Why are you ignoring what the main eventers were getting paid when the area of interest was the midcard? Why should a company expect to grow in the mainstream with a focus not on the main event? Why do you think the rating would have stayed constant without any changes? Do you really expect me to believe Jeff Hardy isn't significantly outdrawing what Alex Shelley used to? Am I supposed to believe that Roode and Storm are making more than Nash and Booker T were?
You're operating under the false pretense that I view the TNA/IW of 3-4 years ago as some perfect sunflower where all the decisions were logical. What the main eventers were being paid back then is irrelevant, as I never made any claim that TNA/IW was spending their money wisely
there, either.
You're also raising the issue of the TNA/IW's move to a main event centered program,
which I never brought up as a positive or a negative. It's that "must defend TNA!!!" reflex of yours acting up again, because I never made a statement saying whether it was good or bad for the company; I made a statement saying that it hasn't paid off.
Yes, I expect you to believe that Jeff Hardy is drawing the same numbers as Alex Shelley was. This is 2012, not 2003. If you doubt me, we can go to the ratings thread that Slyfox keeps, and I can show you the numbers. People weren't showing up just for Alex Shelley; they were showing up for the X and Tag divisions. Turns out that mid-card oriented style was drawing just as much as Hardy v. Angle main events. (TNA/IW doesn't release PPV numbers because they suck. If they were selling product, like any company in the world, they'd be bragging about it. We have TV ratings, which are flat.)
If at some point I am supposed to believe Zema Ion would be doing better in WWE then that is funny. Zema would not be getting national exposure in WWE right now.
You're right. Zema Ion isn't a WWE caliber talent. He gets no one invested in him, and you will forget about him once he's off TV for a month straight. His "national exposure" amounts to him getting a couple hundred extra dollars when he's wrestling in high school gyms. I'm sure you don't like
that comparison, but Robbie E. is wrestling in a hundred-seat venue in my area this weekend. Tickets are $10. I don't think
he's going to get a big paycheck for that, and his star's a bit brighter than Zema Ion's, who's role is, again, the guy who lies underneath Austin Aries.
WWE crusierweights, on the other hand, don't take independent bookings, because they are far too busy making money to schedule independent dates. Tell me again how TNA/IW is such a sweet place to be a cruiserweight; Evan Bourne's star ain't so hot lately, but I haven't heard of him having to work indy bookings.
He did alright for himself but did he ever reach his supposed potential in WWE? No. Also, when did he main event the Royal Rumble?
Ugh. Are you seriously trying to imply that things didn't work out for John Morrison because he was never a multi-time world champion, and that he's a case of the WWE treating cruiserweights poorly? FUCK, man. I'll argue logic with you, but you're doing that reflexive response thing you do when you feel someone's threatening TNA/IW.
I was mistaken about him main eventing the Rumble- I was confusing a nearly hour-long stint he had in it with a world title match he had with Jeff Hardy on Smackdown. Doesn't change the argument any.
Shelley was a tag team champion in TNA and people bring up his name as someone that could help WWE. Why does this mean TNA doesn't use these guys but WWE does?
People say a lot of stupid shit on the internet. I don't defend everyone else's arguments, and have no idea why people keep coming to me with "but people on the internet say this, now defend it!"
Alex Shelley could do a lot better for
himself in the WWE. TNA/IW isn't making people famous, unless you're watching TNA/IW. Last I checked, TNA/IW wasn't putting people in movies, boxing main events, MTV (ok, they
did get people on "Family Feud"....), or anywhere else outside of the TNA/IW bubble. The ceiling in the WWE is just a little bit higher than the ceiling in TNA/IW.
Did they build CM Punk as a face? Does Shelley have anywhere near comparable mic skills to Punk? Daniel Bryan wasn't really built much. He was pretty much just put in the spot and practically every major jump in popularity he received was in spite of how WWE was trying to use him. He is also a good technical wrestler unlike Shelley and had a much larger fanbase backing than Shelley does. CM Punk counts but it was pretty drawn out and he is billed 4 inches taller than Shelley. I wouldn't really characterize either of those guys as working an X-division style though.
Yeah, I wouldn't characterize those guys as using an X-division style. Guess what? When you start main eventing, you change your style, as you are expected to work 20 minute matches more regularly, and cost the company much more money when you get hurt. You also tend to be older than the people who work the X-division style, have been wrestling for longer, and are thus slower and more prone to injury. Obvious statement is obvious.
Again; what does build have to do with
anything? Are you trying to imply, again, that Daniel Bryan would be better off in TNA/IW because the WWE didn't embrace him as a golden boy? You can achieve more in the WWE than you can in TNA/IW. End of story, bottom line. If anything, Daniel Bryan is the proof that a cruiserweight can succeed in the WWE
without a strong build from the company. Good news for Alex Shelley!
Unless you are AJ Styles, Daniels, Kaz, Jeff Hardy, RVD, Samoa Joe etc. if style is what you are looking for. Everyone starts somewhere and the company that just took a cruiserweight and actually built him up to higher than that is TNA with Austin Aries.
RVD and (laugh) Samoa Joe have never been considered "cruiserweights". Daniels and Kaz are nobodies that you are being told are somebodies; you will forget Kaz the moment he isn't on television. (Daniels at least has the Good Old Days to fall back on.) So, we're left with AJ Styles. I'll bet you real money he won't be in TNA/IW at the end of next year, because TNA/IW isn't doing anything with him now, and they have no intentions of doing anything with him besides using him to occupy space on the upper mid-card.
The rumor of a television program that we know nothing about on a network that may never even exist is some shaky ground to be standing on.
"It can't happen! It won't happen! I refuse to believe it! Lalalalala..."
I see you are unfamiliar with what a "soft sell" is, and thus I shall move on.
Remember that WWEs third programs have actually been getting worse ratings than TNA over recent times. This show may never exist and could conceivable be internet only for some time.
Fortunately, it's TNA/IW that pays by appearance. WWE stars are on salary with incentive bonuses, unless the have the leverage (a la Lesnar) to demand a contract with specific dates. I'll take money over being famous in Orlando.
If you aren't Austin Aries, once he moves on you could be the next Austin Aries, that is how.
Right. Who was the big X-division star right before Austin Aries again? You have the whole process backwards; the X-Division doesn't make the star. Austin Aries made himself with the talent he has. After he "moves on", the X-Division will resume being unimportant, because it will lack a charismatic performer to lead it.
Has that guy that was ROH champion like two years ago even made it out of FCW yet? TNA just put a guy from OVW on tv for a few weeks and seems to have given him a roster spot on a whim.
Yeah. Illustrate the difference between the two companies a little bit more, please. ROH champions need development before they're ready to work a WWE style; you can walk into TNA/IW and get a roster spot.
Braden Walker was a member of one of the biggest tag teams in TNA history. You might be asking, "who's Braden Walker?" Exactly. Just because you can be a star in the minor leagues doesn't mean that you deserve a spot in the big leagues.
There are still more opportunities for these guys trying to make a name in TNA. For more established guys it is debatable but both companies have done things with such guys. I just think TNA has shown more potential to actually build such guys.
TNA/IW is giving their mid-carders LOTS of opportunity. Robbie E. is getting the opportunity to wrestle in 100-seat theater houses. Jesse Neal had the opportunity to sign up for food stamps. I'm not aware that WWE performers get those opportunities. They have the opportunity of depositing a weekly check during their employment, rather than the "we'll pay you when we need you" deal TNA/IW works out with many of their lower-card performers.
If you seriously think that there is more potential available to people in TNA/IW than there is in the WWE, I don't know what to tell you. The days of the glass ceiling in the WWE are gone right now, when you have cruiserweights like Daniel Bryan and CM Punk main eventing, and that seems to be what your argument hinges on; that Alex Shelley is better off in TNA/IW, because the WWE would automatically hold him back (read: fail to push him to the moon.) That simply hasn't been true for the last few years; people who have talent have been getting their due in the WWE lately.