I think that is when you hope they just half-ass it with their points, and you can argue their points to hell. As long as you are proving him wrong, you don't have to actually have a point of your own.
WrestleZone Debaters League
- Thread starter Mr. TM
- Start date
I think that is when you hope they just half-ass it with their points, and you can argue their points to hell. As long as you are proving him wrong, you don't have to actually have a point of your own.
Bernkastel
Reaper of Miracles
your welcome, just think it could have been worse... you could have all gotten joshi questions
Just check the schedule, bloody hell I've got quite a number of debates ahead. Quite excited about this week and all the other debates I'll have going on. Nervous given I got a number of the top guys between week 4 and 8, especially D-Man, Ricky & GD
Good luck everybody!
You too fromthesouth.
Good luck everybody!
You too fromthesouth.
IrishCanadian25
Going on 10 years with WrestleZone
After Milk.
SavageTaker
Everybody Has A Price!
I have a question for TM or the judges, whoever can answer it. My opponent made his post and I made mines, what do I do now? Do I just let him respond or do I respond to his post?
I think that you can post however many times you want, ST. So, you can multi-quote his post to death now.
Mantaur Rodeo Clown
X-Pac Rules
It's most likely too late to join. But I was wondering. What if they agree on a point? I mean if you give someone a stance they dont believe in, thats just not cricket.
It's like what teachers always taught me in AP English. Don't go with the idea you like, go with the idea that has the most information and points you can support.
..If you're given a point you don't like, then find the parts you can support of that point and move along. It's like the one I'm doing with Milky right now. I could argue either point, but it's relatively easier to argue the negative. Milky gave me that part, and he took the positive. If he had given me the positive, I would have simply gone out and found parts with violence against women in the WWE and try to twist them into supporting the idea that women should be able to fight men in the WWE.
It's all about finding that evidence. Never mind if you like the evidence or not.
..If you're given a point you don't like, then find the parts you can support of that point and move along. It's like the one I'm doing with Milky right now. I could argue either point, but it's relatively easier to argue the negative. Milky gave me that part, and he took the positive. If he had given me the positive, I would have simply gone out and found parts with violence against women in the WWE and try to twist them into supporting the idea that women should be able to fight men in the WWE.
It's all about finding that evidence. Never mind if you like the evidence or not.
It was one hell of a post man, I am excited to see it progress.
Well the judges and I put together some great ideas. They each deserve some praise. This was a specialty round, as others will be.
There you go mate.
Post away until the time is over!
Sorry Lee, There was an outpour of names, and you were in the next group of 20 names for a second round. I think there are already 13 names sighned up for another round of this if this one is successful.
Yep, someone read into this.
Opening arguments ftw.
Well you can be signed up for the next round. The might agree on a point, but they should argue others. Both sides of the debates are arguable
But keep the passion folks.
Mantaur Rodeo Clown
X-Pac Rules
So, I have to leave my house at 4pm today, to do a bunch of work with my grandfather. Which is in 4 hours, there may be no way I can get back by 8pm to have my final post up for 9pm, is there anyway we can cut this debate off at 4pm, my time (which is East coast) in 4 hours. If RazorBack objects, I will obviously drop this, but there may be no way I can really participate past 4pm, which would make a somewhat unfair debate.