Why does it feel like some dirt sheet "reporter" got his info wrong, announced that his contract is up a year earlier than it should and then all the rest of the 'sheets pawned it off as their news as well, continuing the chain of bullshit?
It seems like an error, but if it isn't, common logic would tell you that Roode is staying with TNA. Why? Very simple.
If this man wanted more money for the rest of his life, he would've quit TNA back in 2009 when he was a part of a progressively staler tag-team with little chance of him doing something else.
However, he didn't. Not only did he not sign with the WWE despite his position within the company and the distress TNA was in back then, he signed a 5 year contract with them. Does this seem like a man who's planning on leaving for the WWE? The guy signed the dotted line for half a freaking decade. He's made his mind up LONG time ago.
So, in the last 4 years, Bobby Roode not only got out of Beer Money, but he became TNA World Champion, a solid Main Eventer, a current tag-team Champion in arguably one of the most entertaining tag-teams in recent history which has him featured on TV on a weekly basis. Moreover, Roode has shown ZERO displeasure with TNA over the course of these 4 years. He has a solid position in the company and the pay seems to not be a problem. Roode is happy with TNA, TNA is happy with Roode.
Yet, despite all this, this thread has been flooded with many a WWE brainless zombie saying how Roode is so going to go to the WWE or how it'll be so much better for him, and that he should leave because of that gosh darn Aces and Eights.
Well, let's entertain that thought. Let's just say that TNA is a wreck right now. Nothing works, nothing's good. Is the WWE really the company to go to? Is the WWE really a step up, quality wise? Money-wise, hell yeah. But everything else?
Roode has a lucrative deal with TNA. Roode has a great, fluid relationship with TNA. Roode is SOMEONE in TNA. Why would he go to the WWE? So he can be replaced or overshadowed by the return of a former Attitude Era "superstar" or Brock Lesnar? So he can have his gimmick changed three times with absolutely zero explanation or transition between them, resulting in him being dressed in a silly costume and forced to dance?
So his natural wrestling ability and his instincts can be cut right off, and anything that made him Bobby Roode replaced with what the 90 years old, senile and completely out of touch McMahon thinks is cool in 2013?
Why the FUCK would Bobby Roode go to the WWE, aside any financial reasons. So he can rassle in front of the big crowds? TNA's going on the road, love, crowds ain't gonna be as big as WWE's but you can't see jack shit past the first few rows anyway.
This announcement is bullshit, next year - when it is true, Roode will stay with TNA and WWE fans will just have to stick with CM Punk and Daniel Bryan's beard until then.