You know, when he first turned on the Shield I thought, why him. When he won money in the bank I thought, why him. When he won the WWE World Heavyweight Championship I thought, why him. Well, now I can actually answer that question; he's pretty damn good. Of course, I'm talking about Seth Rollins.
A lot of us all thought the same way when the Shield was still together. We thought that it was going to be Dean Ambrose to be the first to break out and become the guy of the Shield. It wasn't Dean Ambrose though, it was Seth Rollins. Then, even after Rollins had won the money in the bank, we thought that it was going to be Roman Reigns to be the first to win the title at Wrestlemania 31. Again, however, it was Seth Rollins that done that. I have to be honest, for awhile I didn't get Seth Rollins. I didn't understand why the WWE insisted on this guy becoming the man. I mean, Ambrose was by far the most entertaining member of the Shield and Reigns has that super hero big guy quality that WWE loves. So I constantly asked myself, as I said before, why Rollins. Finally, I have an answer. He's actually pretty damn good. Honestly, for the last few months, he's been consistently the most entertaining part of Raw, IMO (along with the New Day). Then, tonight, on what was a star studded Raw with Austin, 'Taker, Lesnar, HBK, and Flair appearing, Rollins was, IMO, the most entertaining part of the show. He's awesome in the ring and he gets better and better on the mic every time we see him. I mean, his interactions with HBK and HHH, along with his impromptu reunion with the Shield were the best parts of Raw tonight. So, again, I have to admit it; he's actually pretty damn good.
What do you guys think? Is Rollins good or am I by myself in my line of thinking?
A lot of us all thought the same way when the Shield was still together. We thought that it was going to be Dean Ambrose to be the first to break out and become the guy of the Shield. It wasn't Dean Ambrose though, it was Seth Rollins. Then, even after Rollins had won the money in the bank, we thought that it was going to be Roman Reigns to be the first to win the title at Wrestlemania 31. Again, however, it was Seth Rollins that done that. I have to be honest, for awhile I didn't get Seth Rollins. I didn't understand why the WWE insisted on this guy becoming the man. I mean, Ambrose was by far the most entertaining member of the Shield and Reigns has that super hero big guy quality that WWE loves. So I constantly asked myself, as I said before, why Rollins. Finally, I have an answer. He's actually pretty damn good. Honestly, for the last few months, he's been consistently the most entertaining part of Raw, IMO (along with the New Day). Then, tonight, on what was a star studded Raw with Austin, 'Taker, Lesnar, HBK, and Flair appearing, Rollins was, IMO, the most entertaining part of the show. He's awesome in the ring and he gets better and better on the mic every time we see him. I mean, his interactions with HBK and HHH, along with his impromptu reunion with the Shield were the best parts of Raw tonight. So, again, I have to admit it; he's actually pretty damn good.
What do you guys think? Is Rollins good or am I by myself in my line of thinking?