Would You Like To See Undertaker on Raw?

[MCMG]

The Undertaker is one of the WWE's biggest draws. He has been for a while now but he is still on the 'b' show. When the Undertaker returns he is likely to feud with Kane on smackdown. This is strange for 2 reasons.

1. Raw is the no.1 show and the Undertaker would be best used their.
2. Smackdown is having an emphasis put on youth.

On raw Taker could feud with the Nexus, Cena, Sheamus, Chris Jericho, HHH and a much older Randy Orton.

So when the Undertaker returns could he or should he go and end his career on raw?

 

[Eck]

He should stay on SmackDown. He has been on that show for years. It makes his apperences on Raw more speical then if he was on Raw and appeared on SmackDown. He puts people over on SmackDown. On Raw they already hav people to do that. As for it being the b-show he works hard every Friday to make it comparible to Raw.

 

[YEDemon]

At this point, Undertaker is as associated with Smackdown as Mysterio is or Cole used to be. While a move to Raw would be cool, Smackdown will always be the B show in the eyes of the 'E, and Taker helps give some major star power to the blue brand.

Yes, he could feud with some different stars over on Raw, but I think at this point, the Undertaker should stay on Smackdown. I believe that he's been there since the brand split, though I could be wrong. His appearances on Raw are special, but Smackdown is his home now. I think the Undertaker moving to Raw would be the only switch in the WWE that I would be vehemently against.

 

[Dum Dum Dudley]

For Taker to go to Raw, you would need a face of equal stature to take his spot. HHH would be a good shout but ideally, Cena would be the only one who could truly take Taker's spot as the top, top face on SD!
Could I see it happen? NO. With his relaxed schedule, there is no real reason to has him on RAW. You can't promote him for every PPV because he won't be on them all. Generally, RAW has been the adult show with serious feuds and gimmicks. SD! is where characters like The Boogeyman and Kizarney can be showcased. SD! caters towards a younger audience that can suspend disbelief a lot quicker. I believe that is why Nexus are not featured on SD!
So overall, there is no real reason to put Taker on RAW and weaken an already less than stellar SD!

 

[CJ The Pirate]

Due to the wording of the question in the poll, I had to choose 'I Don't Care.' I don't know if he 'should' or not, if the question was the same as the title of the thread (will he?) then I'd have to say yes. I'd imagine a run on Raw at the end of his career perhaps from the Royal Rumble to Wrestlemania (where everyone is pretty much in agreement as to where he will retire). That is all we'll ever get of him on Raw and rightfully so. Raw is the A Show and gets more viewers than Smackdown and his retirement storyline should be showcased on the biggest stage possible and week by week, that is Monday Night Raw.

 

[kissfan85]

The Undertaker is one of the WWE's biggest draws. He has been for a while now but he is still on the 'b' show. When the Undertaker returns he is likely to feud with Kane on smackdown. This is strange for 2 reasons.

1. Raw is the no.1 show and the Undertaker would be best used their.
2. Smackdown is having an emphasis put on youth.

On raw Taker could feud with the Nexus, Cena, Sheamus, Chris Jericho, HHH and a much older Randy Orton.

So when the Undertaker returns could he or should he go and end his career on raw?

Why do you have to look at it like that?
So your a loser cause your NOT on Raw? Well there aren't a lot of huge names on Smackdown so that being said there's a lot of trust there that the undertaker along with a couple other bigger names are good enough to carry the show.

Now regardless of you thinking Smackdown is the 'B' show....up untill the draft....To me Raw was Dead and Smackdown was a lot better
For me Smackdown always seemed refreshing and I remember the first Smackdown I was in.....8th Grade I think?
Well back to the point...You are not underrated just cause of a spacific show you are on. That is closed minded thinking....Some people do have to be on there or there wouldn't be a show at all....And I know a lot of people who would turn on Smackdown just cause they read that the undertaker will be back...He's a big enough draw and you can trust that people will tune in to see if he's there
'provided he's not injured cause then you know he wont be'

 

[klunderbunker]

I don't see why. It's not like he needs a career boost or anything like that. Taker is a big enough star that he can do whatever he wants and get cheered. he's all about the mystique and not about the in ring stuff. On Raw he would get lost int he shuffle a bit as things there are all over the place and not incredibly coherent. Taker coming there isn't needed but I guess it's not out of the question. I wouldn't do it though if I was WWE unless it was for something special.

 

[enterkey]

I doubt that he would ever go to Raw, he seems perfectly content on Smackdown putting over new talent. With the influx of main event talent on Raw it would be pointless for Taker to go there and he would likely get lost in the shuffle. I for one would be extremely unhappy to see Taker start jobbing to the likes of John Cena although a feud with Sheamus would work nicely. At this point Smackdown needs Taker too much since there are only 4 main eventers on the roster besides him, Kane, Mysterio, Show, and to a lesser extent Swagger. The feud he has going with Kane atm could be one of the greatest of the year, especially if it keeps as the momentum it has had since Taker was injured by Mysterio. Also on Smackdown Taker is able to have breaks a whole lot easier than he would if he were on Raw and as he is growing ever older he has needed them more and more. I couldn't really picture a lot of the things that Taker has done on Smackdown over the past 6 years on Raw since a lot of them would look horrible if done live.

 

[legendkiller420]

he will prolly stay on smackdown he wont be around for to much longer so it would only makes sense he retires on the show he has been on for so long

 

[WweBreezybre]

I dnt think Taker should go to Raw. He is already injured going to Raw will just retire him.Not to say I dnt see him retiring this year. Ps I never look at Raw as the A show I just see it as the first born

 

[Find'er Woo'er Ryder]

no i believe he will stay on smackdown. i feel like he is on there for a reason and that reason is to build up hype for smackdown. i mean if everyone big in the wwe is on raw. i dont think they trade cena to smackdown because the top face in the bussiness today has to be on the "A show"...

 

[Cmpunk is wwe]

I dont think taker will go to raw because he is never really on tv and he has been getting injured alot recently and once he comes back and has is match at mania he will most likely retire or stay on smackdown. Because to be on raw you pretty much have to be on tv every week and with his schedule that is pretty much impossible.

 

[slimmshady]

At this point in his career, taker won't move to raw just because of the lighter schedule he has with being on smackdown. The amount of times undertaker takes time off from the ring in a calendar year just doesn't meet the demands required on raw, in front of a live television audience. So my answer is there just isn't any need for him to move, if there was, he would have done it at least a good 4-5 years ago. Furthermore, I believe undertaker is one of those unique gimmicks and well respected enough to feud against any of the raw roster without being drafted to raw.

 

[Ruthless-RKO]

He is one of a few stars on Smackdown..he and Rey are the biggest draws on the show..

He will stay on Smackdown, help put the talent over as well, just like HBK always stayed on Raw...

There are just some people who don't move..I mean do we really think Cena will move back to Smackdown?? its been over 5 years now...

While I would enjoy seeing him on Raw, Smackdown need him and YES...they DO use him, heck he had a long World title reign just last year! and I see him getting another one...

 

[MonMan10]

Undertaker will always stay on SmackDown.
For 1.His is the only reason I watch SmackDown
2.If he goes to Raw, SmackDown ratings will drop like a MotherF**ker
3.New guys who is now making their debut will get lame pushes due to the fact that Smackdown will only have 3 maineventers and rest is only mid-carders.
So yeah HE NEEDS TO STAY

 

[Jeff]

I have been meaning to ask this question for a while now and never got around to asking it. We all know The Undertaker will not be around for much longer as a active wrestler. I mean he barely is one now anyways. We all know that Raw is the A show in the WWE and Smackdown is the B show. My question for you is, would you like to see The Undertaker have one last run on Raw? My follow up is, if yes what would you like to see him do?

I would answer yes. I think Undertaker deserves one good main event Raw feud to end his career. Maybe one last feud with a newly turned heel Cena or Orton. Something to really send him off on a great last note.

What do you all think? Should WWE move Undertaker to Raw for the last part of his career?

 

[Sharpshooter51]

Yes, it would be nice to see Taker end his career with some new feuds on Raw, feuds with Chris Jericho, Sheamus, and John Cena would be a great way to end his career, he could also put over Miz (tho I hate the Miz and hope he gets Future Endeavored but I can see that won't happen)

So yes, Taker to raw is a good idea

 

[supersrc]

as much as the undertaker and seeing how him and hhh are the last great ones left im gonna have to say no.

I liked that HBK was RAW and Undertaker was Smackdown. Each show having thier own legend, I also think it should stay that way as it gives each show their own identity. HBK retired but sadly taker will soon follow I also think its cool that even though there both vinces most loyal and will be seen as wwe's there both seen as Raws HBK and Smackdowns Taker

 

[JR83]

I prefer to see him finish out his career on Smackdown. He's been there almost since the beginning when he jumped ship to go after Brock Lesnar and has been the cornerstone of that show for the better part of a decade. It would be cool to see him on Raw with fresh fueds and whatnot, but that's what the draft is for, bringing over new souls to dark side(blue brand). You never saw HBK traded to Smackdown for personal conflicts, who know's maybe the Undertaker prefers working on Tuesdays.

 

[The Crock]

When I think of Smackdown I think of The Undertaker. He shouldn't jump ship to Raw. He can do just as much on Smackdown, especially since it's moving to SyFy. They need stars on Smackdown. Trust me, he'll win the WHC sooner or later off of Kane. That's the point of their feud. On Raw he'd just be another Main Event guy.

 

[sweet-shin-music]

I think he should stay on smackdown. I mean raw has jericho, triple h, sheamus, cena, orton, edge and a bunch of younger guys like miz, barrett, morrison and danielson that can main event. All smackdown has is taker, kane, cm punk, mysterio, and big show. Its kinda unbalanced imo. They need to move someone over in the draft to make some new feuds for him before he retires. Which i think will be sooner rather than later.

 

[The Best At What I Do]

Not at all. Taker needs to stay on Smackdown! his entire life... Even though he's dead. RAW is overstacked as it is and The Undertaker is the only perpetual main-eventer on the blue brand. I just hope that WWE even things back out after the switch to SyFy. I'm looking at you Edge and Jericho.

 

[Dressler]

No. I think The Undertaker is just fine for Smackdown!, it gives that show some much needed "Star Power". Hes the cornerstone of that show, its like moving Rey Mysterio to Raw, it didn't work, and it wouldn't work for The Undertaker.

I mean think of what The Undertaker does, he goes into Wrestlemania, wins, takes 3-4 Months off, comes back, mini-feud, World Title feud, Wrestlemania Feud, repeat. You can't do that on Raw, its to crowded, with guys like Randy Orton, The Miz, John Cena, Triple H, Sheamus, The Undertaker is not needed nor should he be put on Raw simply because the schedule he has works best on Smackdown!. Maybe 4-5 years ago yes, 'Taker on Raw would've been good. Not anymore.

 

[YEDemon]

Taker has been on Smackdown forever, and to me, at least, he is synonymous with the Blue Brand. Smackdown benefits from his star power, and he makes a good target for the younger guys that they are trying to build up there.

The biggest reason though? Taker's been around for twenty years. If he was on raw, every single step, strike, anything would be VINTAGE~! Let's keep him on the blue brand.