Basic Thuganomics!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
1. Nope. He played his character to perfection last season.
2. Irrelevant! He's been getting TV time and wins. You can't quantify your claim that none of the pros have been getting wins by claiming Superstars means shit.
Just because you didn't like the gimmick doesn't mean he couldn't play it.No. He plays Rat Boy. This fails in every definition of the word.
Just because you didn't like the gimmick doesn't mean he couldn't play it.
No, it was stupid. There was nothing to it at all. Dude he had rat poison given to him and he was obsessed with cheese. That's bad by bad indy standards.
Again, you're confusing a bad gimmick with a bad wrestler.
I don't think they explained it. They said no immunity, so it might be that the person with the most amount of Redemption points at the end wins.Redemption Points are more or less Immunity Points aren't they?
He's essentially a less talented replica of Lucky Cannon with blonde hair and a big nose.So Wade Barrett gets exiled from Nexus and goes on to lead a successful SmackDown stable. Darren Young gets exiled from Nexus and goes back to NXT. Okay.
Good for WWE. They've been watching their Survivor: Redemption Island. Actually, no: They've tweaked the game in no meaningful way.
Interesting to see the guys the WWE really want to do something with. And Connor O'Brien. Not that there's any proof that the WWE doesn't want to do anything with him. But there's no reason he didn't win last season. As such I'm still bitter. Though not as bitter as I'd be if I ever saw Eli Cottonwood again.
Finally, I will say that I'm not as down on Novak as everyone else. Then again, I only watched last season to skip to the O'Brien stuff. Anything in particular that makes Novak stand out as worthless?