Jack-Hammer
YOU WILL RESPECT MY AUTHORITAH!!!!
A match between the two at WM 26 could potentially be as good, possibly even better, than their match at WM 25. I think the best way to go about it would be to give the feud more of a personal twist and attack. Now, the Undertaker hasn't responded to HBK's challenge and I think that the WWE should continue to play it that way for a while. To be honest, I think it's best not to even have anybody in the WWE bring it up again for a while.
Last time, it was primarily about business. HBK wanted to cement his legacy with yet another milestone accomplishment while Taker wanted to do the same. Have the WWE downplay it, don't mention HBK calling Taker out, don't have Taker respond and, come the Royal Rumble, have HBK interfere in the WHC match and cost Taker the title. That way, Taker drops the belt but doesn't lose any steam heading towards WM and looks strong coming off the ppv. HBK costing Taker the world title could be construed as personal and keep escelating the game of oneupsmanship.
After the Rumble, Taker invades Raw and is seething, furious that HBK would interfere and cost him the title, HBK comes out and just have the two brawl all over the arena Kofi/Orton style. I'd like to see both of them cut some serious promos on each other, show up on one another's show often and get in their face and possibly continue to interfere in each other's matches. However, I wouldn't have either of them go up against one another at any ppv or show in an official match. Just let everything simmer until 'Mania but keep things fresh in people's minds.
At WM itself, I thinkt he match needs to have an epic feel to it like the last one did. Make it a street fight with no DQ or countout. Just let them go all out. However, as to who should win, I'd probably have to go with Taker. If I'm not mistaken, HBK recently said in an interview that he's taking time away from the WWE again after WrestleMania just as he did last year in order to spend time with his family.
Last time, it was primarily about business. HBK wanted to cement his legacy with yet another milestone accomplishment while Taker wanted to do the same. Have the WWE downplay it, don't mention HBK calling Taker out, don't have Taker respond and, come the Royal Rumble, have HBK interfere in the WHC match and cost Taker the title. That way, Taker drops the belt but doesn't lose any steam heading towards WM and looks strong coming off the ppv. HBK costing Taker the world title could be construed as personal and keep escelating the game of oneupsmanship.
After the Rumble, Taker invades Raw and is seething, furious that HBK would interfere and cost him the title, HBK comes out and just have the two brawl all over the arena Kofi/Orton style. I'd like to see both of them cut some serious promos on each other, show up on one another's show often and get in their face and possibly continue to interfere in each other's matches. However, I wouldn't have either of them go up against one another at any ppv or show in an official match. Just let everything simmer until 'Mania but keep things fresh in people's minds.
At WM itself, I thinkt he match needs to have an epic feel to it like the last one did. Make it a street fight with no DQ or countout. Just let them go all out. However, as to who should win, I'd probably have to go with Taker. If I'm not mistaken, HBK recently said in an interview that he's taking time away from the WWE again after WrestleMania just as he did last year in order to spend time with his family.