I like the deal. It gives the Angels a DH or a third outfielder, and that's always a plus.
It's a plus to spend over $81 million (The Blue Jays paid $5M of his $86M remaining) over 4 years for a 3rd outfielder?!?!
And last year was the first time he did anything close to playing up to his contract (he still didn't play up to it, mind you). You don't pay 20 Million a year for newcomer decent all-around outfielder (which Wells is). You pay 20 Million annually for a perennial All-Star guy, or a guy that is of slightly less talent but who's importance to the franchise and fanbase is immeasurable and the team can afford to overpay (ie Jeter's current deal). Wells isn't either of that. Hence why I think the move is shit. Even the Yankees don't spend 20 Million annually on those types of players.
Wells can be a very good player, and although he's getting older you have to keep in mind he was facing ridiculously good competition in the AL East, so I don't see how you can't think he'll have somewhat of a good year.
1. Wells' numbers away from Rogers Centre this year? .227 Batting Average. .301 On Base. .407 Slugging. .708 OPS. He was only good this year when he was in the Rogers Center, and now he won't be there. But yes, it makes sense to think he'd be great in Los Angeles of Anaheim.
2. Toronto was one of the better hitting teams all year, so they obviously didn't have much trouble with the AL East pitching, which wasn't all that good to be honest (Yankees staff was down aside from CC, Sox staff wasn't good, Rays were pretty good especially Price). They led the league in Homers (40 more then the 2nd best team), 2nd in Doubles, 1st in Slugging, 1st in OPS, 2nd in Total Bases, 9th in Runs Scored and RBIs. Not a bad offense, I'd say.
Stormtrooper, a 32 year old Wells is a vastly better option than a 32 year old Rivera. Wells is a good fielder and a good hitter, whereas Rivera is fairly spotty. Anyway, Rivera started off TERRIBLE last year, and Wells looked great. They got All-Star and a Gold Glover in exchange for two role players, I don't see how that is bad.
Wells has played 576 more career games, which means a ton in terms of a guy wearing down. But yes, talent wise, it isn't the most terrible deal. Again, talent isn't the only thing to look at when making a trade of this magnitude. The next 3 years after 2011 are where they get killed, because you are overpaying for this guy when you could have kept Rivera, had an only slightly worse year out of him, then signed a top tier free agent in the following offseason with the $20 Million annually they now have locked up with Wells.
IF they talked to wells and have an agreement that Wells will opt-out of his contract after the season it's a pretty good deal. However, again, unless he has an MVP level season, he'd get less money on the open market, and likely wouldn't opt-out. And since an MVP caliber season isn't something you can fairly expect from Wells (who has never had such a season) they're likely stuck with him for 4 years at an exorbitant contract.