Poop Master Flex
Mid-Card Championship Winner
I think you kind of misunderstood me. I understand why Wrestlemania 3 is seen in the light that it is which is why i said "the hoopla" for the Andre/Hogan match made it redeemable. With WM 6 I guess I'm a bit bias for that Wrestlemania alone because I never really liked Hogan and I didn't really become a Warrior fan until recently. But again one match can't make a card. The notion that a show can be good by putting all the focus on the main event is exactly why non-main eventers get buried so often and why no one really cares about anything except the top titles. And not really them anymore considering we've had so many PPVs in the past few years where the champion didn't main event. isn't that pretty much what a lot of you guys have been complaining about for a while now? That WWE doesn't care about anything but the main event yet it's ok if it's for Wrestlemania? That's kind of a double standard
I'm not saying they should only care about the main event (if that happens there is no growth), I'm saying the main event usually sells the show and a shows success is often determined by how the main event went. I know it's not black and white like that but main events often save bad events and cripple good events because its the match everyone cares about. Think of it like this: I remember seeing the 1st Holyfield vs. Lewis title fight live on PPV, there were some good fights on that card but the Holyfield/Lewis fight SUCKED, and it had a screwy finish, ergo the card was looked at as a dud based on that alone, it overshadowed everything else on the card. I'm just saying the success of the main event often determines the light a big event like Wrestlemania is looked at.
I also look at it like this. If the main event attracts the fans and gets the fans to buy the event, then hitting those big notes will be a huge factor in determining if those fans will come back or not. For example you didn't have much good to say about WM14, yet that Wrestlemania is what ultimately swayed the ratings war in WWE's favor, so it can't be bad if it achieved the goal it set out to achieve. It wasn't amazing or anything but a lot of the matches were fun, they hit all the right notes (Taker/Kane, Sable looked good in her match, Tyson turning on DX, Austin winning the title) therefore it was a good Mania and achieved what WWE was aiming for.
I feel that Wrestlemania is not only the culmination of the year, but its also the start of the year as well as what happens in Wrestlemania starts setting up what will happen in the next year. As long as Wrestlemania can hit the big notes and get fans watching then it opens up an opportunity for the Cesaro's of the world to get noticed and to get on the map.