WWE: The New Generation..... Um.... Newer....

Tenta

The Shark Should've Worked in WCW
I've been reading Klunder's recent reviews of all of the IYH pay-per-views (which, you should go see if you get the chance), and I began to think.

Sure, the matches weren't that great.

Sure, ratings were down (though they are pretty much in the toilet now).

But damn, there were some pretty entertaining characters. And not just for the main eventers, even the lower card wrestlers had a distinguishing gimmick that made them so memorable. Hell, even the lowest of jobbers, such as Duke Droese, were given a gimmick to work with.

My question is this: With the ratings in the toilet, would it hurt any bit to develop characters with stronger, perhaps stranger gimmicks? It has already been asked here if a Doink would work in today's WWE. Why not include many characters from which the wrestler can work with.

I'll give a perfect example... Charlie Haas. The man simply has no gimmick. Like, at all. Would it hurt to give him an outrageous, perhaps goofy gimmick? He doesn't have to be a garbage man, but perhaps a little something more outlandish? After all, the WWE is trying to rope in kids. Kids don't care about relating to the wrestlers. Hell, the more outrageous for them, the better. We may not like it very much, but perhaps it will grab at the demographic the WWE has made it apparent it's going after.

Your thoughts?
 
I don't really know if he should have a gimmick too out there. He suits himself if you know what I mean. A great wrestler, he can be like Triple H, no specific gimmick, just be a great wrestler and give his best when he's out there.
 
I agree. Many wrestlers currently going up to the main event don't really have much in terms of gimmicks.
We've got CM Punk. Ok, he's straight edge.... that's it?
John Morrison. He's got the "Shaman of Sexy" thing going on, but apart from wearing a fur coat down to the ring, he doesn't really act it out very much.
Kofi kingston. Well, he's Jamaican. I've never got the whole 'From a country' gimmick. Since when is simply being from somewhere a gimmick?
There's the Legacy. They're supposed to be cocky, brash and in your face. But instead they're constantly nervous and constantly getting squashed.

While I was never much into the whole gimmick aspect of pro wrestling, I must admit that we're currently at an all time dry spell for genuinely entertaining gimmicks.
And I find it ironic that in the 'PG era', the time where the WWE is supposedly trying to get 5-15 year old viewers, they're not putting out any cartoonish characters. Characters that are larger than life and truly come from the imagination. Even Santino, the biggest comedy character in the WWE, is still more appreciated by older viewers.
 
The New Generation was truly the Era of gimmicks. Today's Era couldn't be more polar opposite.

I have no issue with the use of gimmicks, as long as the is a fluctuation of gimmicks, and as long as the gimmicks truly give character to the performer.

But all pretty much all of today's superstars have absolutely no gimmick at all, and I think that is the big reason why people feel the characters are absolutely stale.

This is just a list a partial list of talent that all have a "No Gimmick Needed" character:


John Cena
Triple H
Randy Orton
Batista
Cody Rhodes
Ted Dibiase
Christian
Chavo Guerrero
Charlie Haas
Shelton Benjamin
Mike Knox
Jamie Noble
Paul Burchill


Along with there being entirely too much wrestling on TV each week (the number of shows, and the actual lengths those matches run on those shows) ... I feel this is the second biggest factor in why the interest has died down in wrestling. The characters absolutely suck.
 
I don't think the lack of gimmicks is the problem. I blame it more on the lack of mic time. Back in the day even jobbers would given the chance to talk for a minute backstage. Now? Unless you're a maineventer all you get to do is stand around and watch other angles take place.

Silly gimmicks won't work anymore in today's wrestling world. I don't think it matters who the company is marketed towards. But everyone should be given a chance to talk.

It's quite simple. If you don't speak and the announcers just tell me that I'm supposed to like you as a wrestler it's probably not going to happen. Show me why I should give a crap about you. Gimmicks can only go so far.

I think the smartest thing the WWE could do now is look at every in ring promo with an important guy that they have planned. Figure out how much time is scheduled for it and cut that time in half. Then take that extra time you have and schedule backstage promos/skits that involve the guys who aren't on the card in a wrestling capacity. It's better to give everyone a little exposure than to only give a few guys tons of exposure.
 
This is just a list a partial list of talent that all have a "No Gimmick Needed" character:


John Cena
Triple H
Randy Orton
Batista
Cody Rhodes
Ted Dibiase
Christian
Chavo Guerrero
Charlie Haas
Shelton Benjamin
Mike Knox
Jamie Noble
Paul Burchill

Yes some of those do not have gimmicks, but I know a few of those do. Shelton - gold standard. Burchill - incest gimmick.Randy Orton - i cant name what the gimmick is but he definitely has one.

Yes the gimmicks are garbage but they are out there.
 
Yes some of those do not have gimmicks, but I know a few of those do. Shelton - gold standard. Burchill - incest gimmick.Randy Orton - i cant name what the gimmick is but he definitely has one.

Yes the gimmicks are garbage but they are out there.

"Gold Standard" is a nickname, not a gimmick. And when did Paul Burchill have an incest gimmick??? I've never seen any inkling of that.

The WWE desperately needs characters but I've come to realize it's not going to happen. Whenever they actually do debut someone with a gimmick, they get a short push then either release them or job them out. The Boogeyman was one of the most "over" guys in the company but he had a gimmick and the current WWE writers can't handle it so they released him. Kizarny had months of promos but after 2 matches got released.

The fact of the matter is, the WWE writers suck and putting actual characters into storylines is too difficult for them. They can create a character and make vignettes for him before he debuts but after that, they have no clue what to do.
 
And when did Paul Burchill have an incest gimmick??? I've never seen any inkling of that.

It was subtly hinted at when he made his debut on Raw a while back with his sister Katie Lea talking about whatever my brother wants he gets and her rubbing her hands all over him like a british ****e...

Anyways off the subject,
The problem with gimmicks is yeah there funny, but it makes wrestling now look kinda stupid, look at TNA and curry man or the prince albert justice league, this is what the early 90's represented and after the attitude era came and gone the gimmick era just doesn't work in today's wrestling. Don't get me wrong I don't think Duke the dumpster was a bad gimmick or Henry Godwin being a pig farmer wasn't a fun character idea, but the gimmick has to be something believable now I believed Duke, I believed Henry Godwin, hell I even believed in the Brooklyn Brawler. The fact of the matter is if your gonna have any gimmick now it has to be something believable like the world strongest man because its true, Val Venis as a pornstar because you made it look right, Goldust because well Goldust is really strange.

So give me blue bloods, give me pirates (I won't lie Paul birchill as a pirate was great cause his moves were exciting), give me farmers, store clerks, fighters. But make the gimmick feel real and not another goon, tugboat, gobbledy gooker, Beserker, etc.
 
But damn, there were some pretty entertaining characters. And not just for the main eventers, even the lower card wrestlers had a distinguishing gimmick that made them so memorable. Hell, even the lowest of jobbers, such as Duke Droese, were given a gimmick to work with. My question is this: With the ratings in the toilet, would it hurt any bit to develop characters with stronger, perhaps stranger gimmicks? It has already been asked here if a Doink would work in today's WWE. Why not include many characters from which the wrestler can work with.


Okay i understand where you're coming from in saying wrestler's need to learn to embrace they're gimmicks. But I think going back to the days of gimmicks like The garbage man (drosee), the hockey player (the goon), the pig farmer (henry and finneus godwin), The Voodoo priest (papa shango), The escaped convict (nails), The Dentist (Issac yankem DDS), The teacher (Dean Douglas) and the The Plumber (his name escapes m at the moment) are something I barely tolerated at the age of 12. It's not an era I care to re-visit.
Those types of gimmicks are left behind from a different era of wrestling, one that was probably erased forever by the "attitude era".


After the attitude era (or rather after ECW inspired the attitude era), wrestling's perception changed and while it is no longer the attitude era, there is an element that remains from it. And that is the fans intolerance of unrealistic characters (excluding the Undertaker of course lol). Vince has tried to bring some vestige of those gimmicks back at one point or another, in the forms of guys like the boogeyman and Kizarny and Planet stasiak (obscure I know). and while these guys didn't light the world on fire with they're talents, it didn't really matter anyhow because the fans simply didn't buy into them. Hell the Boogeyman was given WAY too many chances and still never really broke through to anything more than a repellant reaction after he would stuff worms into his mouth.


I think our bigger problem here is the lack of effort a lot of these guys (and creative as well) put into they're characters. It's not that a lot of guys have no gimmick, it's that the gimmicks today are more subversive and subdued. Creative has the right idea, but they need to learn how to follow through and not to quit developing the characters after they have been presented to us.



I'll give a perfect example... Charlie Haas. The man simply has no gimmick. Like, at all. Would it hurt to give him an outrageous, perhaps goofy gimmick? He doesn't have to be a garbage man, but perhaps a little something more outlandish? After all, the WWE is trying to rope in kids. Kids don't care about relating to the wrestlers. Hell, the more outrageous for them, the better. We may not like it very much, but perhaps it will grab at the demographic the WWE has made it apparent it's going after.


Has just got through a pretty cheesed up gimmick run. Have we forgotten the impersonator gimmick so quickly already? it may have been a lame gimmick, but it got laughs at least, for the most part.



Kofi kingston. Well, he's Jamaican. I've never got the whole 'From a country' gimmick. Since when is simply being from somewhere a gimmick?


I think this is a classic case of the ridiculous American thought process. we think non american people are set to act a certain way the moment we learn of whatever country they are from. American Wrestling has always lightly paralelled the thoughts and views of the average american mind. I believe that would be the reasoning. Troubling, isnt it?

There's the Legacy. They're supposed to be cocky, brash and in your face. But instead they're constantly nervous and constantly getting squashed.


Yeah, Ted and Cody are nothing more than lackeys for orton to use as a means of prevailing. I'm surprised whenever they even let one of those two talk for longer than ten seconds.



This is just a list a partial list of talent that all have a "No Gimmick Needed" character:


John Cena
Triple H
Randy Orton
Batista
Cody Rhodes
Ted Dibiase
Christian
Chavo Guerrero
Charlie Haas
Shelton Benjamin
Mike Knox
Jamie Noble
Paul Burchill

Here's where I think these aforementioned creative issues come into play. most of these guys have gimmicks, they just don't have enough effort put forth for people to remember that they do. Even Cena's gimmick is ignored these days.


Cena= White Rapper
Triple H= Master of mental warfare.
Randy orton= was the legend killer, now he's just carazay! lol
Batista= He's suppose to be a wrestling plauge (j/k I got nada here)
Cody Rhodes= He's supposed to have his daddy's charisma , watching him talk, thats gotta be fabricated by creative lol.
Ted Dibiase= :lol:
Christian= Is the rock's understudy, the Creepy little bastard.
Chavo= well, he's ummm....mexican. the wwe tends to make that a gimmick.
Haas= already mentioned him, but now i guess he's shelton's white guy friend.
Benjamin= The gold standard in technical wrestling (and I still buy it dammit)
Knox= His beard is his gimmick lol. That and he's a "schoolyard bully" type
Jamie noble= Is invisible.
Burchill= was a pirate, now he just has a sister.

Along with there being entirely too much wrestling on TV each week (the number of shows, and the actual lengths those matches run on those shows) ... I feel this is the second biggest factor in why the interest has died down in wrestling. The characters absolutely suck.


i never thought i'd hear someone complain about there being too much wrestling on the average WWE show. I feel the complete opposite way about that, tell the stories in the ring, quit putting the mics in the hands of people who can't tell they're story with it and let them do what they do best. You'd be surprised how much a characters can be developed in the ring as opposed to simply making them talk.
 
I've been reading Klunder's recent reviews of all of the IYH pay-per-views (which, you should go see if you get the chance), and I began to think.

Sure, the matches weren't that great.

Sure, ratings were down (though they are pretty much in the toilet now).

But damn, there were some pretty entertaining characters. And not just for the main eventers, even the lower card wrestlers had a distinguishing gimmick that made them so memorable. Hell, even the lowest of jobbers, such as Duke Droese, were given a gimmick to work with.

My question is this: With the ratings in the toilet, would it hurt any bit to develop characters with stronger, perhaps stranger gimmicks? It has already been asked here if a Doink would work in today's WWE. Why not include many characters from which the wrestler can work with.

I'll give a perfect example... Charlie Haas. The man simply has no gimmick. Like, at all. Would it hurt to give him an outrageous, perhaps goofy gimmick? He doesn't have to be a garbage man, but perhaps a little something more outlandish? After all, the WWE is trying to rope in kids. Kids don't care about relating to the wrestlers. Hell, the more outrageous for them, the better. We may not like it very much, but perhaps it will grab at the demographic the WWE has made it apparent it's going after.

Your thoughts?

Today's cast of WWE superstars reminds me of who Hogan worked with during his run with the WWF in the 80s and 90s. What kind of characters did they have back in the day? Just like the ones we have now.

Andre the Giant, Mr. Perfect, Ultimate Warrior, Hulk Hogan, Bad News Brown, Dino Bravo, Macho Man, Roddy Piper, Ric Flair, Giant Gonzales, Doink, Crush, Hart Foundation, LOD, Demolition, The Model Rick Martel, British Bulldog, Jake the Snake, Ted Dibiase...etc.

What were their gimmicks?


Big Show, Great Khali, CM Punk, Jeff Hardy, John Cena, Batista,Kane, Kofi Kingston, Randy Orton, Chris Jericho, Undertaker, John Morrison, The Miz, Rey Mysterio, Legacy, The Colons, Cryme Tyme, Jack Swagger, Christian, Edge, Zack Ryder, Finlay, Vladimir Kozlov, JBL...

Anybody else see the similarities? And I didn't really list the wrestlers in the second set to mirror the first. I did at first, but then just gave up but you know where I'm coming from.
 
Hell the Boogeyman was given WAY too many chances and still never really broke through to anything more than a repellant reaction after he would stuff worms into his mouth.

What show were you watching? The Boogeyman always got some of the biggest pops on the show...

And I can't even count how many casual fans have said "Where's The Boogeyman?" lately.

That's WWE's problem. They're not appealing to the casual fans. Pro Wrestling needs to be something non-hardcore fans can watch and enjoy. If you're drinking with non-fans and you turn on WWE, there needs to be something to grab their attention and want to keep watching. Of course there needs to be some actual decent wrestling but in between matches you need other things going on. You need The Boogeyman eating a tumor off a Diva's face. You need Snitsky punting a baby into the crowd. You need Heidenrich raping Michael Cole. The WWE has gotten rid of all the attention grabers and that's the main reason why the ratings are lower than ever.
 
The problem with the New Generation isn't gimmicks, it's the lack of any real talent coming through.

The example I can give is Swagger. Great look but sooooo green and really exposed sometimes in ECW to the point where he has to learn so quickly on the move which is never ideal, especially for a talent that is pushed as the next big thing.

I read a feature in a British wrestling mag that highlighted the failing of the WWE developmental systems. For Orton and Cena to be the only real home grown successes (who are still with the company) is pretty shocking to be fair.

Until WWE can realise that they need to hire talent who know the basics of the wrestling business instead of those with a cookie cut body builder look who can't work or speak worth a damn.
 
"Gold Standard" is a nickname, not a gimmick. And when did Paul Burchill have an incest gimmick??? I've never seen any inkling of that.

The WWE desperately needs characters but I've come to realize it's not going to happen. Whenever they actually do debut someone with a gimmick, they get a short push then either release them or job them out. The Boogeyman was one of the most "over" guys in the company but he had a gimmick and the current WWE writers can't handle it so they released him. Kizarny had months of promos but after 2 matches got released.

The fact of the matter is, the WWE writers suck and putting actual characters into storylines is too difficult for them. They can create a character and make vignettes for him before he debuts but after that, they have no clue what to do.

The Boogey Woogey Man was one of the most over guys?
What... WHAT!
Dude, saying that alone disqualifies you from ever giving you opinion again on anything - because it's shit.

As far as gimmick characters, we aren't in the 90's anymore. Society has changed, and so must the WWE Universe - man i hate that slogan. In fact i almost hate it as much as everyone hated the Boogey Woogey Man - garbage.

If you put a gimmick character out there, like Goldust, or Kizarny, or Boogeyman, their shelf life is limited to a year at best. Unless they eventually are repackaged into a believable character, they are gone and we don't see them again.

Perfect example - Steve Austin. If you recall, he was brought in as the "Ring Master" and was managed by Ted Dibiase Senior. That GIMMICK wasn't getting over and Steve Austin repackaged himself as Stone Cold, a character based on his own personality, just turned up on high.
And that is where WWE is really lacking. Wrestlers... I mean WWE Superstars... aren't given the opportunity to show their own personality and, therefore, the audience is never given the opportunity to identify with them.
Like Black Snow said in this post section, give guys - meaning everyone not just maineventers - a chance to talk on the mic.

Right now, they're doing that with the Miz and it's working, he is getting major heel heat and, thus, he is getting over. He's not getting over with some outlandish gimmick, he is just being himself, a real jackass.

Shawn Michaels did it, Stone Cold did it, the Rock did it, lets allow the new batch of stars to emerge. Let's let me talk and give us a reason to watch, not the WWE writers. Cause i'll agree with you there, the writers suck
 
The Boogey Woogey Man was one of the most over guys?
What... WHAT!
Dude, saying that alone disqualifies you from ever giving you opinion again on anything - because it's shit.

The Boogeyman WAS one of the most over guys, you obviously don't pay attention to crowd reaction or you're talking about INTERNET wrestling fans and not the majority.
 
What show were you watching? The Boogeyman always got some of the biggest pops on the show...

And I can't even count how many casual fans have said "Where's The Boogeyman?" lately.

That's WWE's problem. They're not appealing to the casual fans. Pro Wrestling needs to be something non-hardcore fans can watch and enjoy. If you're drinking with non-fans and you turn on WWE, there needs to be something to grab their attention and want to keep watching. Of course there needs to be some actual decent wrestling but in between matches you need other things going on. You need The Boogeyman eating a tumor off a Diva's face. You need Snitsky punting a baby into the crowd. You need Heidenrich raping Michael Cole. The WWE has gotten rid of all the attention grabers and that's the main reason why the ratings are lower than ever.



I don't agree with you, but i guess i get where you're coming from.
The Boogeyman got nothing other than Shlock and awe reaction from the crowd, sure he played his gimmick well, but after the bell rang, he was dog shit in the ring.If you go back and watch some of his matches, listen to the long, deadly silence that ensued between his entrance and the moment he would pull worms out of his pockets, I.E. his match. The man never had one respectable or even remotely compelling prefomance in that ring. This is why he got fired (twice!) , just because a guy can gross people out and give them morbid amusement does not mean the character necessarily works, if that wastrue then Bastion Booger would be a WWE hall of fame inductee. I have to ask, why are you trying to appeal to the casual wrestling fan mentality and backhandedly condemn the IWC on AN INTERNET WRESTLING WEBSITE?


You're asking for arguement friend, one that you can not possibly win here.
If you want to discuss what kind of wrestling you would like to be able to get drunk and watch, then go pander to you're drunken, casual wrestling buddies who treat the show like it's disposable and never really see wrestling for what it is beyond big guys hitting eachother with chairs and hot, half naked women touching eachother. Again, I get where you're coming from even though I dont agree, but I think this is the wrong place to try and make that point. Low brow audiences for low brow platforms friend.
 
I don't agree with you, but i guess i get where you're coming from.
The Boogeyman got nothing other than Shlock and awe reaction from the crowd, sure he played his gimmick well, but after the bell rang, he was dog shit in the ring.If you go back and watch some of his matches, listen to the long, deadly silence that ensued between his entrance and the moment he would pull worms out of his pockets, I.E. his match. The man never had one respectable or even remotely compelling prefomance in that ring. This is why he got fired (twice!) , just because a guy can gross people out and give them morbid amusement does not mean the character necessarily works, if that wastrue then Bastion Booger would be a WWE hall of fame inductee. I have to ask, why are you trying to appeal to the casual wrestling fan mentality and backhandedly condemn the IWC on AN INTERNET WRESTLING WEBSITE?


You're asking for arguement friend, one that you can not possibly win here.
If you want to discuss what kind of wrestling you would like to be able to get drunk and watch, then go pander to you're drunken, casual wrestling buddies who treat the show like it's disposable and never really see wrestling for what it is beyond big guys hitting eachother with chairs and hot, half naked women touching eachother. Again, I get where you're coming from even though I dont agree, but I think this is the wrong place to try and make that point. Low brow audiences for low brow platforms friend.

You can't blame The Boogeyman for the crowd not being into his matches because he never got to work anything other than a squash match. No matter how over your character is, nobody wants to watch you beat on a jobber for 2 and a half minutes and that's about all they ever let Boogeyman do. Either that or get squashed himself by Big Daddy V or Mark Henry or somebody. He did have a few higher profile tag matches once in a while though and always got a big pop when he got tagged in. People wanted to get behind him but for whatever reason, WWE wouldn't let it happen. It's not the first time it's happened and it won't be the last. And I'm not saying Boogeyman was the best performer in the ring, but neither is John Cena. 98% of the Divas couldn't apply an arm lock to save their lives. This is WWE, in-ring ability means nothing.

And I'm not "backhandedly condemning" anyone. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions but the fact is, if the WWE started catering to the Internet fanbase, they'd be off the air within a year.
 
Yes some of those do not have gimmicks, but I know a few of those do. Shelton - gold standard. Burchill - incest gimmick.Randy Orton - i cant name what the gimmick is but he definitely has one.

Yes the gimmicks are garbage but they are out there.

I disagree that Shelton has a gimmick.

You say he is "The Gold Standard". I simply feel that is a nickname ... not a gimmick.

As far as Paul Burchill, he did the incest character once, and it was dropped. He had a gimmick when he was a pirate, as well. Today, he has no gimmick.

Randy Orton had a gimmick for a couple occasions as a psycho ... then that was dropped. He is another one with no gimmick.

Pretty much everyone on the roster has no gimmick anymore. And that is a big part of the reason why the characters are stale.
 
Okay i understand where you're coming from in saying wrestler's need to learn to embrace they're gimmicks. But I think going back to the days of gimmicks like The garbage man (drosee), the hockey player (the goon), the pig farmer (henry and finneus godwin), The Voodoo priest (papa shango), The escaped convict (nails), The Dentist (Issac yankem DDS), The teacher (Dean Douglas) and the The Plumber (his name escapes m at the moment) are something I barely tolerated at the age of 12. It's not an era I care to re-visit.

Okay, so you want to complain about the lousy gimmicks. So what do you do? You lump ALL gimmicks into the same category, while ignoring some of the more successful ones. And I think that is wrong.

All of these wrestlers had gimmicks. And you are going to tell me with a straight face that today's personalities entertain you more than some of these guys:


Hulk Hogan- the All American Hero

The Rock- wisecracking, witty, People's Champion

Steve Austin- the Rogue employee

John Cena- was at one point a White Rapper who had crowds on their feet participating in raps against his opponents.

The Undertaker- the Dead Man.

The Million Dollar Man Ted Dibiase- wealthy, arrogant, snob who was out to prove that everyone had a price

The Honky Tonk Man- Elvis Impersonator, who always assumed that people came to the shows to see the Honky Tonk man sing and dance.

Ravishing Rick Rude- the arrogant stripper who planted a Rude Awakening on a "random lady" after each match. Considered himself God's gift to women.

Mr. Perfect- the Man who considered himself to truly be absolutely perfect

The Big Boss Man- the former Prison Guard who brutally beat his opponents with his nightstick



After the attitude era (or rather after ECW inspired the attitude era), wrestling's perception changed and while it is no longer the attitude era, there is an element that remains from it. And that is the fans intolerance of unrealistic characters (excluding the Undertaker of course lol). Vince has tried to bring some vestige of those gimmicks back at one point or another, in the forms of guys like the boogeyman and Kizarny and Planet stasiak (obscure I know). and while these guys didn't light the world on fire with they're talents, it didn't really matter anyhow because the fans simply didn't buy into them. Hell the Boogeyman was given WAY too many chances and still never really broke through to anything more than a repellant reaction after he would stuff worms into his mouth.

That is because as I pointed out, there are good gimmicks ... and there are bad gimmicks. You can't just lump all gimmicks into the same category. As pointed out, the Boogeyman was one of the least talented superstars in the ring, who was one of the more over talents on the roster, because of his gimmick.

They should have kept him heel, though. I could have seen him and The Undertaker having an excellent program together on TV, if they would have done so.


I think our bigger problem here is the lack of effort a lot of these guys (and creative as well) put into they're characters. It's not that a lot of guys have no gimmick, it's that the gimmicks today are more subversive and subdued. Creative has the right idea, but they need to learn how to follow through and not to quit developing the characters after they have been presented to us
.

I put 99% of the blame on Creative, and not the characters themselves, given how scripted everyone has now seen that WWE really is ... after that script was released to the Internet right before Mania.




Here's where I think these aforementioned creative issues come into play. most of these guys have gimmicks, they just don't have enough effort put forth for people to remember that they do. Even Cena's gimmick is ignored these days.


Cena= White Rapper

Who doesn't rap whatsoever, anymore.


Triple H= Master of mental warfare.

I don't know really what Triple H's gimmick is supposed to be. I only know him by his nicknames over the years ... from him telling us over and over and over again that he is "The Game" or Ross referring to him as the "Cerebral Assassin".


Randy orton= was the legend killer, now he's just carazay! lol

Well, he isn't even crazy anymore. They took that away when they had him admit that he really didn't have IED the week before Mania ... thus killing the most intriguing character they had in years.

One could consider a Legend Killer a gimmick, but now he has no gimmick at all.


Batista= He's suppose to be a wrestling plauge (j/k I got nada here)

Have no idea what Batista is supposed to be. He has a nickname. He doesn't have a gimmick.

Cody Rhodes= He's supposed to have his daddy's charisma , watching him talk, thats gotta be fabricated by creative lol.
Ted Dibiase= :lol:
Christian= Is the rock's understudy, the Creepy little bastard.
Chavo= well, he's ummm....mexican. the wwe tends to make that a gimmick.
Haas= already mentioned him, but now i guess he's shelton's white guy friend.
Benjamin= The gold standard in technical wrestling (and I still buy it dammit)
Knox= His beard is his gimmick lol. That and he's a "schoolyard bully" type
Jamie noble= Is invisible.
Burchill= was a pirate, now he just has a sister.


I don't consider any of those guys to have gimmicks.

i never thought i'd hear someone complain about there being too much wrestling on the average WWE show. I feel the complete opposite way about that, tell the stories in the ring, quit putting the mics in the hands of people who can't tell they're story with it and let them do what they do best. You'd be surprised how much a characters can be developed in the ring as opposed to simply making them talk.

Well, you can disagree with me all you want to, but I stand by the amount of wrestling that is on TV today is killing long-term interest in the business.

Nobody even looks forward to the PPV's anymore, because there is so damn much wrestling during the week, that nobody even looks forward to the PPV matches.

The weekly shows should hype the PPV's by being primarily focused on storylines ... so that people will actually care about the PPV's, where the real money is made.

Now, it's just one PPV after another, with matches people have already seen over a dozen times in 15 minute encounters or more, on the weekly shows, already. Now, I wonder why the interest is so small in PPV's, since Vince gives PPV matches away for free each and every week?

The amount of wrestling given away for free each and every week is doing serious damage to the long term interest in the product.
 
You can't blame The Boogeyman for the crowd not being into his matches because he never got to work anything other than a squash match. No matter how over your character is, nobody wants to watch you beat on a jobber for 2 and a half minutes and that's about all they ever let Boogeyman do. Either that or get squashed himself by Big Daddy V or Mark Henry or somebody. He did have a few higher profile tag matches once in a while though and always got a big pop when he got tagged in. People wanted to get behind him but for whatever reason, WWE wouldn't let it happen. It's not the first time it's happened and it won't be the last. And I'm not saying Boogeyman was the best performer in the ring, but neither is John Cena. 98% of the Divas couldn't apply an arm lock to save their lives. This is WWE, in-ring ability means nothing.

And I'm not "backhandedly condemning" anyone. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions but the fact is, if the WWE started catering to the Internet fanbase, they'd be off the air within a year.



Yes i certainly can blame the boogeyman, because even in those abbreviated two minute displays, his work was atrocious, thats why you never saw extended work from him. First he'd stink the ring up something terrible, then he'd get hurt, it was either one or both with him.
While I'm no cena fan, his work is at least compotent, even if it is unspectacular. And the Divas, well, we both know if boogey only had tits, he'd probably still have a job with plenty of weekly spots to funk up the squared circle.



Vince may not cater to the internet community per sey. but he certainly acknowledges our presence and it seems as if he makes a habit of trying to outsmart us. By pulling such grand swerves to try and fool us internet wrestling fans, isn't that showing a bit of disregard for the casual fan already? or rather maybe just taking the casual viewer for granted?
 
Yes i certainly can blame the boogeyman, because even in those abbreviated two minute displays, his work was atrocious, thats why you never saw extended work from him.

No, his work was fine. He never got to be in a decent match because he had a gimmick. But we could go back and forth about how good a wrestler he was, but it doesn't matter, that's opinion. You think Cena is a better wrestler, I don't. The FACT is that the guy was over, you can judge that by the reaction he got from the crowd.

And what "grand swerve" has Vince pulled lately? I seriously can't remember anything that I couldn't see coming a mile away happening in quite some time. The last thing that even remotely cought me off guard was Christian debuting on ECW with no hype and that certainly wasn't a "swerve". WWE NEEDS to start doing some swerves because the product is much too predictable right now.
 
Okay, so you want to complain about the lousy gimmicks. So what do you do? You lump ALL gimmicks into the same category, while ignoring some of the more successful ones. And I think that is wrong.

Perhaps i did do a bit of lumping, certainly some gimmicks that were just as silly were a HUGE success. But I don't necessarily believe a lot of those gimmicks would have the same kind of successs today. Maybe i'm wrong, it's just my opinion.


All of these wrestlers had gimmicks. And you are going to tell me with a straight face that today's personalities entertain you more than some of these guys





Hulk Hogan- the All American Hero


Hulk Hogan- From the time i was a child even, I have loathed everything about Hogan, the guy has never once appealed to me in any way. As I grew up my contempt for him only cultivated by learning what a curse upon other wrestlers he really is. I'm not gonna say the guy sucks because he has well established himself and there is no disputing his popularity and public adoration. But personally, yes I can say the guy doesn't and has never entertained me with a straight :icon_neutral:



The Rock- wisecracking, witty, People's Champion


The Rock lost me after he turned face in 99, but there's no denying the guy was legendary on the mic.




Steve Austin- the Rogue employee


Same answer except I was big on austin unti his cartoony "what" phase in 01.
Austin was great, I won't argue that.



John Cena- was at one point a White Rapper who had crowds on their feet participating in raps against his opponents.


Ew...I know you're right but still...ew. I preferred the villainous Cena, especially around the time of his feud with Lesnar. But I listed Cena if i'm not mistaken. I would say the miz is well on his way to being the new Heel Cena if creative keeps doing what they're doing with him.


The Undertaker- the Dead Man.

I also listed the Undertaker as an exception, I've always marked out for the dead man, even when I was robbed of the smoke and mirrors by his biker gimmick when I was at the 2000 survivor series, incidently he and Kurt had an awesome match that night. ther is no character that rivals the dead man.

The Million Dollar Man Ted Dibiase- wealthy, arrogant, snob who was out to prove that everyone had a price


Again, Dibiase was a terrific heel, I would put Mr.perfect just a slight notch above him in the heel department from that time frame though. Still Dibiase was a great character. I would say william regal is able to get his level of heat, when he is given the proper oppurtunity.



The Honky Tonk Man- Elvis Impersonator, who always assumed that people came to the shows to see the Honky Tonk man sing and dance.


Honky was great as well, but i would say Santino rivals his comedic persona.



Ravishing Rick Rude- the arrogant stripper who planted a Rude Awakening on a "random lady" after each match. Considered himself God's gift to women.

Rick rude, sighs, he played this gimmick greatly, I would say if there was a guy who paralelled him today......John Morrison.


Mr. Perfect- the Man who considered himself to truly be absolutely perfect


With the exception of jake Roberts, Henning was my favorite wrestler from this era. While this may be a bit of a stretchy comparison, I'd say Robert Roode shows me flashes of Curt at times.

The Big Boss Man- the former Prison Guard who brutally beat his opponents with his nightstick


the big boss/bubba/guardian angel man was a moderate character at best. His nightstick twirling was about all there was to that man, character wise. his promos were fairly unmemorable , but his ring work was always good.




That is because as I pointed out, there are good gimmicks ... and there are bad gimmicks. You can't just lump all gimmicks into the same category. As pointed out, the Boogeyman was one of the least talented superstars in the ring, who was one of the more over talents on the roster, because of his gimmick.


alright, that's a fair point made, I shouldn't have lumped, but I was just presenting the dark side of what you were proposing. I can't help it i'm a natural pessimist, sorry.


They should have kept him heel, though. I could have seen him and The Undertaker having an excellent program together on TV, if they would have done so.


I agree, Boogey owned his gimmick pretty well, i'll never dispute that, but he was just so unexcusably bad in that ring. It erased all merrit his character preformance had everytime that bell rang for me. If he had ever gotten his ring work together to even a capable level, he could have been huge.
.

I put 99% of the blame on Creative, and not the characters themselves, given how scripted everyone has now seen that WWE really is ... after that script was released to the Internet right before Mania.


You're right, I spoke too kindly of creative and too critically of the preformers in this aspect. creative, in both the WWE and in TNA, is largely the problem for what we are currently discussing.




Who doesn't rap whatsoever, anymore.


yes but he still carries that gimmick with him. Regardless of whether he raps or not, that's why the miz rapped on him last week.




I don't know really what Triple H's gimmick is supposed to be. I only know him by his nicknames over the years ... from him telling us over and over and over again that he is "The Game" or Ross referring to him as the "Cerebral Assassin".


again, he was the "master of mental warfare", with actions like marrying into the mcmahon family at a drive through wedding chapel in vegas while steph was passed out and holding JR's well being hostage until mic foley granted him a title shot, the move that got him his first title run I might add. the gimmick has been unused lately, but it's still there, it's just a tougher gimmick to play up when he's playing the face.




Well, he isn't even crazy anymore. They took that away when they had him admit that he really didn't have IED the week before Mania ... thus killing the most intriguing character they had in years.


true, but he still plays into that sociopathic gimmick, even if they did kill it for him.





Have no idea what Batista is supposed to be. He has a nickname. He doesn't have a gimmick.


I know, but i just cant resist any oppurtunity to rip on Fruitista.


Well, you can disagree with me all you want to, but I stand by the amount of wrestling that is on TV today is killing long-term interest in the business.

For me, it's the other way around. But i do realize i'm probably in the minority there.

Nobody even looks forward to the PPV's anymore, because there is so damn much wrestling during the week, that nobody even looks forward to the PPV matches.

I agree, but I think again, this falls more on the ineptitude of creative. If they had compelling storylines, people would maintain interest.
There was almost just as much wrestling in the attitude era every week (replace ECW with WWF shotgun saturday night and WWE superstars with sunday night heat) but the ratings never suffered, IMO it's all about the sad state of wwe creative/booking.
 
No, his work was fine. He never got to be in a decent match because he had a gimmick. But we could go back and forth about how good a wrestler he was, but it doesn't matter, that's opinion. You think Cena is a better wrestler, I don't. The FACT is that the guy was over, you can judge that by the reaction he got from the crowd.

And what "grand swerve" has Vince pulled lately? I seriously can't remember anything that I couldn't see coming a mile away happening in quite some time. The last thing that even remotely cought me off guard was Christian debuting on ECW with no hype and that certainly wasn't a "swerve". WWE NEEDS to start doing some swerves because the product is much too predictable right now.



His work was fine? Okay, we clearly gauge good wrestling on VERY different scales. While opinion plays into who's ring style is more appealing, whether a guy can work a compotent match with someone or not is moreso a matter of obvious visual fact. The boggeyman was sloppy and dangerous in the ring, that's why his matches were short and also why he got injured as often as he did. This has nothing to do with the moves they preform, it's a matter of whether or not a guy can do his job propely in that ring or not. If cena worked the way boogey did, rest assured they'd both be in the same unemployed situation. Then again, Batista still has a job, so perhaps not.


As for the swerves, look no further than what happened at Judgement Day.
Speculation ran wild about Triple H making his return to screw over batista, because creative has become that predictable and the smart fans pretty much knew it was coming. So Vince tried throwing us a curve and got Flair out there instead. If you want more concrete proof, then look at the Royal Rumble, where christian had been set to be the one costing Jeff hardy the world title against Edge. Vince's love of "shock and awe" caused him to shift gears and make Matt Hardy the one who was behind Jeff's downfall.


All because he wanted to swerve the internet Wrestling fans, who cannot help but endlessly speculate and find out leaked info. Surely you can't think creative is that clever, can you? Hell they just booked a Vickie/Santina HOGPEN match for fucking PPV! I really hoped i'd never see another one of those matches in my lifetime again, and I'm sure triple H feels the same way. Anyhow dude, Yes vince panders to us by trying to throw us off at many different turns. Cruise this site for awhile and keep up on things and you'll see that i'm right about that, as long as you're not too casually drunk to pay attention.
 
His work was fine? Okay, we clearly gauge good wrestling on VERY different scales. While opinion plays into who's ring style is more appealing, whether a guy can work a compotent match with someone or not is moreso a matter of obvious visual fact. The boggeyman was sloppy and dangerous in the ring, that's why his matches were short and also why he got injured as often as he did. This has nothing to do with the moves they preform, it's a matter of whether or not a guy can do his job propely in that ring or not. If cena worked the way boogey did, rest assured they'd both be in the same unemployed situation. Then again, Batista still has a job, so perhaps not.

Again, this is all opinion and I'm not going to get into an argument about it. But I will say, if being injured a lot makes you "sloppy and dangerous in the ring", then Rey Mysterio should retire before he kills someone.


As for the swerves, look no further than what happened at Judgement Day.
Speculation ran wild about Triple H making his return to screw over batista, because creative has become that predictable and the smart fans pretty much knew it was coming. So Vince tried throwing us a curve and got Flair out there instead. If you want more concrete proof, then look at the Royal Rumble, where christian had been set to be the one costing Jeff hardy the world title against Edge. Vince's love of "shock and awe" caused him to shift gears and make Matt Hardy the one who was behind Jeff's downfall.

All because he wanted to swerve the internet Wrestling fans, who cannot help but endlessly speculate and find out leaked info. Surely you can't think creative is that clever, can you? Hell they just booked a Vickie/Santina HOGPEN match for fucking PPV! I really hoped i'd never see another one of those matches in my lifetime again, and I'm sure triple H feels the same way. Anyhow dude, Yes vince panders to us by trying to throw us off at many different turns. Cruise this site for awhile and keep up on things and you'll see that i'm right about that, as long as you're not too casually drunk to pay attention

LOL Oh ok, I get it now. A "swerve" is one something reported on the Internet doesn't happen. Dude, 98% of the stuff on the Internet is just educated guessing. Most of the time the "reports" come true because the WWE is so predictable but when they don't, it's not because Vince is trying to "put one over on you". LOL I'm sure Vince is at home right now scouring wrestling websites and shaking his fist in the air.
 
[QUOTEHansChristianFrankenstein;1088558]Again, this is all opinion and I'm not going to get into an argument about it. But I will say, if being injured a lot makes you "sloppy and dangerous in the ring", then Rey Mysterio should retire before he kills someone.[/QUOTE]


Okay, you are clearly not going to get what i'm saying here. Especially if you think Mysterio's work can be compared in any way to the Boogeyman's.
This isn't a matter of opinion, it's a matter of obvious in ring fact.


LOL Oh ok, I get it now. A "swerve" is one something reported on the Internet doesn't happen. Dude, 98% of the stuff on the Internet is just educated guessing. Most of the time the "reports" come true because the WWE is so predictable but when they don't, it's not because Vince is trying to "put one over on you". LOL I'm sure Vince is at home right now scouring wrestling websites and shaking his fist in the air.


Again, you really didn't get what I was saying there. Of course Vince is not at home scouring these sites, but rest assured creative either does themselves or they pay readers to do so. A lot of stuff is educated guessing, however i'm referring more to the stuff that gets leaked, like Christian returning at the royal rumble, that was leaked and people knew what was coming, so vince tried to swerve us. also, you're a damn fool if you don't think Vince is that petty, watch last night's raw again if you need an example.
 
Hes talking about big gimmicks that only last like a couple months like a mummy or something, but a lot of people have gimmicks like triple h ,no big gimmick really, hes just a person, but hes still the king of kings, the cerebreal assassian or however you spell it and hes the game. By gimmick I think he means people like Undertaker, Doink, or Paul Burchill (when he was a pirate).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,838
Messages
3,300,748
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top