1.) Would you sign Sting to Wwe?
I'm still going with a no. I know some people are still dying to see the dream match between Sting and Undertaker at Wrestlemania, but considering his age, I don't see what you could possibly do with him after that. He's not going to work anything near a full-time schedule, and as far as potential Wrestlemania opponents for Taker goes, you still have John Cena and Brock Lesnar on the roster. For my money, both matches are FAR more interesting than Taker VS Sting. Besides, Sting is famous for being a legend, who never worked for the McMahons, so you're taking away his biggest claim to fame if he steps foot in WWE.
You're an idiot, if you don't want Cena. He's proven himself as the face of his generation, he can carry a wrestling company on his back, Cena's had countless great matches, and he's a cash cow. Plain and simple, not wanting Cena would be a stupid business move.
Tricky,
tricky pick. Morgan has a great look and size, and he has an aura as the athletic giant. But TNA gave him countless chances, and he was never able to capitalize on any of them. I know most people will point towards TNA screwing Morgan out of chances to break through the glass ceiling, but you have to accept the fact Matt Morgan isn't that good, and Morgan never gave TNA any reasons to continue his big pushes. I can't remember a truly great match from Morgan, or a Morgan promo that blew me away. Add in the fact he's creeping towards forty, and I would say no.
As time passes, I think it's becoming more obvious Zack Ryder was just a fad. Some might point to the love/Rise Above Hate storyline between Kane, Cena, Eve, and Ryder as his downfall, because WWE seemingly went out of their way to make Ryder look like a bitch. But you can't cling to one failed storyline as an excuse. And he's only going to go so far with this look. Sure the smarky Jersey, New York, or Philly crowds will pop for him every now and then, but WWE has obviously given up on Ryder, because his role has been reduced to jobber bait. So yeah, I'd release him.
A definite yes. Tara's up there in age, but she's still in great shape, and more than capable of putting over the younger Divas on the roster. Investing time and energy into WWE's women division is a crapshoot, but Tara gives you the best chances for some success.
Madison Rayne is still young and in her prime, so I'd sign her. She's got the looks, and although it's a tired and played out character, Madison is a convincing mean and narcissistic bitch.
Sign, easily. Morrison is someone, who never got a fair deal in my eyes. Morrison and Sheamus had some great matches together, and Morrison did have a good amount of momentum, when he faced Miz for the WWE Championship on the New Year's night episode of Raw a few years back.
And I don't know how true the rumors are, but I remember these stories floating around about Vince refusing to put the WWE Championship on Morrison, because, well Vince thought he was a pussy for not standing up for himself. These criticisms came from the real life Morrison/Melina relationship, and Morrison letting Melina walk all over him, but from what I remember, Morrison and Melina had one of those "open relationships."
Still, I'd bring Morrison back for another run. But he would need a new character. The futuristic and flamboyant playboy act was beyond stale, and I think this character hurt Morrison towards the end.
It's a no, and I don't have to think twice about it. MVP always bored the shit out of me. Sure, he was more entertaining as a heel, but MVP is another one of those guys, who received strong pushes, and wasn't able to do anything with them. He was put into feuds and storylines with Taker and Triple H, and he fizzled out each time. I know some people enjoyed his "I'm better than you!" feud with Matt Hardy from a few years back, but it's kind of sad, when your highlight for success in WWE is a barley above average feud with Matt Hardy of all people.
Nope. As a kid I couldn't stand D-Lo Brown, and I still feel the same way today. I'm sorry, but I can't think of one single redeemable quality from D-Lo Brown. He's just another guy, who was fortunate enough to be on the roster during the Attitude Era, so putting D-Lo Brown on your roster would be a waste of space.
York probably had the brightest upside out of all the Gut Check competitors. But York "standing out" amongst the other Gut Check competitors is like an upgrade from McDonald's to Applebee's or Chili's. It's not a big difference, and in the grand scheme of things, York's presence didn't mean much, so I'd say no.
Hell no. Kozlov was a boring and one-dimensional anti-American heel. WWE REALLY tried to play up his winning streak, but it never picked up any real momentum. Kozlov had a slight resurrection, when WWE paired him up with Santino as a comedy character, forming an odd couple that brought a few laughs out of me. But Kozlov isn't worth the time or money, and you knew his career in WWE was on life support, when WWE put him on the ECW brand with the draft one year.
Another no. I'll admit, I enjoyed Masters as this goofy meathead more often than not, but when you strip Masters down to the core, he was just a look, and that's it. Masters was
okay during his feud and partnership with Carlito, but guys with Masters size and chiseled bodybuilder physique are a dime a dozen, so he wouldn't be worth the trouble.
Ryback Shell-Shocking The Great Khali is reason enough for me to keep him around. Khali has the jaw-dropping look as a giant, and you can always use him for the awe-inspiring sight for an incredible feat of strength. Plus, like him or not, Khali still gets some nice responses from live crowds. And if there's no one else, Khali could be interested into the WHC as a contender, or a chaser.
Big Daddy V is an unquestionable no in my eyes. I laughed my ass of during the Big Daddy V run, when WWE went out of their way to present him as a serious threat, as the monster heel. Sorry, but I had a hard time buying into Big Daddy V as a dangerous threat, because he was too fat. The last thing I remember from Big Daddy V was his atrocious feud with CM Punk for the WWEECW Championship, and the waste of time match (it lasted about two minutes, and ended in a DQ) at No Mercy 2007.
Crimson is a yes for me. TNA really didn't give him time to grow and come into his own. Right off the bat, they tried to make a big deal out of him with a winning streak nobody cared about. When that fizzled out, they turned him heel, and his heel run was a failure. But there's a lot of untapped potential in Crimson, and he's young, so I wouldn't hesitate to sign him.
