Would The Undertaker and Kane been as successful without their gimmicks?

I don't really understand the question. If you're asking if Undertaker and Kane would have been popular without being Undertaker and Kane, then the answer is an emphatic no.

Mark Calloway and Glen Jacobs wouldn't have been as popular without being known as Undertaker and Kane. Undertaker's one of the most famous characters the WWE's ever had. His streak at Wrestlemania's also one of the draws for Wrestlemania and has been for quite a while now.

Prior to Glen Jacobs being Kane, he was Isaac Yankem, DDS. And before that, he was Nailz, an escaped convict set to get revenge on Big Boss Man. Lets just say Jacobs is glad Kane was created.

So to answer your question, there's no possible way the two characters would have been trumped by anything else Mark Calloway or Glen Jacobs would have done.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,834
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top