Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yes.Cuz its Zelda, do I really need to give any more of a reason.
That's why the other couple hundred hours that is quality takes over???I hear you on the extended gameplay, I understand that point but it doesn't mean that the 100 hours of gameplay is quality all the way through.
Your support is two games which came out 10-20 years ago?Zelda is always the safer bet in my experience, I would still take Link to the Past or Ocarina of Time over almost any other game.
Which is understandable, but to someone who doesn't seem to have such loyalties, why would you go for Zelda instead of Elder Scrolls?Because I'm more of a Zelda fan than a Elder Scrolls fan, & Zelda is about the only RPG I've ever really been able to get into
I'd definitely say go for Skyrim. It's annoyingly good. Actually, you probably shouldn't get it, as you won't want to stop playing, I don't remember the last time I've played something this addictive.
Not at all necessary. Recommended to play it though, because it's a great game.Two quick questions, because I'm not really a gamer.
1. Should I play Oblivion before playing Skyrim, or does it matter? Because it sounds interesting, but I don't know if it's absolutely necessary, or even preferable, to play IV before V?
I've never been able to get into Zelda. So someone else might be better to ask.2. How does it compare to Zelda? I have played a coule of the Zelda games and thought they were pretty good, how does Skyrim compare?
Yes.
That's why the other couple hundred hours that is quality takes over???
The time you spend is completely dependent on how much time you want to spend. I could have finished Oblivion's main quest in 20-30 hours (I would guess). However, between side quests, enchanting your weapons and armor, creating your own spells, building potions, etc. you could spend as much time as you wanted.
Your support is two games which came out 10-20 years ago?
Which this OP does not seem to have.I have lots of loyalty to Zelda
That's great...let's look what you said which I quoted:I've played them all (Including Twilight Princess which BTW came out FIVE years ago not 10-20)
I would still take Link to the Past or Ocarina of Time over almost any other game.
Which this OP does not seem to have.
That's great...let's look what you said which I quoted:
Don't see anything about Twilight Princess, as your indignant post would have one believe.
Never said you did. However, if one is not loyal to it, and they're choosing between Skyrim and Zelda, why pick Zelda? That's been my point the entire time.First off you dont need to be loyal to Zelda to enjoy it.
Already possible, you just have to fly backwards REALLY fast.Sly, you know how to do everything.
Create 40 hour days.
Isn't that what cocaine is for? I hear that's how Vince McMahon does it.Or a potion that makes me not need sleep.
Never said you did. However, if one is not loyal to it, and they're choosing between Skyrim and Zelda, why pick Zelda? That's been my point the entire time.
The truth is there is no good reason to recommend Skyrim over Skyward Sword either, graphics and length don't matter, overall experience and gameplay matters
Gameplay and length very much add to the overall experience, so you cannot say they really don't matter. At the end of the day, aside from 1:1 swordplay (which does look intriguing) I doubt there is anything major you can do in Zelda you cannot do in Skyrim. The opposite cannot be said.
I own a website, and I think Skyrim is better. Reviewers will mark Dynasty Warriors 8 at a 5.0 because it's the same game as last time, and yet will rank Call of Duty a 9.For me it doesn't matter who does what more, its who does it better is what I'm interested in. To be fair, Skyward Swords reviews have been higher than Skyrims bu every site that's reviewed both games, once again reviews don't always properly dictate what's better its all about personal taste.
That's the catch though. It doesn't. Aside from swordplay, what does it do better?but if Zelda does everything superior to Skyrim, why not buy Zelda.
Thanks.
I own a website, and I think Skyrim is better. Reviewers will mark Dynasty Warriors 8 at a 5.0 because it's the same game as last time, and yet will rank Call of Duty a 9.
You see what reviews are worth.
That's the catch though. It doesn't. Aside from swordplay, what does it do better?
I own a website, and I think Skyrim is better. Reviewers will mark Dynasty Warriors 8 at a 5.0 because it's the same game as last time, and yet will rank Call of Duty a 9.
You see what reviews are worth.
That's the catch though. It doesn't. Aside from swordplay, what does it do better?
I own a website, and I think Skyrim is better. Reviewers will mark Dynasty Warriors 8 at a 5.0 because it's the same game as last time, and yet will rank Call of Duty a 9.
You see what reviews are worth.
But Sly, in Dynasty Warriors all you do is press one or two buttons and kill a swarm of enemies to progress through linear stories based loosely on ancient Chinese history. As opposed to Call of Duty where all you do is press one or two buttons to kill a swarm of enemies to progress through linear stories that are loosely based on events of recent history. They're totally not the same thing.
On the other hand, you have Call of Duty. The Call of Duty formula in its current form first appeared four years ago with Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. It was revolutionary.