with bringing back pre-ppv shows but Heat and Velocity on a regular basis isn’t needed. The WWE brought back Superstars for a reason. Why not utilize Superstars instead of wasting money bringing back the two shows?

 

[Paralyzer Z]

The title says it all................but seriously I want these back the little hour

First off why are you writing in this form? It's hardly legible and it looks rather silly.

shows were great especially on a PPV night Sunday Night Heat actually played a

big part in some of the storylines not so much Velocity but if you do it right you

can maybe incorporate the cruiserweights back into the action with Velocity

The only instance where Heat ever played a big part in WWE is at Wrestlemania 19 when Nathan Jones was taken out by A-train. Out of all the years it ran that's the only moment in it's history that I thought the show was relevant. As for Velocity, there is no need for a cruiserweight division at all. It just restricts small guy that otherwise could have other opportunities. Look at guys like Ziggler, Bryan and Miz who would all be detained in a cruiserweight division if it had remained in existence during their careers so far.

basically all I want is an 2 hours each week of solid good in ring action how

come the best ring action we see all year is Undertaker's Wrestlemania match &

Undertaker is one of the best in ring veterans in the business! With his experience in the ring how can you not expect him to have the best matches of the year?

any CM Punk match its bull and we deserve these shows back & maybe you can

I believe it's "is bull" not its bull. Enlighten me, how would the quality of superstar ring work on a C-show be superior to that of one of the top faces of the company?

use the last 15 min on a solid match that you build up for on the beginning and

use the first 30-40 min on Heat for that pre-game RAW show you were talking

about yeah why dont you put it on Sunday and give some exposure to BOTH

shows and conduct interviews with Wrestlers and further storylines and give us

a recap of what happened that week on both shows and dare I say I WANT

WRESTLERS TO HAVE WIN/LOSS RECORDS & A POINT SYSTEM!!!!!!!!!! Come on

A record of Win and losses for WWE superstars? How on god's green earth would that benefit anyone? What if an already establish superstar has far more losses than wins? Does that help with their image in your mind?

all we want is a standard way to tell who really deserves a title shot how about

this we keep records each month and the wrestler who has the most points and

gets a WWE Title shot and you can do storylines with wrestlers being tied so its

a triple threat or something like that but either way you can make it sooooooo

much better by bringing these shows back and winning by PIN gets you more

than say a DQ win or Count Out win but either way I think any variation of this

is great but seriously gtfo with NXT and Superstars they are simply ******ed and

have no reason to watch unless you would like to see pointless kid humor (not

soo much Superstars they can have good matches sometimes)

The WWE championship #1 contender should be decided on a show no one would give 2 shits about?

THANKS AND PLEASE DO THE POLL!!!!!!!!!

 

[Jake Jay Lee]

I'm choosing to ignore the poor grammar, it's hard, but because I have a real answer:

Bring back HeAT! on Sundays (pre-recorder of course) BUT put in on free TV like it once was. For example in the UK have it on E4, say 9pm on a Sunday where it'll fit in. I can't say for the USA because I don't live there.

All I hear is how TNA is kicking the WWE's arse in the UK, hey guess what: TNA is on free TV. When HeAT was on CH4 (this is pre-digital) at about 11pm it had insane viewing figures and was the reason why CH4 got to show PPVs including the Royal Rumble in 2001!

Keep the 60 minute run time (about 50 minutes after ads) use 10 minutes to run down Raw and Smackdown (like they did) and use the rest to show off matches with the Light Heavyweights, have the World or WWE Champion on once in a blue moon (they once had both HHH, The Rock and Steve Austin in one show). If it's written well, even have minor titles change hands, and before you say it I watched the Light Heavyweight, IC and European Championships change at least once when it ran on CH4. Hell the Hardcore title could change more than once a show.

I know that one could say why don't they just make a deal with CH4 to show Superstars on E4 (and I don't think WWE would fit with any other channel these days), but most of the old WWE fans that stopped watching it when it went off CH4 wont know the Superstar brand... Also I have seen it and it's kinda shit.

At one point HeAT was a great show, it had it's own story arcs that even lead to a match at a PPV (often the free PPVs on CH4), the writing was superb and it was a great training ground while they often had the odd "big name" star show up. The WWE wants to be unpredictable, HeAT was and that's why I watched in over 10 years ago.

 

[HellBoundPower]

There is really no point in bringing these shows back. They already have the equivalent of them with NXT and Superstars. NXT is obviously an outdated concept by now, and they haven't really had strives on picking a winner of the current season for quite awhile. Superstars has good back and forth wrestling matches with people lower on the card. If you wanna see decent wrestling with not much storyline, Superstars is where you go.

So what would be the point in bringing in two more shows to essentially fill the same role? It's rather pointless. And while I do agree with HEAT before PPVs being the cool thing about that show, it would be pointless to add another show in the first place. Now, if they were to get rid of NXT, and possibly put Superstars on Sundays before a PPV, that would work. But I don't see them doing that, so this is really all just pointless banter.

 

[De Mysteriis Dom Satanas]

Terrible writing aside, there's really no reason for either show to be brought back. The market's already saturated as it is, and more shows would dilute the product/burn out the audience. It's fine as a lead-in to a pay-per-view, but as a weekly show? Not worth the production cost.

 

[Mr. HD]

Bring back Heat and Velocity as Weekly shows? No.

But if you bring Heat as a preshow then that works for me.

Velocity, not so much. In a WWE where the Brand Extension pretty much doesn't exist anymore, Velocity would be a bit pointless cause it was SmackDown related.

A Heat preshow would probably boost ppv buys and increase anticipation for the show like it did back in the Attitude Era. Promos shown here and there, a look at the set, any last comments from the superstars, etc..

But that probably won't happen. It'd be pretty cool if it did for just ppv preshows but as weekly shows to showcase talent? That's what Superstars and NXT are for.

 

[TempestH]

There is no need for a cruiserweight division at all. It just restricts small guy that otherwise could have other opportunities. Look at guys like Ziggler, Bryan and Miz who would all be detained in a cruiserweight division if it had remained in existence during their careers so far.

I kind of disagree on this. Yes, there might have been a glass ceiling if a cruiserweight division were still around, but Bryan, Ziggler, and Miz would've probably broken it for different reasons. Miz managed to bulk himself up right at the title's weight limit. People compare Miz to Jericho. Look at how Jericho held the IC title in between World Title reigns. Miz could do the same with the Cruiserweight Championship if he had it. Plus Miz's character is arrogant enough that I can see him calling the CW title the "World Cruiserweight Championship." And look how small Cena and Orton are compared to the heavyweights of the past. The gap between heavyweights and cruiserweights is pretty small these days.

 

[Paralyzer Z]

Miz managed to bulk himself up right at the title's weight limit. People compare Miz to Jericho. Look at how Jericho held the IC title in between World Title reigns. Miz could do the same with the Cruiserweight Championship if he had it. Plus Miz's character is arrogant enough that I can see him calling the CW title the "World Cruiserweight Championship." And look how small Cena and Orton are compared to the heavyweights of the past. The gap between heavyweights and cruiserweights is pretty small these days.

Miz isn't exactly the best example of my reasoning but Bryan and Ziggler are. Miz has a style that resembles a brawler and is closer to the traditional big man size than others. Regardless of size those 2 wrestle a different style than Miz or even heavyweights such as HHH, and Orton. Both are small (in comparison to traditional big guys) and wrestle a cruiserweight style or something very similar to it, it's faster paced basically. WWE before recent years has always looked at the build and larger than life size to judge a guy so he could appeal to like WWE wants to, like a guy who is larger than life.

WWE's cruiserweight as the past has showed was always the place WWE put the smaller men of that era. In fact I am almost certain that Bryan and Ziggler would have been put there for life had the division not vanished. Hell I saw the ridding of the division as a chance for lighter guys to show what they've got. We got Punk, Bryan, and Ziggler as a result. Look at guys like Jimmy wang Yang, Tajiri, Paul London, and Chavo Guerrero who were all exceptionally talented but where contained and restricted to division. That was a time where Vince saw Cena and Orton's build and categorized them with the large men (truth be told they are not all that close to "small guy size"). Now WWE with a new mindset has let men that would previously have been put in an under card cruiserweight division, have the opportunity to shine.

Neither Heat, Velocity, nor the cruiserweight division are needed anymore in the current WWE product.

 

[¡Roján!]

First off why are you writing in this form? It's hardly legible and it looks rather silly.

Kind of like you then, huh?

As for Velocity, there is no need for a cruiserweight division at all. It just restricts small guy that otherwise could have other opportunities. Look at guys like Ziggler, Bryan and Miz who would all be detained in a cruiserweight division if it had remained in existence during their careers so far.

First, The Miz isn't a cruiserweight. Second, I don't remember stars like Rey Mysterio, Eddie Guerrero, Chris Jericho and Chris Benoit being held back after fighting for the Cruiserweight championship. They started off their, and after impressing, and gaining a crowd following (something which wrestlers like Tyson Kidd, Trent Barreta, Curt Hawkins and The Usos, for example, need) went on to better things. It doesn't hold you back, hell, it gets you further, half the time. Take Alberto del Rio. He tanked after being thrusted into the main event without gaining crowd's interest. How good would a show like Heat or Velocity have done him for a while before making an immediate impact?

Undertaker is one of the best in ring veterans in the business! With his experience in the ring how can you not expect him to have the best matches of the year?

He didn't he say he didn't expect it...

I believe it's "is bull" not its bull. Enlighten me, how would the quality of superstar ring work on a C-show be superior to that of one of the top faces of the company?

Tyson Kidd can wrestle rings around John Cena. True or false? Thought so.

Thanks for sum up your own post for me. Look, you do have some sort of function afterall.

The WWE championship #1 contender should be decided on a show no one would give 2 shits about?

Maybe if the WWE built it up to be a show that people did care about, then there would be no issue. And, that's what I think it boils down to. Let's face it, Superstars and NXT are just a revamped version of Velocity and Heat, no? There is no need to bring back Heat and Velocity when you have them. What they do need is effort, which WWE doesn't put in to them, anymore. John Cena used to wrestle and be a Pro on NXT for goodness sake. At that time, they were popping huge ratings and they were even acknowledge by the WWE on Smackdown and on RAW (I know, me neither). Basically, with the launch of the WWE network soon they really should put a bit more effort into NXT and Superstars. Add a title, add a few feuds, make it feel important. Superstars like Trent Barreta, Tyson Kidd and the other afore mentioned superstars could really benefit from this show. Still though, the WWE is never going to do this because, let's face it, they've become too lazy. And, they can afford to be, at the moment.

 

[Paralyzer Z]

Kind of like you then, huh?

Everyone is silly at one point or another. It's human nature.

First, The Miz isn't a cruiserweight.

I said that in my second post.

Second, I don't remember stars like Rey Mysterio, Eddie Guerrero, Chris Jericho and Chris Benoit being held back after fighting for the Cruiserweight championship. They started off their, and after impressing, and gaining a crowd following (something which wrestlers like Tyson Kidd, Trent Barreta, Curt Hawkins and The Usos, for example, need) went on to better things. It doesn't hold you back, hell, it gets you further, half the time. Take Alberto del Rio. He tanked after being thrusted into the main event without gaining crowd's interest. How good would a show like Heat or Velocity have done him for a while before making an immediate impact?

You can't get a good crowd following if no one watches the show. Superstars is the modern day equivalent to the former Heat and Velocity, most guys that are on there (spare Ryder) have remained there for awhile with no progress. Just as NXT showed after it's first few weeks not too many people care to see a show about the younger talent, they want the younger talent involved in the main shows and to see them develop there. Those guys you listed are the best out of many talents that were held back by the Cruiserweight division. They went on to break out in WWE because they were that good. Remember WCW's "Vanilla midget" theory in which the lighter Cruiserweight guys where restricted? All of those guys were held back because of their size, and once they went to WWE they broke out (not immediateness but over time). Putting guys on Heat and Velocity is like saying that they are not good enough for the main shows (or to develop on them EX: Brodus Clay getting over due to large Raw audiences.)

He didn't he say he didn't expect it...

Tyson Kidd can wrestle rings around John Cena. True or false? Thought so.

False

Thanks for sum up your own post for me. Look, you do have some sort of function afterall.

And you claim I am a pompous asshole .


Maybe if the WWE built it up to be a show that people did care about, then there would be no issue.[/QUOTE]

They do, it's called Superstars[/I. If they didn't care about they guys on there they wouldn't have contracts, and look how long most guys have been stuck there.

And, that's what I think it boils down to. Let's face it, Superstars and NXT are just a revamped version of Velocity and Heat, no? There is no need to bring back Heat and Velocity when you have them.

My point exactly.

What they do need is effort, which WWE doesn't put in to them, anymore. John Cena used to wrestle and be a Pro on NXT for goodness sake. At that time, they were popping huge ratings and they were even acknowledge by the WWE on Smackdown and on RAW (I know, me neither). Basically, with the launch of the WWE network soon they really should put a bit more effort into NXT and Superstars. Add a title, add a few feuds, make it feel important. Superstars like Trent Barreta, Tyson Kidd and the other afore mentioned superstars could really benefit from this show. Still though, the WWE is never going to do this because, let's face it, they've become too lazy. And, they can afford to be, at the moment.

First off I can't recall Cena ever being on NXT.

Second off I can't say I disagree. Superstars and Nxt's lifeline are driven by the fact that they air on TV in other parts of the world. Not because they are successfully and consistently building new stars up.

 

[Khalifa]

Just no, I feel stupid to even having to write why so I will keep it short and sharp. WWE has too many shows now. They did back then and they did when ECW was on. Velocity/Heat/ECW/Nexus all don't draw anything so why would they even waste money on it. Nobody would even pay to see those two shows because all it did was focus on guys that couldn't get on the main card. The main card is even lackluster for most Raws/Smackdown/PPVS so heat would be terrible. No doubt someone like Curt Hawkins would main event every week.

Wow it sounds even more bad when I typed it out.

 

[¡Roján!]

Everyone is silly at one point or another. It's human nature.

Some are evidently better than other, though.

I said that in my second post.

Still doesn't erase the fact that you say something like that in the first place.

You can't get a good crowd following if no one watches the show. Superstars is the modern day equivalent to the former Heat and Velocity, most guys that are on there (spare Ryder) have remained there for awhile with no progress. Just as NXT showed after it's first few weeks not too many people care to see a show about the younger talent, they want the younger talent involved in the main shows and to see them develop there. Those guys you listed are the best out of many talents that were held back by the Cruiserweight division. They went on to break out in WWE because they were that good. Remember WCW's "Vanilla midget" theory in which the lighter Cruiserweight guys where restricted? All of those guys were held back because of their size, and once they went to WWE they broke out (not immediateness but over time). Putting guys on Heat and Velocity is like saying that they are not good enough for the main shows (or to develop on them EX: Brodus Clay getting over due to large Raw audiences.)

Yes, NXT and Superstars are the equivalent of Heat and Velocity. And, like I said before if they do a few things, like the ones I mentioned before, they could actually get people to watch. Honestly, your reading comprehension skills are very poor.

Mistake on my party. I'll rephrase: THE OP NEVER ONCE SAID THAT HE DIDN'T EXPECT THE UNDERTAKER TO PUT ON THE BEST MATCH OF THE YEAR. Stop putting words in people's mouths.

False

Okay, listen close. I mean to say wrestling, as in pure wrestling. Not a sports entertainer, a wrestler. If this doesn't change your answer then, you're stupider than I thought. Tyson Kidd as an athlete is better than John Cena. John Cena, however, has better mic skills, is more marketable and fits the WWE bill. That's why Cena is main-eventing.

They do, it's called Superstars[/I. If they didn't care about they guys on there they wouldn't have contracts, and look how long most guys have been stuck there.

You think people care about Superstars? For fudge sake, man, you're making it hard to debate with your mind-less drivel. Literally, 1,000 people probably watch Superstars. The only reason it's still on the air is because they have a contract. They need low-card jobbers to fill up the show. Trust me, if NXT and Superstars weren't around, say goodbye to Heath Slater, Trent Barreta, Tyson Kidd, etc...

 

[Mighty NorCal]

Yes, fucking A, yes. I have no clue how no one who gets paid to do such things hasnt seen fit to consolidate the heaping plate of clusterfuck that is Superstars / NXT, and how they are televised.

Film Heat before RAW, film Velocity before SD. Throw some NXT guys into the mix. Make it a two hour block of programming, either on Sci Fi on Saturday evening (like there is something fucking better on there?) or gee, I dont know, maybe the damn Youtube channel and Network you fucking own.

Have the tag titles and mid card titles generally headline the show. Pretty fucking simple.

 

[HBKistheHOF]

Are you people all idiots???

NXT is garbage and Superstars doesn't even air anymore. In an era when the WWE Network will be launched soon why not bring something like these(maybe not same names) on and have basically a sub-samckdown show with talent thats not used and maybe some FCW guys and really invest in story lines? This could be great!!

 

[Paralyzer Z]

Yes, NXT and Superstars are the equivalent of Heat and Velocity. And, like I said before if they do a few things, like the ones I mentioned before, they could actually get people to watch. Honestly, your reading comprehension skills are very poor.

I concur, you're repeating what I said in my initial post over and over again.

Okay, listen close. I mean to say wrestling, as in pure wrestling. Not a sports entertainer, a wrestler. If this doesn't change your answer then, you're stupider than I thought. Tyson Kidd as an athlete is better than John Cena. John Cena, however, has better mic skills, is more marketable and fits the WWE bill. That's why Cena is main-eventing.

Now that you clear up the question I can see where you are coming from. However the manner in which you did implies that you are in an emotional state as of the moment you typed that.

You think people care about Superstars? For fudge sake, man, you're making it hard to debate with your mind-less drivel. Literally, 1,000 people probably watch Superstars. The only reason it's still on the air is because they have a contract. They need low-card jobbers to fill up the show. Trust me, if NXT and Superstars weren't around, say goodbye to Heath Slater, Trent Barreta, Tyson Kidd, etc...

Once again you are reiterating what I said in this first place, no one cares about Superstars and due to that you can make the inference that no one would care about Heat or Velocity either. In all honesty it is you're comprehension skills that need honing. C-shows like Heat ,Velocity, Superstars, and NXT are never cared for nor would your suggestion be either.

You are the one who is making it hard to debate, the final portion of your first post basically agreed with everything I said in the first place (excluding your idea to improve C-shows).

 

[Why Always Me]

Heat should only be used in the hour before a PPV.

I would say either tape 3 matches at Raw and then 3 matches at Smackdown and have Superstars be on for 90 minutes, or have Superstars and Velocity be an hour each, with 4 matches on each.

 

[XXJJ]

I wouldn't mind if they brought back Heat before every ppv. It would kind of be a like a pregame to the ppv. But I dont think they need to air Heat every week.

Superstars basically replaced Heat and Velocity. I'm sure when WWE network gets going they will put Superstars on its channel.