Best Wrestling Philosophy | WrestleZone Forums

Best Wrestling Philosophy

Status
Not open for further replies.

Y 2 Jake

Slightly Autistic
Which in ring wrestling philosophy do you prefer? TNA's go out and do what you want, or WWE's go out and save all the big spots for PPV's.

I'm on the fence on this. I can see where WWE is coming from by only allowing holy shit moments to be on PPV. But I also want to see there cruiserweights go out and do what they are capable of. Not allowing Paul London to do a Shooting Star Press is stupid. Considering they let Kidman do it for years (Did he ever hit that thing right?) and Lesnar at Mania.

The problem with TNA is that they try to top each bug bump they do. This year A.J. Stles fell of the top of a cage into several superstars, next year he'll do the same wothout anyone to catch him. The bar is getting higher in TNA. But in WWE you find yourself popping for stuff that has been done plenty of times before, and more impressively.
 
That's what makes TNA more popular. They don't care about the money as much as WWE does. Still WWE is smart they make us pop for the crappiest of moves at a PPV, but in TNA people don't pop as much for a move that is 10x harder, and more impressive at Imapct.

To answer the question i do prefer TNA's phylosophy, even though WWE's philosophy makes more money.
 
I think that road schedules and the overall athletic ability of the talent of each roster play a very integral part of what moves are and aren't allowed in the WWE. Taking a guy on the road 300 days a year and working the TNA style would result in many more injuries...if not death. With the TNA schedule, the wrestling can be more conducive to a riskier style. On one hand, I can see where the WWE has been coming from with the limiting of certain maneuvers and offensive sets in the last few years. On the negative side, though, most of the WWE matches that the juniors fight in are boring as shit. I love watching the juniors because they can do things the heavies can't, so why in the fuck did I want to watch London and Kendrick wrestle just a hair above what a guy like HHH does in the ring? Oh, yeah, I don't. Personally, I'm more entertained by what TNA does in the ring from top to bottom on a card. WWE has it's moments...but I typically have to pay $49.95 to get them more often than not...and I opt out of that lickety-split because I've paid for TNA and ROH PPVs that had better action and hotter crowds from bell to bell.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top