Exactly. Too many variables and what if's that poke holes in the prosecutions case. Poke holes like the clearly open and used package with the blood vial. That whole thing was a trip.
All in all, not enough solid evidence against for a conviction. The defense did a bang up job & I am not a detective or trained in forensics, but if I was on the jury there wasnt enough that could get me to say Avery was guilty. Could he be? Yeah, but there are other scenarios that could have played out just as likely. Interesting case for sure & a damn shame the prosecutor/cops pushed so hard to the public he was completely guilty before the defense could show reasons why he may not be. That town seemed to go from one side to the other fairly quick and decisively before hearing the whole story.
All in all, not enough solid evidence against for a conviction. The defense did a bang up job & I am not a detective or trained in forensics, but if I was on the jury there wasnt enough that could get me to say Avery was guilty. Could he be? Yeah, but there are other scenarios that could have played out just as likely. Interesting case for sure & a damn shame the prosecutor/cops pushed so hard to the public he was completely guilty before the defense could show reasons why he may not be. That town seemed to go from one side to the other fairly quick and decisively before hearing the whole story.