So now you know what goes on in my head? You know what I do and don't care about?
For someone who's so concerned about using evidence only observable within a professional wrestling context, I'm surprised you'd limit your observational skills by sticking your head so far up your ass.
Stick to what you know. If that means logging out and never coming back, all the better.
Haha, hectic. All of this I don't kind of understand though.
No I don't know what goes on in your head, but I don't see how that's got anything to do with anything? I was arguing that his crazy events should not be considered when discussing a wrestling match. I have stated plenty of times though that I'm in no way defending what Benoit did.
Even so, many people stated why they didn't vote for Benoit, so I'm not arguing on why Ambrose couldn't win the match based purely on that he is not quite as good as Benoit.
Navi said before that she feels like you can't vote against Benoit because you get called an asshole. I'm not trying to come across that way, no one is. It's just a big topic to debate when someone says Benoit is better in every way but being a good person because he murdered two people, and people obviously have the two furtherest views from each other.
I'll spin Navis statement around a bit but add my own little twist, if you can't vote for Benoit without be called a murder lover then why is he in the tournament. I, as someone who is voting for Benoit this round, think Benoit shouldn't be in the tournament at all if all his accomplishments and in ring ability is torn to shreds because how is he ever going to win. I'm not trying to get Benoit to win and don't care what happens after this round, so just get rid of him for next year.
Also Coco, what don't I know? I'm trying to figure out what I said that was 100% bullshit but I just can't find it.
I might pass on some advice I got earlier in this thread, it's just a fantasy tournament.
A guy who nearly killed the work literally cannot be the best professional wrestler of all time.
Because he is the worst. Ever.
It's that simple.
So yes: Dean Ambrose > the worst professional wrestler of all time. Principle has nothing to do with it. A smart person who takes this tournament seriously would vote Mantaur over Benoit.
That is part of the thing we are arguing. Everyone else's argument for every other wrestler is using examples of them in their prime and are determining the outcome of each match when each wrestler is in their prime, yet Benoit gets the unfair stipulation of him being at his worst.