80's Region - #17 Billy Idol vs #48 Joy Division | WrestleZone Forums

80's Region - #17 Billy Idol vs #48 Joy Division

Billy Idol vs Joy Division

  • Billy Idol

  • Joy Division


Results are only viewable after voting.

IrishCanadian25

Going on 10 years with WrestleZone


2nd Round 80's Region Match

#17 Billy Idol vs #48 Joy Division

Please take into account the entire body of work of the artists, their mark on the music industry and/or society as a whole, their influence on other artists, lyrics, music, etc. If you have not already done so, please review the rules of the tournament and the Wrestlezone Forums. Have fun!

 
Un-fucking-believable as usual.

If you've never heard Joy Division, do not vote. I'm willing to bet that 99% of everyone who votes for Billy Idol will have never even heard Joy Division.

Joy Division invented the genre of post-punk and created two of the most influential and critically acclaimed albums of all time. There influence is absolutely immeasurable, the entire current indie rock scene that dominates the UK and most US rock scenes always cite Joy Division as one of their biggest influences. Franz Ferdinand? So very influenced by Joy Division it's downright ridiculious. The Killers? Ditto. The Strokes? Ditto. Arctic Monkeys? Ditto. Pretty much name a modern popular indie-rock band, and they were influenced by Joy Division. Ian Curtis was a lyrical genius and his voice is among the most recognizable and unique in rock history.

Utterly amazing band that needs to be paid due, right now. They were certainly 10,000 times better then Billy fucking Idol, who had all of maybe three or four good songs, and who was basically just an image. Fuck, Billy Idol himself would tell you that.

LISTEN. NOW.

Joy Division - Love Will Tear Us Apart
[youtube]K0dfd_L4tDk[/youtube]

Joy Division - Digital
[youtube]tRnWYALFPCw[/youtube]
 
I agree with xfear Joy division based purely on influence should win this. Every single half decent band to break on the British rock scene post 1990 were influenced by these guys. Not to mention that the music is fantastic and really stood out in the sea of music artisits in the 80's. Joy division are still immesnsly popular today. Billy Idol was ok but seriously Joy Division were amazing and were the real influence on modern British Indie rock despite what xfear or various shitty music critics claiming it was the smiths.
 
Disclaimer - I have not voted yet, and will not until I am clear as to whom I think is the better choice.

However, since X and the Capt. have both extolled why they feel Joy Division is the obvious choice, I want to go the Devil's Advocate route and explain why I may potentially go with Billy Idol.

For starters, looks at longevity. Joy Division was around for 4 years before Ian Curtis's death. Billy Idol has been going strong for 35 years now, and still tours.

Joy Division only released two studio albums, one of which was a posthumous release after Curtis's suicide. Idol released 8 original studio albums and 3 greatest hits albums.

As great of a song as "Love Will Tear Us Apart" is, that was technically Joy Division's only single. Billy Idol's singles reads like a Who's Who of 80's New Wave and Rock hits: Dancing with Myself, Mony Mony, White Wedding, Rebel Yell, Eyes Without a Face, Flesh for Fantasy, Sweet Sixteen, Cradle of Love, etc.

Joy Division were a staple of the start of the post-punk movement, I get that. Idol was part of the reason the MTV craze occured in the early 80's and was the vision of "Sexy Punk Rock" as Steve Stevens termed it.

Both bands were influenced largely by The Sex Pistols. Joy Division has been claimed as a major influence by bands such as U2 (Bono claims that U2 worships Joy Division) and John Frusciante. Billy Idol doesn't have the impressive influence that Joy Division can claim, I concede that point. Joy Division, however, doesn't even approach the actual success that Idol has had in music.

There, in a short, terse nutshell, is why Billy Idol is a worthy choice over Joy Division. I welcome rebuttles to convince me otherwise, as I am not 100% set on my vote yet.
 
As a personal choice I went with Billy Idol. But xfear is right. Joy Division are an amazing band and they do not get enough credit. Great song choices too by xfear on which one to let the masses hear at wz to listen to. But for me Billy Idol is legendary. He has personally been a favorite and I just couldnt vote against him.
 
Disclaimer - I have not voted yet, and will not until I am clear as to whom I think is the better choice.

However, since X and the Capt. have both extolled why they feel Joy Division is the obvious choice, I want to go the Devil's Advocate route and explain why I may potentially go with Billy Idol.

For starters, looks at longevity. Joy Division was around for 4 years before Ian Curtis's death. Billy Idol has been going strong for 35 years now, and still tours.

Longevity is a pretty ridiculious point to bring up when the lead singer of the band killed himself IC. That's just idiotic to compare. That's like comparing Nirvana to the Goo Goo Dolls and saying the Dolls are better because they've been around longer. Well no shit. But this isn't a "Who lived the longest?" competition, it's the "Who made the better music?" competition, which Joy Division easily beats Billy Idol in.

Joy Division only released two studio albums, one of which was a posthumous release after Curtis's suicide. Idol released 8 original studio albums and 3 greatest hits albums.

You say "posthumous release" as though it was just a bunch of B-sides and demo tapes strung together. That entire album was recorded before Ian killed himself.

And since we're apparently counting greatest hits albums, Joy Division has 4 greatest hits albums, one more then Billy Idol. Besides, again, this isn't "Who's made the most albums?", it's "Who's made the best music?".

Both of Joy Division's original studio albums are five-star classics of rock and roll and punk. It's up there with Nirvana and the Sex Pistols in terms of sheer influence on a generation of rock music.

Besides, how many of those Billy Idol albums were actually good? He had two good albums, both of which don't measure up to any of Joy Division's work. Not to mention Billy Idol released what I can quite positively say is the single worst rock record ever created in "Cyberpunk". I'm pretty sure it's renowned as the biggest critical and commercial flop in the history of rock music.


As great of a song as "Love Will Tear Us Apart" is, that was technically Joy Division's only single. Billy Idol's singles reads like a Who's Who of 80's New Wave and Rock hits: Dancing with Myself, Mony Mony, White Wedding, Rebel Yell, Eyes Without a Face, Flesh for Fantasy, Sweet Sixteen, Cradle of Love, etc.

First off, "Love Will Tear Us Apart" was Joy Division's third single, not their first. Second, again: Ian Curtis killed himself. Hard to release singles when your lead singer is dead. What's ironic though is that Joy Division released several posthumous singles in the later 80s that did very well on the British charts.

Everything you listed after Rebel Yell was crap in my opinion, but I won't take away from Billy Idol's popularity. He still isn't even half as influential as Joy Division. Name me one modern popular artist that you can say was clearly influenced by Billy Idol. Because I could name you dozens of current bands who were clearly influenced by Joy Division.

Joy Division were a staple of the start of the post-punk movement, I get that. Idol was part of the reason the MTV craze occured in the early 80's and was the vision of "Sexy Punk Rock" as Steve Stevens termed it.

Please, Michael Jackson was and is the artist that put MTV on the map. Trying to claim it was anyone else is foolish. No one's videos were requested more then Michael's. And considering that Joy Division had already ended before MTV was created, that's a rather foolish thing to compare them with.

Both bands were influenced largely by The Sex Pistols. Joy Division has been claimed as a major influence by bands such as U2 (Bono claims that U2 worships Joy Division) and John Frusciante. Billy Idol doesn't have the impressive influence that Joy Division can claim, I concede that point. Joy Division, however, doesn't even approach the actual success that Idol has had in music.

There, in a short, terse nutshell, is why Billy Idol is a worthy choice over Joy Division. I welcome rebuttles to convince me otherwise, as I am not 100% set on my vote yet.

As always I find myself stating this: How again does popularity equal quality? Why aren't Britney Spears, NSync, and the Backstreet Boys in this contest? Since we're judging the quality of music on record sales, I guess the Backstreet Boys are a way better band then the Allman Brothers or Cream or Van Halen right? I mean, they've sold a lot more records.

Joy Division > Billy Idol. All night long in the words of Lionel Richie.
 
I am actually thrilled with this thread, for two reasons.

1. Xfear and I returned to form with our debates, essentially falling on opposite ends of the rock spectrum, and

2. The score ended in a tie, advancing both bands, without my having to vote in a match I was truly torn on.

To respond to X, however, I feel longevity is absolutely one of the criterion by which a bands place in the pantheon on all-time greatness can be measured. It shows dedication, focus, commitment, and consistency. Longevity in this case is far from ridiculous, X. The lead singer killed himself, and I am supposed to disqualify that glaring fact as irrelevant!? I hold suicidal bandmates against a lot of bands, X. Even bands I practically worship like Alice in Chains and Sublime are hurt because they couldn't last long enough to make more than 3-5 studio albums!

And to try to parallel by point to saying that the Goo Goo Dolls are better than Nirvana? THAT is ridiculous, and it is twisting my words. Longevity is ONE criterion, not the ONLY criterion. But it is an important one.

Definition - Posthumous Release. Noun. A Release after death. That's all I was saying. Nothing more, nothing less.

Ok, so Joy Division had 4 Greatest Hits off of 3 studio albums? That's just plain silly. How many times can you string together the same songs and maybe some live versions and B sides to make more Greatest Hits than Studio Albums. It's almost mathematically impossible. I don't know what tracks were on JD's 3 Greatest Hits albums, but I assume there had to be some overlaps. Only a few bands have had 3 LEGITIMATE Greatest Hits albums, among them Elton John, Billy Joel, Queen, Zeppelin, Elvis, The Beatles, few others.

Besides, how many of those Billy Idol albums were actually good? He had two good albums, both of which don't measure up to any of Joy Division's work. Not to mention Billy Idol released what I can quite positively say is the single worst rock record ever created in "Cyberpunk". I'm pretty sure it's renowned as the biggest critical and commercial flop in the history of rock music.

This statement actually reeks of absolute truth. I will not even attempt to refute any of it, because I agree 100% with this statement.

Everything you listed after Rebel Yell was crap in my opinion, but I won't take away from Billy Idol's popularity. He still isn't even half as influential as Joy Division. Name me one modern popular artist that you can say was clearly influenced by Billy Idol. Because I could name you dozens of current bands who were clearly influenced by Joy Division.

Once again...

This statement actually reeks of absolute truth. I will not even attempt to refute any of it, because I agree 100% with this statement.

I remain torn on tis match up. Billy Idol gets a point for longevity, JD for influence. Idol for # of hits and albums, JD for total quality of each album.

This one many be a push for me even still. These two will face Michael Jackson in the next round in a Triple Threat match. All 3 bands have a shot at advancing.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top