Which in ring wrestling philosophy do you prefer? TNA's go out and do what you want, or WWE's go out and save all the big spots for PPV's.
I'm on the fence on this. I can see where WWE is coming from by only allowing holy shit moments to be on PPV. But I also want to see there cruiserweights go out and do what they are capable of. Not allowing Paul London to do a Shooting Star Press is stupid. Considering they let Kidman do it for years (Did he ever hit that thing right?) and Lesnar at Mania.
The problem with TNA is that they try to top each bug bump they do. This year A.J. Stles fell of the top of a cage into several superstars, next year he'll do the same wothout anyone to catch him. The bar is getting higher in TNA. But in WWE you find yourself popping for stuff that has been done plenty of times before, and more impressively.
I'm on the fence on this. I can see where WWE is coming from by only allowing holy shit moments to be on PPV. But I also want to see there cruiserweights go out and do what they are capable of. Not allowing Paul London to do a Shooting Star Press is stupid. Considering they let Kidman do it for years (Did he ever hit that thing right?) and Lesnar at Mania.
The problem with TNA is that they try to top each bug bump they do. This year A.J. Stles fell of the top of a cage into several superstars, next year he'll do the same wothout anyone to catch him. The bar is getting higher in TNA. But in WWE you find yourself popping for stuff that has been done plenty of times before, and more impressively.