M
majestic-marcus
Guest
You sexist ignorant person. How dare you say something like that? It's completely untrue and borders on stupidity. Women are just as good, even better than men at some sports. I cannot believe you have the cheek to say something as ignorant as that. Completely disrespectful. Why don't you go show me how much better you are than Awesome Kong then? No? I didn't think so.
As much as I do beleive that the top male wrestlers are straight up better than the female wrestlers, I was only jokin with my 'men are better at sports' comment and if I hurt yourt feelings, I hearby apologize.
Having said that, who actually wants to see a man versus a woman, if the woman loses the bloke gets labelled a woman beater and if the man loses he gets labelled a pussy (seriously, if angle lost to Kong, his title would be seen as completely worthless).
If Kong won it would make the rest of the knockouts look even worse. Gail Kim has held her own against Kong but do you really feel she could beat Angle, Joe, Christian, Sting etc. I don't and as such if they have Kong beat Angle (or whoever) clean they show her as a dominating force and consequently the rest of the division as crap (which it is far from being)
Finnally, the Knockout title is the same as the equivilent of the heavyweight title and though it may be placed in the mid-card at PPV's it isn't a mid-card title like the IC, US or X-division. If women need more titles (which i'm all for), give them a tag-title (theirs plenty of women tag teams) or a mid-card singles title, use it as an IC style title which can be used to progress the careers of upcoming talent. So far TNA have treated this division brilliantly and its often the best part of the show but if everyone ends up winning the title it'll devalue it so a midcard title would be good, though I think a tag-title would be better.