I got this idea from someone in the Dvd section. If this is in the wrong place please move it. WWE likes to put out best of sets as opposed to Anthologies. Wrestlemania, Summerslam, the Royal Rumble, and Survivor Series all have Anthology sets although they have not finished Survivor Series, and it looks like they might not. I for one like the complete anthology sets as we can relive each and every event instead of what WWE deems the best of. Some will argue it takes to much time and money on WWE's part to put out an Anthology especially with all the editing they have to do with entrance music, royalties paid, and to a lesser extent having to edit out everything Benoit related. I myself would pay more to have a more complete set of events, and lets face it if people are willing to pay I don't see why they wouldn't put the time needed into it. So what do you guys prefer. Anthologies or Best of sets?