Why Is Kane Challenging For The Title In 2014?

[MMK]

So Kane has once again put the mask back on. No this is not a rerun, but it sure feels like it.

I feel one of the biggest hindrances to the development of new wrestlers in WWE is guys like Kane, Big Show, and Christian still working regular schedules despite being 10 years past their expiration date. Less is more with these three. The more we see Big Show the less of a big deal he is. Every time I see them on TV I think this is air time that could have been given to new talent.

At this stage in their careers, Kane and Big Show should not be working regular schedules, let alone competing for the WWE title. Both would be better used as special attractions at big events. Kane would get a great pop if he only showed up once a year at The Rumble, each year in a different retro costume. He could make other sporadic appearances throughout the year, but his days of working a regular schedule SHOULD be over.

I don't want to see Daniel Bryan's time as champion be wasted having him put on mediocre hardcore matches against wrestlers past their prime. But I think that's exactly what's going to happen. Kane will be first, then the inevitable rematches against Triple H, Batista, and Orton despite the fact that he's already faced and beaten all 4.

Bryan is very comparable to Bret Hart. Both were champions not by design, but because original plans fell apart and they were a safe reliable backup plan. But when Bret Hart won the title for the first time, they didn't have him fight names from the past. Bret defended against his peers in the New Generation, starting with Shawn at Survivor Series 92, Razor at Rumble 93, Yokozuna at Mania 9, and later Owen Hart, 123 Kid, Diesel, etc.

I hope Bryan eventually defends against Wyatt, Ziggler, Cesaro, Ambrose, Rollins, Reigns and others. But I feel his time at the top will be hijacked by stars from the past who should have been let go a long time ago.

 

[Con T.]

92 was also a shitty time for business. I assure you, if Bret Hart was challenged by Macho Man for the belt, he'd gladly accept. And they'd do better business.

Kane, of course, is not Macho Man. But he is a logical stop gap until Daniel Bryan challenges the other members of Triple H's authority. Daniel can get good matches out of anyone. Would you rather sacrifice hot shotting someone that doesn't need the shot yet, and would waste the match a bit (see; Cesaro, Wyatt)?

 

[George Steele's Barber]

Didn't Bret Hart feud with Lawler over the title during that time? Anyway, not important. Bryan and Hart are not alike and this is 2014.

There are a lot of Raws and Special Events. This isn't the feud most want but they have to fill time with some thing. If DB has the talent we think or hope he has he will make it work and folks will buy. I'm not sure who you expect to feud for the title but be careful what you wish for because most of the time someone has to come out the loser.

 

[Aquaman6686]

So Kane has once again put the mask back on. No this is not a rerun, but it sure feels like it.

I feel one of the biggest hindrances to the development of new wrestlers in WWE is guys like Kane, Big Show, and Christian still working regular schedules despite being 10 years past their expiration date. Less is more with these three. The more we see Big Show the less of a big deal he is. Every time I see them on TV I think this is air time that could have been given to new talent.

At this stage in their careers, Kane and Big Show should not be working regular schedules, let alone competing for the WWE title. Both would be better used as special attractions at big events. Kane would get a great pop if he only showed up once a year at The Rumble, each year in a different retro costume. He could make other sporadic appearances throughout the year, but his days of working a regular schedule SHOULD be over.

I don't want to see Daniel Bryan's time as champion be wasted having him put on mediocre hardcore matches against wrestlers past their prime. But I think that's exactly what's going to happen. Kane will be first, then the inevitable rematches against Triple H, Batista, and Orton despite the fact that he's already faced and beaten all 4.

Bryan is very comparable to Bret Hart. Both were champions not by design, but because original plans fell apart and they were a safe reliable backup plan. But when Bret Hart won the title for the first time, they didn't have him fight names from the past. Bret defended against his peers in the New Generation, starting with Shawn at Survivor Series 92, Razor at Rumble 93, Yokozuna at Mania 9, and later Owen Hart, 123 Kid, Diesel, etc.

I hope Bryan eventually defends against Wyatt, Ziggler, Cesaro, Ambrose, Rollins, Reigns and others. But I feel his time at the top will be hijacked by stars from the past who should have been let go a long time ago.

I couldn't disagree more. If a wrestler can still go, there is no reason he can't work a full-time schedule and keep his spot on the card. Kane can still work a match as well as he could 15 years ago. He was never a lightning-fast spot monkey and never will be - he's a slow, deliberate monster, and he still plays it perfectly well. I think WWE has gone TOO far in pushing young guys over established talent - the fact that Alexander Rusev is on the card for Extreme Rules while half a dozen former World Champions aren't on the card is absolutely absurd.

 

[Catacomb]

So Kane has once again put the mask back on. No this is not a rerun, but it sure feels like it.

I feel one of the biggest hindrances to the development of new wrestlers in WWE is guys like Kane, Big Show, and Christian still working regular schedules despite being 10 years past their expiration date. Less is more with these three. The more we see Big Show the less of a big deal he is. Every time I see them on TV I think this is air time that could have been given to new talent.

At this stage in their careers, Kane and Big Show should not be working regular schedules, let alone competing for the WWE title. Both would be better used as special attractions at big events. Kane would get a great pop if he only showed up once a year at The Rumble, each year in a different retro costume. He could make other sporadic appearances throughout the year, but his days of working a regular schedule SHOULD be over.

I don't want to see Daniel Bryan's time as champion be wasted having him put on mediocre hardcore matches against wrestlers past their prime. But I think that's exactly what's going to happen. Kane will be first, then the inevitable rematches against Triple H, Batista, and Orton despite the fact that he's already faced and beaten all 4.

Bryan is very comparable to Bret Hart. Both were champions not by design, but because original plans fell apart and they were a safe reliable backup plan. But when Bret Hart won the title for the first time, they didn't have him fight names from the past. Bret defended against his peers in the New Generation, starting with Shawn at Survivor Series 92, Razor at Rumble 93, Yokozuna at Mania 9, and later Owen Hart, 123 Kid, Diesel, etc.

I hope Bryan eventually defends against Wyatt, Ziggler, Cesaro, Ambrose, Rollins, Reigns and others. But I feel his time at the top will be hijacked by stars from the past who should have been let go a long time ago.

its funny you mention that because the original plans called for bret to face jake the snake, hulk hogan and ultimate warrior, all names from the past. lets not forget bret defended and lost to bob backlund

in response to the original question, kane challenges bryan because that is what makes sense in the story. wwe is actually doing things that relate and make sense and yet they still get flak for it. some "fans" are impossible to please, and i get the feeling they only watch so they have something to complain about

 

[TWJC: The Beginning]

Kane is credible and logical. People believe him as a monster even if no one really thinks he'll win. He's doing what his job has always been. An upper level enhancement talent. He's the monster people slay.

Who else would you have him wrestle? A random Ziggler feud? A random Miz feud? Kane makes storyline sense and Kane carries name value.

You want to talk about Bret Hart's title reigns, he once defended the title against the Patriot in 1997 in front of about 5,000 fans at a PPV. Back in 1992 there were less PPVs, thus, less feuds, thus, less need for interim feuds.

Some of you need to order WWE Network and go back and watch the old stuff. Maybe then you'll realize how good the current product really is.

 

[Jack-Hammer]

As others have mentioned, Kane is a good filler opponent for Bryan until members of Evolution start to focus on regaining the title. WWE had known of Bryan's impending wedding to Brie Bella for some time, probably months in advance. As is only fitting, Bryan would be given a week off for his honeymoon and with all the time to come up with a story, it's decided that Evolution returns to feud with The Shield. It's not as if Kane doesn't have a strong past with Bryan and Kane can still go. Hell, the guy looks like he's in fantastic shape.

As far as Bryan facing guys like Cesaro, Ziggler and others, nothing wrong with wanting to see that. However, Cesaro's not ready. He's only been a "Paul Heyman Guy" for a few weeks and people already want him in the main event? Please... As for, Ambrose, Rollins & Reigns are all great talents, but they've not established themselves as singles players and that can only be changed with the passage of time. Ziggler's nowhere close to the main event right now, so it's not as if he can just suddenly pop up and go after the title without reestablishing his credibility. As far as Bray Wyatt goes, I'd love to see him feud with Bryan over the title. Their match at the Royal Rumble was killer and it's the only one they've had, so there's definitely room for an extension of their program.

Facing off against guys like Kane, Orton, Triple H & Batista is how a fresh face gains credibility in the long term. Between those four are 33 World Championship wins, so being able to successfully defend against names who're that established is how young champions carve their names into history.

 

[Animeboy010]

Please Stop comparing him to Bret Hart'' they're not alike. from the moment he won the title at WM. I believe Daniel Bryan's reign will be more close to Chris Benoit, Who faced Kane, Michaels and Triple H (twice) difference,of course will be Bryan gets a longer title reign than the WWE gave Benoit. due,to,pushing Orton as a main eventer. making him the youngest World Champion in company history..I think Bryan will face Kane, Orton ( probably twice) move on to Lesnar or Cena/Batista..

 

[tvcolosi]

To answer your main question, they had no other fresh heels to line up. Bray and Cena will be great challengers in a month or 2. 1 of the reformed Evilution all lost at mania, a return with Batista or Orton is stale. A HHH rematch is too soon. Cesaro, Barrett, Shemus, RVD, ADR, Rusev just not ready. Any of the guys in Sheld will be ready after the Evaloution feud. Would an 8-man be better? Maybe but I noticed "Battleground" was moved to July, perhaps we get the 8man there.

 

[IT Factor]

The answer is quite simple: there aren't many contenders for titles these days. Especially the WWE World Heavyweight title. Kane makes sense because he is in league with "The Authority" and he was once tag team partners with Bryan. Bryan needs credible contenders to beat to give him legitimacy and nothing would solidify his credibility more than beating established vets like Kane. Some people don't understand the concept of building new stars by giving them monumental wins over established talents....

 

[MoRtAnDaD]

To me its like...we got some unfinished business.... I think thats the concept, and im ok with it.

OT: it was great seeing kane using the tombstone....3 times!. Probably theres no meaning behind it, but it made a impact seeing big red using it.

 

[Trill Co$by]

I would have to assume that it's because Kane's still a believable contender, and to be honest, nobody gets tired of seeing him. Let's face it, he is the original Yes Movement. By that, I mean that he was intentionally brought in for the sole purpose of losing to Taker at WM10, only for him to turn around and become one of the most recognizable figures in WWE. Kane is fine, and the way they're working the mask here is even better. Plus, Kane's still pissed that he's not been able to beat Daniel Bryan without the mask, so putting on the mask and going back to that dark place could only help to further his chances.

Secondly, as it's been mentioned before, Kane's the Authority guy that makes sense. Randy is probably going to save his rematch, Batista is gone after Extreme Rules, and HHH probably will face Bryan at either MITB or SummerSlam. But until then, Kane is the only guy that makes sense unless they really feel like forcing us to watch a Daniel Bryan & Del Rio program. Or maybe even have Swagger challenge for the title. I don't think he's too badly damaged.

 

[JJ15776]

Please Stop comparing him to Bret Hart'' they're not alike. from the moment he won the title at WM. I believe Daniel Bryan's reign will be more close to Chris Benoit, Who faced Kane, Michaels and Triple H (twice) difference,of course will be Bryan gets a longer title reign than the WWE gave Benoit. due,to,pushing Orton as a main eventer. making him the youngest World Champion in company history..I think Bryan will face Kane, Orton ( probably twice) move on to Lesnar or Cena/Batista..

The Benoit comparison is a very good one, and I think there's a good chance their reigns will be the exact same length. Benoit lost the title to Randy Orton at SummerSlam, and I wouldn't be surprised if Bryan lost the title at SummerSlam...somewhat ironically, to the guy whose record Orton broke, Brock Lesnar. Of course, that could also happen at Survivor Series or Royal Rumble...who knows.

But on topic, I have no problem with Kane fighting for the title. Nobody else is ready. It's not going to benefit any of those guys listed to lose to Daniel Bryan, nor is it going to benefit Daniel Bryan to beat them. People would just complain that he didn't beat anybody noteworthy during his run, and nobody wants that. Also, the history between Kane and Bryan makes this match a natural, especially with Kane getting demonic and putting on the mask again.

Would it be nice if Ziggler was over enough to challenge for the title? Of course. But he's not. Kane is. They need young guys to step up into these roles so they can phase out the veterans, they can't just force it to happen.

 

[L@RISANO]

92 was also a shitty time for business. I assure you, if Bret Hart was challenged by Macho Man for the belt, he'd gladly accept. And they'd do better business.

Kane, of course, is not Macho Man. But he is a logical stop gap until Daniel Bryan challenges the other members of Triple H's authority. Daniel can get good matches out of anyone. Would you rather sacrifice hot shotting someone that doesn't need the shot yet, and would waste the match a bit (see; Cesaro, Wyatt)?

Agreed.

After just having matches with Orton, Batista and HHH at Mania and a long feud in the time before the event...having Kane who is still a part of the Authority as a fresh opponent first up is a good thing.

Also, guys like Kane, Big Show, Mark Henry and Christian are established veterans, who can literally walk into the Main Event scene as credible enough challengers. Indeed they might not be Big Draws, but as said by DDO above, it is better than hot shotting up and coming stars into the Main Event before they are ready to do so.

Tbh, after the long chase that Daniel Bryan had, and with the 3 main challengers already having their matches not too long ago...what is the point of feeding a Cena or even Brock first up when it is obvious that Bryan will most probably get a nice decent length reign?

 

[bioshock]

Sounds like you want more part time wrestlers, something most dislike about Rock and Lesnar, being part timers that is. I think its OK Kane gets a PPV title match, just so long as its not 3 straight PPV main events.

 

[Creepy Old Man]

Kane is terrible. He's just a large man who was over from 1997-1999 because he got a rub from being The Undertaker's brother. Removing the mask 11 years ago was the death knell for his boring character.

Was looking at his Wikipedia page there, which includes the Wrestling Observer votes he's won:

Most Disgusting Promotional Tactic (2004) Impregnating Lita
Most Overrated (2010)
Worst Feud of the Year (2002) vs. Triple H
Worst Feud of the Year (2003) vs. Shane McMahon
Worst Feud of the Year (2004) vs. Matt Hardy and Lita
Worst Feud of the Year (2007) vs. Big Daddy V
Worst Feud of the Year (2008) vs. Rey Mysterio
Worst Feud of the Year (2010) vs. Edge
Worst Feud of the Year (2012) vs. John Cena
Worst Gimmick (1996) as Fake Diesel
Worst Worked Match of the Year (2001) with The Undertaker vs. KroniK at Unforgiven

 

[Headman]

Same reason Ravishing Rick Rude got the first ppv crack at Warrior's title. They've got a history together. Plus there's no reason to blow through the money feuds. How many credible main eventers are there for Bryan to face? Cena, Triple H, Randy Orton, Batista, Brock Lesnar and... well I guess that's it. Kane is that next tier down. He makes a credible challenger and their built in history means they don't have to do much creatively.

 

[lowandmighty]

I like kane, and I like him when he wears the mask and plays the character.

Sadly, thats why I don't like him feuding with Daniel Bryan. Kane is obviously not winning the belt so why even bother?

I agree Bryan should be feuding with the new generation, but I think he can still feud with Orton, I mean there must be a rematch. Plus Orton still has at least another 10 years in him and is only 2 years older than Bryan himself.

I agree Kane should be used sporadically for big appearances, mainly for nostalgic purposes, he is that age now.

 

[rge2010]

No issues with Kane. He is a logical stopgap while Evolution fued with The Shield and Bryan and Kane have a backstory with each other.

 

[MoRtAnDaD]

We usually rant about how wwe doesnt have memory. Well this time they have and its cool, there was never a real closure on Kane-Bryan bad blood.

Its a filler feud, but with a couple of years of history on its back.

Better Kane, than "PUT MID TO UP CARD NAME HERE" , at least they dont have to rush a storyline for this particular feud/match.

 

[MCMG]

Cena, Bray, Orton and Batista are occupied. Punk is sitting at home. Brock and The Rock are part-timers. The Miz is off shooting The Marine or whatever. Cesaro has just joined Heyman and both Ziggler and Sheamus are good guys.

There are very few options and Kane is a good choice. They have history. Not just the last few months but way back to when they were tag champs. Kane is a monster and Bryan is an underdog meaning it works perfectly. If they want to persist with Evolution then I'm not sure who is next. I'd personally have The Miz but he might still be occupied making the movie.

There is far more star power on this roster than there was back when Bret was champ. He and Shawn were doomed when Hogan left and had no chance. Bryan has Cena and co. to help carry the show.

 

[laodaron]

Trust me, I don't want to see Kane fighting any more than anyone else does, but he's not that bad of a choice. It's a part of the brilliant booking the WWE has been doing since last year.

I agree, DB fighting Kane, then Orton, Batista, and probably HHH again, and finally culminating with probably Brock doesn't sound that great at first. But then once you realize that after they have him defeat the "Old Guard" it makes more logical sense then for the younger talent to start moving into the title picture. But none of them are ready right now. Wyatt is probably the worst main eventer there is at actual wrestling ability, Cesaro, as showcased in his RVD match, is still a little rusty to go with the older wrestlers, I don't know who else you think would be appropriate for a title match, but chances are, they just aren't ready, either.

 

[kumarjtk]

this is bryan first legit wwe title reign. He first fight with his former tag team partner kane. He move on the authority storyline lately. he defend the title with kane until summerslam. Brock will challenge bryan and win the belt or he destroy bryan then mitb winner cash it.

 

[George Steele's Barber]

One thing I forgot to mention yesterday. If this Kane/Bryan feud somehow brings back the return of Dr. Shelby then we all win and this was the most necessary feud in WWE history.

 

[GOOZEKING]

This fued is ONLY good if they bring in shelby and talk about who was the true "weak link"