I'm new to this idea so bear with me. Roman Reigns... get use to that name. I don't know all I'm allowed to say, but this guy has had years worth of storyline written in cement for years.
Learning from Cena, the crowd has no clout whatsoever when it comes to what WWE wants. You may say it did with Daniel Bryan, but for me, I think WWE always knows what they're doing and it didn't take fan support to quickly make Bryan a World HW champion, but they created the extra oomph for his WWE title shot...
WWE has always followed a similar formula, a top guy, a few other stars, but in recent years the other stars unless veterans (Taker, Rock, HHH, Jericho) have meant less and less. WWE made Hogan, Savage, Piper, Andre, Heenan, Perfect, Roberts, Rude, Hart Foundation, Rockers, Steamboat, LOD, etc etc legends.
Is it a case of cause and effect in that "fans don't universally like Cena, but that's the best they're going to get" or is it just by chance that WWE never has storylines for it's tag, US, and IC titles?
Truly, when was the last time Ziggler was in a storyline? WWE has become a UFC card where neither the prelims or PPV matches matter until the main event, which is a sucky card to UFC fans.
Knowing WWE, I think the know exactly what they're doing. My opinion is that if fans were more accomodating to Cena, then the whole card all around would be better. They are in a position that Cena is so important that the crowd only cares about him that they have to give extra time to him and make sure he's not upstaged.
With that said, I believe that if WWE fans blindly accept Roman Reigns, for all his shortcomings, that we will then see a more thought-out and entertaining product from WWE.
I don't agree with this, because I know what Reigns offers, but I'm of the mindset that this is how WWE thinks. Reward their failures and they shall reward you. It's a stubborn and thick-headed company, there is no use fighting them.
Thoughts?
Learning from Cena, the crowd has no clout whatsoever when it comes to what WWE wants. You may say it did with Daniel Bryan, but for me, I think WWE always knows what they're doing and it didn't take fan support to quickly make Bryan a World HW champion, but they created the extra oomph for his WWE title shot...
WWE has always followed a similar formula, a top guy, a few other stars, but in recent years the other stars unless veterans (Taker, Rock, HHH, Jericho) have meant less and less. WWE made Hogan, Savage, Piper, Andre, Heenan, Perfect, Roberts, Rude, Hart Foundation, Rockers, Steamboat, LOD, etc etc legends.
Is it a case of cause and effect in that "fans don't universally like Cena, but that's the best they're going to get" or is it just by chance that WWE never has storylines for it's tag, US, and IC titles?
Truly, when was the last time Ziggler was in a storyline? WWE has become a UFC card where neither the prelims or PPV matches matter until the main event, which is a sucky card to UFC fans.
Knowing WWE, I think the know exactly what they're doing. My opinion is that if fans were more accomodating to Cena, then the whole card all around would be better. They are in a position that Cena is so important that the crowd only cares about him that they have to give extra time to him and make sure he's not upstaged.
With that said, I believe that if WWE fans blindly accept Roman Reigns, for all his shortcomings, that we will then see a more thought-out and entertaining product from WWE.
I don't agree with this, because I know what Reigns offers, but I'm of the mindset that this is how WWE thinks. Reward their failures and they shall reward you. It's a stubborn and thick-headed company, there is no use fighting them.
Thoughts?