Spidey Revivey
Porn is okay here long as it ain't dudes.
You hear many here talking about how much they enjoyed the Golden Years of wrestling, back when WWF(E) really started to make waves in the entertainment industry with the likes of Hulk Hogan, "Macho Man" Randy Savage, and Rowdy Roddy Piper.
You may also be aware (especially with it fresh on many fan's minds) of that moment in history dubbed "The Attitude Era". It has seriously gained critical acclaim here on WZ because of the comparison to the more modern aspect of WWE- The PG Era. We saw the anti-heroes instead of the babyfaces becoming the popular ones. The Rock, Stone Cold, Sting, and Goldberg were extremely over with fans at this time. Also the product was much more different than the Golden Years with edgier storylines and blood practically being the norm.
What about the time BETWEEN The Attitude Era and The PG Era?
Within the years of 2002-2008 WWE ended the One Roster Two shows and built up two seperate rosters for each individual show. We know them to be Raw and Smackdown with their own Heavyweight Championships. WCW was gone for good and left many stars willing to join the 'E ranks. Out of the woodwork, guys like Rey Mysterio, Eddie Guerrero, Chris Benoit, and Brock Lesnar were becoming household names, while mid-carders like John Cena, Randy Orton, and Batista were trying to make a name for themselves.
So the question is this- prior to me explaining a little of what transpired pre-PG post-Attitude Era, do you feel the "Ruthless Aggression Era" ("Ruthless Aggression" was a term Vince McMahon coined at this time) Should be considered an actual era of wrestling? I ask because I don't see that many people discussing this time and billing it as such. That, and it was nowhere near as popular as the AE or the PG Era, let alone the Golden Years.
And should "Ruthless Aggression" deserve such rep as that of the other 3 timelines in the WWE? I mean lots of people like to compare the PG Era to the Attitude Era..but what about that time before PG?
You may also be aware (especially with it fresh on many fan's minds) of that moment in history dubbed "The Attitude Era". It has seriously gained critical acclaim here on WZ because of the comparison to the more modern aspect of WWE- The PG Era. We saw the anti-heroes instead of the babyfaces becoming the popular ones. The Rock, Stone Cold, Sting, and Goldberg were extremely over with fans at this time. Also the product was much more different than the Golden Years with edgier storylines and blood practically being the norm.
What about the time BETWEEN The Attitude Era and The PG Era?
Within the years of 2002-2008 WWE ended the One Roster Two shows and built up two seperate rosters for each individual show. We know them to be Raw and Smackdown with their own Heavyweight Championships. WCW was gone for good and left many stars willing to join the 'E ranks. Out of the woodwork, guys like Rey Mysterio, Eddie Guerrero, Chris Benoit, and Brock Lesnar were becoming household names, while mid-carders like John Cena, Randy Orton, and Batista were trying to make a name for themselves.
So the question is this- prior to me explaining a little of what transpired pre-PG post-Attitude Era, do you feel the "Ruthless Aggression Era" ("Ruthless Aggression" was a term Vince McMahon coined at this time) Should be considered an actual era of wrestling? I ask because I don't see that many people discussing this time and billing it as such. That, and it was nowhere near as popular as the AE or the PG Era, let alone the Golden Years.
And should "Ruthless Aggression" deserve such rep as that of the other 3 timelines in the WWE? I mean lots of people like to compare the PG Era to the Attitude Era..but what about that time before PG?