1. This is a two-parter
a) Get rid of TLC, Hell In A Cell, and Money In The Bank as pay-per-views - I agree with someone above who said that they should be special attractions based on a feud. This way, other PPVs can feature these big attractions and the PPV slots that are replaced can have a better variety of matches (or just a less gimmicky atmosphere).
b) Bring back King of the Ring in June, but don't reward the winner with a silly gimmick of a crown, staff, and cape, but with a World Title shot at Summerslam. The Royal Rumble Winner gets a shot at Wrestlemania, the MITB gets a year, why not give another opportunity to build another credible superstar and a watchable feud over the summer.
2. Keep valet level Divas as valets. Once they've built enough skills at NXT, then let them get in the ring. Just because there's a battle royal, doesn't mean we need all 25 employed Divas. They make it sloppy. Just because they're on Total Divas, doesn't mean we can stomach seeing them in the ring at a lower caliber. I know they work hard and it's demanding, but there should be better supervision of wrestling capability in relation to TV time. Cameron, Eva Marie, Summer Rae, Emma, Rosa Mendes rarely hold a competent match. Rosa, in my opinion, has no business being there. Apart from allegedly dating MICHAEL HAYES for a stint and now on Total Divas, I can't think of reasons she has the gig still. There are plenty who aren't that good (Bellas, Naomi, Alicia, Tamina) but still can string moves together for a 3 minute TV spot. It seems Natalya is underutilized, Layla is nearly invisible (maybe WWE is agist?), and AJ Lee/Paige are the only two considered 'good' they want to use consistently on RAW at least. A way to build the strength of matches would be to USE the divas with the most ability and give them proper length matches. Is 7+ minutes on each show truly too much to give to Divas? There are nearly 10 Divas who can be utilized, but for some reason there is far too little time and it's often given to women who can't handle it yet, while a handful just hope a Battle Royal or costume contest come around soon.
3. Instead of sub-par segments and time fillers (recaps, commentary opinions, contests, guest hosts), fill them with matches. I don't say abolish them, but cut them back. Our of a 3 hour show, often only 1 hour is in ring action. Instead of awkward, poorly acted trash talk to get me interested in a feud, why not showcase skills of superstars/Divas who haven't been seen lately. Maybe a new babyface/heel could be built if they had TV exposure, which could encourage merch sales, future TV ratings, and social media followings for those wrestlers.
a) Get rid of TLC, Hell In A Cell, and Money In The Bank as pay-per-views - I agree with someone above who said that they should be special attractions based on a feud. This way, other PPVs can feature these big attractions and the PPV slots that are replaced can have a better variety of matches (or just a less gimmicky atmosphere).
b) Bring back King of the Ring in June, but don't reward the winner with a silly gimmick of a crown, staff, and cape, but with a World Title shot at Summerslam. The Royal Rumble Winner gets a shot at Wrestlemania, the MITB gets a year, why not give another opportunity to build another credible superstar and a watchable feud over the summer.
2. Keep valet level Divas as valets. Once they've built enough skills at NXT, then let them get in the ring. Just because there's a battle royal, doesn't mean we need all 25 employed Divas. They make it sloppy. Just because they're on Total Divas, doesn't mean we can stomach seeing them in the ring at a lower caliber. I know they work hard and it's demanding, but there should be better supervision of wrestling capability in relation to TV time. Cameron, Eva Marie, Summer Rae, Emma, Rosa Mendes rarely hold a competent match. Rosa, in my opinion, has no business being there. Apart from allegedly dating MICHAEL HAYES for a stint and now on Total Divas, I can't think of reasons she has the gig still. There are plenty who aren't that good (Bellas, Naomi, Alicia, Tamina) but still can string moves together for a 3 minute TV spot. It seems Natalya is underutilized, Layla is nearly invisible (maybe WWE is agist?), and AJ Lee/Paige are the only two considered 'good' they want to use consistently on RAW at least. A way to build the strength of matches would be to USE the divas with the most ability and give them proper length matches. Is 7+ minutes on each show truly too much to give to Divas? There are nearly 10 Divas who can be utilized, but for some reason there is far too little time and it's often given to women who can't handle it yet, while a handful just hope a Battle Royal or costume contest come around soon.
3. Instead of sub-par segments and time fillers (recaps, commentary opinions, contests, guest hosts), fill them with matches. I don't say abolish them, but cut them back. Our of a 3 hour show, often only 1 hour is in ring action. Instead of awkward, poorly acted trash talk to get me interested in a feud, why not showcase skills of superstars/Divas who haven't been seen lately. Maybe a new babyface/heel could be built if they had TV exposure, which could encourage merch sales, future TV ratings, and social media followings for those wrestlers.